使用超薄胃镜对食管下括约肌进行功能评估的内窥镜压力研究集成系统。

D. Azuma, Y. Shimamura, Haruhiro Inoue, Hitoshi Tanaka, Kei Ushikubo, Kazuki Yamamoto, Yoshiaki Kimoto, Hiroki Okada, Y. Nishikawa, I. Tanaka, M. Onimaru
{"title":"使用超薄胃镜对食管下括约肌进行功能评估的内窥镜压力研究集成系统。","authors":"D. Azuma, Y. Shimamura, Haruhiro Inoue, Hitoshi Tanaka, Kei Ushikubo, Kazuki Yamamoto, Yoshiaki Kimoto, Hiroki Okada, Y. Nishikawa, I. Tanaka, M. Onimaru","doi":"10.1111/den.14809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nThe endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) represents an innovative approach for evaluating lower esophageal sphincter function by monitoring intragastric pressure using diagnostic gastroscopes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of employing ultrathin gastroscopes for EPSIS.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective analysis was conducted on a database of consecutive patients who underwent EPSIS using both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes between September 2021 and October 2023. The study compared EPSIS parameters between the two gastroscope types to evaluate the correlation of key metrics.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThirty patients underwent EPSIS with both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes. Significant positive correlations were observed in the pressure waveform: maximum intragastric pressure (mmHg) (ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001) and intragastric pressure gradient (mmHg/s) (ρ = 0.80, P < 0.001) when comparing the two gastroscopes. Maximum intragastric pressure (15.5 [5.3-20.3] vs. 18.5 [3.4-21.6], P < 0.001) and pressure gradient (0.16 [0.013-0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.0039-1.13], P < 0.001), (median [range]) were significantly lower with ultrathin gastroscopes.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThis study establishes that EPSIS parameters obtained with an ultrathin gastroscope exhibit a significant correlation with those obtained using a regular gastroscope, with each EPSIS parameter consistently lower. These findings support the viability of EPSIS for ultrathin gastroscopy and highlight its potential as a diagnostic tool for assessing lower esophageal sphincter function.","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic pressure study integrated system using an ultrathin gastroscope for the functional assessment of the lower esophageal sphincter.\",\"authors\":\"D. Azuma, Y. Shimamura, Haruhiro Inoue, Hitoshi Tanaka, Kei Ushikubo, Kazuki Yamamoto, Yoshiaki Kimoto, Hiroki Okada, Y. Nishikawa, I. Tanaka, M. Onimaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.14809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\nThe endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) represents an innovative approach for evaluating lower esophageal sphincter function by monitoring intragastric pressure using diagnostic gastroscopes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of employing ultrathin gastroscopes for EPSIS.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA retrospective analysis was conducted on a database of consecutive patients who underwent EPSIS using both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes between September 2021 and October 2023. The study compared EPSIS parameters between the two gastroscope types to evaluate the correlation of key metrics.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThirty patients underwent EPSIS with both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes. Significant positive correlations were observed in the pressure waveform: maximum intragastric pressure (mmHg) (ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001) and intragastric pressure gradient (mmHg/s) (ρ = 0.80, P < 0.001) when comparing the two gastroscopes. Maximum intragastric pressure (15.5 [5.3-20.3] vs. 18.5 [3.4-21.6], P < 0.001) and pressure gradient (0.16 [0.013-0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.0039-1.13], P < 0.001), (median [range]) were significantly lower with ultrathin gastroscopes.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThis study establishes that EPSIS parameters obtained with an ultrathin gastroscope exhibit a significant correlation with those obtained using a regular gastroscope, with each EPSIS parameter consistently lower. These findings support the viability of EPSIS for ultrathin gastroscopy and highlight its potential as a diagnostic tool for assessing lower esophageal sphincter function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的内镜压力研究综合系统(EPSIS)是通过使用诊断胃镜监测胃内压力来评估食管下端括约肌功能的一种创新方法。本研究旨在评估使用超薄胃镜进行 EPSIS 的可行性和有效性。方法对 2021 年 9 月至 2023 年 10 月期间使用超薄胃镜和普通胃镜进行 EPSIS 的连续患者数据库进行了回顾性分析。研究比较了两种胃镜类型的 EPSIS 参数,以评估关键指标的相关性。结果30 名患者同时使用超薄胃镜和普通胃镜接受了 EPSIS。比较两种胃镜时,观察到压力波形:最大胃内压(mmHg)(ρ = 0.82,P < 0.001)和胃内压梯度(mmHg/s)(ρ = 0.80,P < 0.001)呈显著正相关。超薄胃镜的最大胃内压(15.5 [5.3-20.3] vs. 18.5 [3.4-21.6],P < 0.001)和压力梯度(0.16 [0.013-0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.0039-1.13],P < 0.001)(中位数[范围])明显低于超薄胃镜。结论本研究证实,使用超薄胃镜获得的 EPSIS 参数与使用普通胃镜获得的 EPSIS 参数具有显著的相关性,EPSIS 的每个参数都持续较低。这些发现证明了 EPSIS 在超薄胃镜检查中的可行性,并强调了其作为评估食管下端括约肌功能的诊断工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic pressure study integrated system using an ultrathin gastroscope for the functional assessment of the lower esophageal sphincter.
OBJECTIVES The endoscopic pressure study integrated system (EPSIS) represents an innovative approach for evaluating lower esophageal sphincter function by monitoring intragastric pressure using diagnostic gastroscopes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of employing ultrathin gastroscopes for EPSIS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on a database of consecutive patients who underwent EPSIS using both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes between September 2021 and October 2023. The study compared EPSIS parameters between the two gastroscope types to evaluate the correlation of key metrics. RESULTS Thirty patients underwent EPSIS with both ultrathin and regular gastroscopes. Significant positive correlations were observed in the pressure waveform: maximum intragastric pressure (mmHg) (ρ = 0.82, P < 0.001) and intragastric pressure gradient (mmHg/s) (ρ = 0.80, P < 0.001) when comparing the two gastroscopes. Maximum intragastric pressure (15.5 [5.3-20.3] vs. 18.5 [3.4-21.6], P < 0.001) and pressure gradient (0.16 [0.013-0.41] vs. 0.24 [0.0039-1.13], P < 0.001), (median [range]) were significantly lower with ultrathin gastroscopes. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes that EPSIS parameters obtained with an ultrathin gastroscope exhibit a significant correlation with those obtained using a regular gastroscope, with each EPSIS parameter consistently lower. These findings support the viability of EPSIS for ultrathin gastroscopy and highlight its potential as a diagnostic tool for assessing lower esophageal sphincter function.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic ability and adverse events of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy for gastric subepithelial tumors: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Is endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy better than surgical gastrojejunostomy or duodenal stenting? Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis. Proposal of classification and terminology of interventional endoscopic ultrasonography/endosonography. Comorbidity burden and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Multicenter study with nationwide data-based validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1