{"title":"这个世界的王国","authors":"Caleb A. Verbois","doi":"10.54669/001c.116328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stephen Wolfe’s The Case for Christian Nationalism and Patrick Deneen’s Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future express dissatisfaction, even anger, with contemporary America and the liberal tradition. Both authors believe America is fundamentally broken, and they appeal to pre-American sources to construct their alternative visions. Their alternatives, however, exhibit nostalgia for a past that arguably never existed, suffer from significant internal problems, and suggest ominous means to attain their respective ideals.","PeriodicalId":507887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Religion, Culture & Democracy","volume":"53 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Kingdom of This World\",\"authors\":\"Caleb A. Verbois\",\"doi\":\"10.54669/001c.116328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stephen Wolfe’s The Case for Christian Nationalism and Patrick Deneen’s Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future express dissatisfaction, even anger, with contemporary America and the liberal tradition. Both authors believe America is fundamentally broken, and they appeal to pre-American sources to construct their alternative visions. Their alternatives, however, exhibit nostalgia for a past that arguably never existed, suffer from significant internal problems, and suggest ominous means to attain their respective ideals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Religion, Culture & Democracy\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Religion, Culture & Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54669/001c.116328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Religion, Culture & Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54669/001c.116328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
斯蒂芬-沃尔夫（Stephen Wolfe）的《基督教民族主义案例》（The Case for Christian Nationalism）和帕特里克-德尼恩（Patrick Deneen）的《政权更迭：走向后自由主义的未来》表达了对当代美国和自由主义传统的不满，甚至是愤怒。两位作者都认为美国已经从根本上崩溃，他们诉诸美国以前的思想来源来构建自己的替代愿景。然而，他们的替代方案表现出对可以说从未存在过的过去的怀旧，存在严重的内部问题，并提出了实现各自理想的不祥手段。
Stephen Wolfe’s The Case for Christian Nationalism and Patrick Deneen’s Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future express dissatisfaction, even anger, with contemporary America and the liberal tradition. Both authors believe America is fundamentally broken, and they appeal to pre-American sources to construct their alternative visions. Their alternatives, however, exhibit nostalgia for a past that arguably never existed, suffer from significant internal problems, and suggest ominous means to attain their respective ideals.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
