{"title":"俄狄浦斯另一面的法律:弗洛伊德和拉康论法律与自我塑造","authors":"Daniel Hourigan","doi":"10.1177/17438721241234195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates the place of law in the Oedipus complex set out by Sigmund Freud and its later revision by Jacques Lacan. Few accounts of self-formation have been as widely recognised and discussed as the Oedipus complex. Yet the tensions that Freud recovered from Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex were a persistent feature of the theories of schools of psychoanalysis that broke away as much as those who followed Freud. In this article, I outline the Freudian position on the complex and its connection to the law before then examining the two phases of Lacan’s return to Freud’s Oedipus complex in Seminar VII and Seminar XVII.","PeriodicalId":514759,"journal":{"name":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","volume":"56 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law on the Other Side of Oedipus: Freud and Lacan on Law and Self-Formation\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Hourigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17438721241234195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates the place of law in the Oedipus complex set out by Sigmund Freud and its later revision by Jacques Lacan. Few accounts of self-formation have been as widely recognised and discussed as the Oedipus complex. Yet the tensions that Freud recovered from Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex were a persistent feature of the theories of schools of psychoanalysis that broke away as much as those who followed Freud. In this article, I outline the Freudian position on the complex and its connection to the law before then examining the two phases of Lacan’s return to Freud’s Oedipus complex in Seminar VII and Seminar XVII.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Culture and the Humanities\",\"volume\":\"56 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Culture and the Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241234195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Culture and the Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17438721241234195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了法律在西格蒙德-弗洛伊德(Sigmund Freud)提出的俄狄浦斯情结中的地位,以及雅克-拉康(Jacques Lacan)后来对俄狄浦斯情结的修正。很少有关于自我塑造的论述能像俄狄浦斯情结那样得到广泛认可和讨论。然而,弗洛伊德从索福克勒斯的《俄狄浦斯王》(Oedipus Rex)中发掘出的紧张关系,却一直是精神分析学派理论的一大特色。在本文中,我首先概述了弗洛伊德关于情结的立场及其与法律的联系,然后考察了拉康在研讨会 VII 和研讨会 XVII 中回归弗洛伊德俄狄浦斯情结的两个阶段。
Law on the Other Side of Oedipus: Freud and Lacan on Law and Self-Formation
This article investigates the place of law in the Oedipus complex set out by Sigmund Freud and its later revision by Jacques Lacan. Few accounts of self-formation have been as widely recognised and discussed as the Oedipus complex. Yet the tensions that Freud recovered from Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex were a persistent feature of the theories of schools of psychoanalysis that broke away as much as those who followed Freud. In this article, I outline the Freudian position on the complex and its connection to the law before then examining the two phases of Lacan’s return to Freud’s Oedipus complex in Seminar VII and Seminar XVII.