中国、日本、韩国、新加坡、美国和德国小学数学教科书比较研究:分数除法 "案例研究

Hao Yang, Jiawen Li, Suiju Jia
{"title":"中国、日本、韩国、新加坡、美国和德国小学数学教科书比较研究:分数除法 \"案例研究","authors":"Hao Yang, Jiawen Li, Suiju Jia","doi":"10.9734/jamcs/2024/v39i51892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of this paper is to select 15 primary school mathematics textbooks from China, the United States, Singapore, Japan, South Korea and Germany, take \"fraction division\" as an example, and clarify the characteristics and similarities and differences of its operational meaning model and revelation methods of arithmetic reasoning in Fraction Division through literature method, content analysis method and comparative research method. The results show that there are great differences in these two aspects between different versions of teaching materials. Therefore, combining the national conditions of various countries, seeking common ground while reserving differences, provides a teaching path of fraction division based on national conditions and absorbing the advantages of different countries, and provides theoretical support for the better implementation of curriculum standards and textbooks.","PeriodicalId":503149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science","volume":"107 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks in China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, America, Germany: A Case Study on \\\"Fraction Division\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Hao Yang, Jiawen Li, Suiju Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.9734/jamcs/2024/v39i51892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main purpose of this paper is to select 15 primary school mathematics textbooks from China, the United States, Singapore, Japan, South Korea and Germany, take \\\"fraction division\\\" as an example, and clarify the characteristics and similarities and differences of its operational meaning model and revelation methods of arithmetic reasoning in Fraction Division through literature method, content analysis method and comparative research method. The results show that there are great differences in these two aspects between different versions of teaching materials. Therefore, combining the national conditions of various countries, seeking common ground while reserving differences, provides a teaching path of fraction division based on national conditions and absorbing the advantages of different countries, and provides theoretical support for the better implementation of curriculum standards and textbooks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":503149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"107 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9734/jamcs/2024/v39i51892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jamcs/2024/v39i51892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要选取中国、美国、新加坡、日本、韩国和德国的15种小学数学教材,以 "分数除法 "为例,通过文献资料法、内容分析法和比较研究法,阐明其分数除法运算意义模型和算理启示方法的特点和异同。结果表明,不同版本的教材在这两方面存在很大差异。因此,结合各国国情,求同存异,提供一条立足国情、吸收各国优势的分数除法教学路径,为更好地实施课程标准和教科书提供理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study of Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks in China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, America, Germany: A Case Study on "Fraction Division"
The main purpose of this paper is to select 15 primary school mathematics textbooks from China, the United States, Singapore, Japan, South Korea and Germany, take "fraction division" as an example, and clarify the characteristics and similarities and differences of its operational meaning model and revelation methods of arithmetic reasoning in Fraction Division through literature method, content analysis method and comparative research method. The results show that there are great differences in these two aspects between different versions of teaching materials. Therefore, combining the national conditions of various countries, seeking common ground while reserving differences, provides a teaching path of fraction division based on national conditions and absorbing the advantages of different countries, and provides theoretical support for the better implementation of curriculum standards and textbooks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks in China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, America, Germany: A Case Study on "Fraction Division" Mathematical Modeling of Diarrhea with Vaccination and Treatment Factors Analysis of Turing Instability of the Fitzhugh-Nagumo Model in Diffusive Network Uniform Estimates on Length of Programs and Computing Algorithmic Complexities for Quantitative Information Measures Common Fixed Points of Dass-Gupta Rational Contraction and E-Contraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1