埃特尔-安-伯顿-布朗与博尼在论坛,1898-1904 年

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Papers of the British School at Rome Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1017/s0068246224000023
Susan M. Dixon
{"title":"埃特尔-安-伯顿-布朗与博尼在论坛,1898-1904 年","authors":"Susan M. Dixon","doi":"10.1017/s0068246224000023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay has two objectives. First, it acknowledges and situates the contribution of Ethel Ann Burton-Brown (1868–1927) to the history of the archaeology of the Roman Forum as it was excavated between 1898 and 1905 under the direction of Giacomo Boni (1859–1925). Her English-language handbook on the discoveries, now overlooked in literature on Boni, showcased her education at Girton College, her experience with traditional cultures such as those of northern India, and her understanding of established and newly-emerging methods of classical archaeology. Unlike Esther van Deman and Eugénie Sellers Strong, who embraced careers in archaeology just years after Burton-Brown's publication, she did not pursue working in the discipline because of her personal situation. Secondly, it investigates the manner in which Burton-Brown received Boni's presentation of the excavations. Trained as an architect and experienced in architectural restoration, Boni brought innovative scientific methods to the task of uncovering Rome's archaic past. He did so while deliberately distancing himself from those scholars before him who applied traditional academic approaches, i.e., those reliant on classical literature, to archaeological practice. In large part, Burton-Brown's handbook echoes the descriptions and analyses of Boni's finds in the Roman Forum. However, a closer reading of her text reveals that her personal experiences shaped some of her explanations of the archaeological past in ways that differed from Boni's. In addition, their respective nationalities, British versus Italian, shade how they each value Rome's early history.","PeriodicalId":44228,"journal":{"name":"Papers of the British School at Rome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ETHEL ANN BURTON-BROWN WITH BONI IN THE FORUM, 1898–1904\",\"authors\":\"Susan M. Dixon\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0068246224000023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay has two objectives. First, it acknowledges and situates the contribution of Ethel Ann Burton-Brown (1868–1927) to the history of the archaeology of the Roman Forum as it was excavated between 1898 and 1905 under the direction of Giacomo Boni (1859–1925). Her English-language handbook on the discoveries, now overlooked in literature on Boni, showcased her education at Girton College, her experience with traditional cultures such as those of northern India, and her understanding of established and newly-emerging methods of classical archaeology. Unlike Esther van Deman and Eugénie Sellers Strong, who embraced careers in archaeology just years after Burton-Brown's publication, she did not pursue working in the discipline because of her personal situation. Secondly, it investigates the manner in which Burton-Brown received Boni's presentation of the excavations. Trained as an architect and experienced in architectural restoration, Boni brought innovative scientific methods to the task of uncovering Rome's archaic past. He did so while deliberately distancing himself from those scholars before him who applied traditional academic approaches, i.e., those reliant on classical literature, to archaeological practice. In large part, Burton-Brown's handbook echoes the descriptions and analyses of Boni's finds in the Roman Forum. However, a closer reading of her text reveals that her personal experiences shaped some of her explanations of the archaeological past in ways that differed from Boni's. In addition, their respective nationalities, British versus Italian, shade how they each value Rome's early history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Papers of the British School at Rome\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Papers of the British School at Rome\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0068246224000023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers of the British School at Rome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0068246224000023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文有两个目的。首先,它承认并介绍了埃塞尔-安-伯顿-布朗(1868-1927 年)对罗马广场考古史的贡献,1898 年至 1905 年期间,罗马广场在贾科莫-博尼(1859-1925 年)的指导下进行了发掘。她关于这些发现的英文手册展示了她在吉尔顿学院所受的教育、她对传统文化(如印度北部的传统文化)的经验,以及她对古典考古学既有方法和新兴方法的理解。与埃斯特-范-德曼(Esther van Deman)和尤金妮-塞勒斯-斯特朗(Eugénie Sellers Strong)不同的是,在伯顿-布朗的著作出版数年后,她才开始从事考古工作,她并没有因为个人情况而从事考古工作。其次,该书研究了伯顿-布朗是如何接受博尼对发掘工作的介绍的。博尼是一名建筑师,在建筑修复方面经验丰富,他将创新的科学方法运用到发掘罗马古老历史的任务中。他在这样做的同时,有意与之前那些将传统学术方法(即依赖古典文献的方法)应用于考古实践的学者保持距离。在很大程度上,伯顿-布朗的手册呼应了博尼对罗马广场发现的描述和分析。然而,仔细阅读她的文章就会发现,她的个人经历影响了她对考古过去的一些解释,与博尼的解释有所不同。此外,她们各自的国籍--英国人和意大利人--也影响了她们各自对罗马早期历史的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ETHEL ANN BURTON-BROWN WITH BONI IN THE FORUM, 1898–1904
This essay has two objectives. First, it acknowledges and situates the contribution of Ethel Ann Burton-Brown (1868–1927) to the history of the archaeology of the Roman Forum as it was excavated between 1898 and 1905 under the direction of Giacomo Boni (1859–1925). Her English-language handbook on the discoveries, now overlooked in literature on Boni, showcased her education at Girton College, her experience with traditional cultures such as those of northern India, and her understanding of established and newly-emerging methods of classical archaeology. Unlike Esther van Deman and Eugénie Sellers Strong, who embraced careers in archaeology just years after Burton-Brown's publication, she did not pursue working in the discipline because of her personal situation. Secondly, it investigates the manner in which Burton-Brown received Boni's presentation of the excavations. Trained as an architect and experienced in architectural restoration, Boni brought innovative scientific methods to the task of uncovering Rome's archaic past. He did so while deliberately distancing himself from those scholars before him who applied traditional academic approaches, i.e., those reliant on classical literature, to archaeological practice. In large part, Burton-Brown's handbook echoes the descriptions and analyses of Boni's finds in the Roman Forum. However, a closer reading of her text reveals that her personal experiences shaped some of her explanations of the archaeological past in ways that differed from Boni's. In addition, their respective nationalities, British versus Italian, shade how they each value Rome's early history.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Papers of the British School at Rome
Papers of the British School at Rome HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
期刊介绍: The Papers of the British School at Rome exists to publish work related to the archaeology, history and literature of Italy and other parts of the mediterranean area up to modern times, in the first instance by the staff of the School and by its present and former members. The Papers is edited by the Faculty of Archaeology, History and Letters of the Council of the BSR, and is a refereed journal.
期刊最新文献
PIRANESI'S CIRCUSES AND CARCERES: THE NEWLY DISCOVERED FIRST STATE OF THE CAMPUS MARTIUS PLAN AND ITS ANTIQUARIAN CONTEXT IL TEMPIO MONUMENTALE REPUBBLICANO DI FALERII NOVI: RICERCHE STORICO-TOPOGRAFICHE SULL'INSULA XXXI (AREA 4) NECROMANCY IN RENAISSANCE ROME THE MONUMENTALITY OF GLADIATORIAL GRAFFITI IN THE FLAVIAN AMPHITHEATRE: A CONTEXTUAL APPROACH WILLIAM GELL'S ENCOUNTERS WITH ISLAMIC SPAIN, 1808–36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1