第三届和第四届论证计算模型国际竞赛:设计、结果和分析

Stefano Bistarelli, Lars Kotthoff, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Emmanuel Lonca, Jean-Guy Mailly, J. Rossit, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi
{"title":"第三届和第四届论证计算模型国际竞赛:设计、结果和分析","authors":"Stefano Bistarelli, Lars Kotthoff, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Emmanuel Lonca, Jean-Guy Mailly, J. Rossit, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi","doi":"10.3233/aac-230013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA) focuses on reasoning tasks in abstract argumentation frameworks. Submitted solvers are tested on a selected collection of benchmark instances, including artificially generated argumentation frameworks and some frameworks formalizing real-world problems. This paper presents the novelties introduced in the organization of the Third (2019) and Fourth (2021) editions of the competition. In particular, we proposed new tracks to competitors, one dedicated to dynamic solvers (i.e., solvers that incrementally compute solutions of frameworks obtained by incrementally modifying original ones) in ICCMA’19 and one dedicated to approximate algorithms in ICCMA’21. From the analysis of the results, we noticed that i) dynamic recomputation of solutions leads to significant performance improvements, ii) approximation provides much faster results with satisfactory accuracy, and iii) classical solvers improved with respect to previous editions, thus revealing advancement in state of the art.","PeriodicalId":299930,"journal":{"name":"Argument & Computation","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The third and fourth international competitions on computational models of argumentation: Design, results and analysis\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Bistarelli, Lars Kotthoff, Jean-Marie Lagniez, Emmanuel Lonca, Jean-Guy Mailly, J. Rossit, Francesco Santini, Carlo Taticchi\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/aac-230013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA) focuses on reasoning tasks in abstract argumentation frameworks. Submitted solvers are tested on a selected collection of benchmark instances, including artificially generated argumentation frameworks and some frameworks formalizing real-world problems. This paper presents the novelties introduced in the organization of the Third (2019) and Fourth (2021) editions of the competition. In particular, we proposed new tracks to competitors, one dedicated to dynamic solvers (i.e., solvers that incrementally compute solutions of frameworks obtained by incrementally modifying original ones) in ICCMA’19 and one dedicated to approximate algorithms in ICCMA’21. From the analysis of the results, we noticed that i) dynamic recomputation of solutions leads to significant performance improvements, ii) approximation provides much faster results with satisfactory accuracy, and iii) classical solvers improved with respect to previous editions, thus revealing advancement in state of the art.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argument & Computation\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argument & Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-230013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argument & Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/aac-230013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

论证计算模型国际竞赛(ICCMA)的重点是抽象论证框架中的推理任务。提交的求解器将在一系列选定的基准实例上进行测试,其中包括人工生成的论证框架和一些形式化现实世界问题的框架。本文介绍了第三届(2019 年)和第四届(2021 年)竞赛组织工作中引入的新内容。特别是,我们为参赛者提出了新的赛道,一个是在ICCMA'19中专门针对动态求解器(即通过增量修改原始框架来增量计算框架解的求解器)的赛道,另一个是在ICCMA'21中专门针对近似算法的赛道。通过对结果的分析,我们注意到:i) 动态重新计算解带来了显著的性能提升;ii) 近似算法提供了更快的结果和令人满意的精确度;iii) 经典求解器与前几届相比有所改进,从而揭示了技术水平的进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The third and fourth international competitions on computational models of argumentation: Design, results and analysis
The International Competition on Computational Models of Argumentation (ICCMA) focuses on reasoning tasks in abstract argumentation frameworks. Submitted solvers are tested on a selected collection of benchmark instances, including artificially generated argumentation frameworks and some frameworks formalizing real-world problems. This paper presents the novelties introduced in the organization of the Third (2019) and Fourth (2021) editions of the competition. In particular, we proposed new tracks to competitors, one dedicated to dynamic solvers (i.e., solvers that incrementally compute solutions of frameworks obtained by incrementally modifying original ones) in ICCMA’19 and one dedicated to approximate algorithms in ICCMA’21. From the analysis of the results, we noticed that i) dynamic recomputation of solutions leads to significant performance improvements, ii) approximation provides much faster results with satisfactory accuracy, and iii) classical solvers improved with respect to previous editions, thus revealing advancement in state of the art.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A tribute to Trevor Bench-Capon (1953–2024) ω-Groundedness of argumentation and completeness of grounded dialectical proof procedures Evaluating large language models’ ability to generate interpretive arguments Annotated insights into legal reasoning: A dataset of Article 6 ECHR cases The third and fourth international competitions on computational models of argumentation: Design, results and analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1