将 BlockBuster 喉罩与 Air-Q 插管喉气道作为儿童光纤引导插管的导管进行比较:前瞻性随机对照研究。

Lipika Soni, Kanil Ranjith Kumar, R. Sinha, Arshad Ayub, Nishant Patel
{"title":"将 BlockBuster 喉罩与 Air-Q 插管喉气道作为儿童光纤引导插管的导管进行比较:前瞻性随机对照研究。","authors":"Lipika Soni, Kanil Ranjith Kumar, R. Sinha, Arshad Ayub, Nishant Patel","doi":"10.1111/pan.14906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe pediatric sizes of BlockBuster supraglottic airway (SGA) have been introduced recently. Its efficacy as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in children has not been assessed. Newer devices are often compared with Air-Q SGA to assess their intubating capability.\n\n\nAIMS\nThe primary objective was to compare the time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the BlockBuster and the Air-Q SGAs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSixty children aged 6 months to 12 years with normal airways were randomized into two groups: Air-Q SGA (Group A) and Blockbuster SGA (Group B). After administration of general anesthesia, an appropriately sized SGA was inserted. The time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the SGA, success, ease, and time for SGA insertion and removal were noted. The glottic view was graded by fiber-optic bronchoscopy.\n\n\nRESULTS\nDemographic parameters were comparable. The time to intubate with the BlockBuster 62.40 ± 17.2 s was comparable to the Air-Q 60.8 ± 18.5 s (mean difference 1.6 s, 95% CI -7.65 to10.85; p = .73). The average time for SGA insertion in BlockBuster and Air-Q was 14.57 ± 3.2 s and 16.67 ± 5.39 s, respectively (mean difference -2.1, 95% CI -4.39 to 0.19 s; p = .07). The first-attempt intubation success and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups, 96.7% and 100%, respectively. In Group B, 25/3/1/1/0 cases had a glottic view grade of 1/2/3/4/5, respectively. In Group A, 23/3/2/2/0 cases had grade of 1/2/3/4/5 glottic views respectively. The average time to SGA removal was comparable between the BlockBuster (20.17 ± 5.8 s) and the Air-Q (22.5 ± 12.8 s) groups (mean difference -2.3 s, 95% CI -7.5 to 2.82 s; p = .37). None of the children had any perioperative complications.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nBlockBuster SGA may be a useful alternative to Air-Q for SGA-assisted, fiber-optic-guided tracheal intubation in children.","PeriodicalId":281130,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric anaesthesia","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of BlockBuster laryngeal mask with Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for fiber-optic guided intubation in children: A prospective randomized controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Lipika Soni, Kanil Ranjith Kumar, R. Sinha, Arshad Ayub, Nishant Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.14906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe pediatric sizes of BlockBuster supraglottic airway (SGA) have been introduced recently. Its efficacy as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in children has not been assessed. Newer devices are often compared with Air-Q SGA to assess their intubating capability.\\n\\n\\nAIMS\\nThe primary objective was to compare the time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the BlockBuster and the Air-Q SGAs.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nSixty children aged 6 months to 12 years with normal airways were randomized into two groups: Air-Q SGA (Group A) and Blockbuster SGA (Group B). After administration of general anesthesia, an appropriately sized SGA was inserted. The time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the SGA, success, ease, and time for SGA insertion and removal were noted. The glottic view was graded by fiber-optic bronchoscopy.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nDemographic parameters were comparable. The time to intubate with the BlockBuster 62.40 ± 17.2 s was comparable to the Air-Q 60.8 ± 18.5 s (mean difference 1.6 s, 95% CI -7.65 to10.85; p = .73). The average time for SGA insertion in BlockBuster and Air-Q was 14.57 ± 3.2 s and 16.67 ± 5.39 s, respectively (mean difference -2.1, 95% CI -4.39 to 0.19 s; p = .07). The first-attempt intubation success and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups, 96.7% and 100%, respectively. In Group B, 25/3/1/1/0 cases had a glottic view grade of 1/2/3/4/5, respectively. In Group A, 23/3/2/2/0 cases had grade of 1/2/3/4/5 glottic views respectively. The average time to SGA removal was comparable between the BlockBuster (20.17 ± 5.8 s) and the Air-Q (22.5 ± 12.8 s) groups (mean difference -2.3 s, 95% CI -7.5 to 2.82 s; p = .37). None of the children had any perioperative complications.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nBlockBuster SGA may be a useful alternative to Air-Q for SGA-assisted, fiber-optic-guided tracheal intubation in children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景最近推出了儿童规格的 BlockBuster 声门上气道(SGA)。其作为儿童气管插管导管的功效尚未得到评估。目的主要是比较在光纤引导下通过 BlockBuster 和 Air-Q SGA 进行插管所需的时间。方法将 60 名年龄在 6 个月至 12 岁之间、气道正常的儿童随机分为两组:Air-Q SGA(A 组)和 Blockbuster SGA(B 组)。实施全身麻醉后,插入适当大小的 SGA。记录光纤引导下通过 SGA 插管所需的时间、插入和拔出 SGA 的成功率、难易程度和时间。结果 人口统计学参数相当。BlockBuster 62.40 ± 17.2 秒的插管时间与 Air-Q 60.8 ± 18.5 秒的插管时间相当(平均相差 1.6 秒,95% CI -7.65 至 10.85;p = .73)。BlockBuster 和 Air-Q 插入 SGA 的平均时间分别为 14.57 ± 3.2 秒和 16.67 ± 5.39 秒(平均差异 -2.1,95% CI -4.39 至 0.19 秒;p = .07)。两组的首次尝试插管成功率和总体插管成功率相当,分别为 96.7% 和 100%。在 B 组中,25/3/1/1/0 个病例的声门视野等级分别为 1/2/3/4/5 级。A 组中,23/3/2/2/0 个病例的声门视野等级分别为 1/2/3/4/5 级。BlockBuster组(20.17 ± 5.8 秒)和Air-Q组(22.5 ± 12.8 秒)移除SGA的平均时间相当(平均差异-2.3秒,95% CI -7.5至2.82秒;P = .37)。没有一名儿童在围手术期出现并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of BlockBuster laryngeal mask with Air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as a conduit for fiber-optic guided intubation in children: A prospective randomized controlled study.
BACKGROUND The pediatric sizes of BlockBuster supraglottic airway (SGA) have been introduced recently. Its efficacy as a conduit for endotracheal intubation in children has not been assessed. Newer devices are often compared with Air-Q SGA to assess their intubating capability. AIMS The primary objective was to compare the time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the BlockBuster and the Air-Q SGAs. METHODS Sixty children aged 6 months to 12 years with normal airways were randomized into two groups: Air-Q SGA (Group A) and Blockbuster SGA (Group B). After administration of general anesthesia, an appropriately sized SGA was inserted. The time taken for fiber-optic-guided intubation through the SGA, success, ease, and time for SGA insertion and removal were noted. The glottic view was graded by fiber-optic bronchoscopy. RESULTS Demographic parameters were comparable. The time to intubate with the BlockBuster 62.40 ± 17.2 s was comparable to the Air-Q 60.8 ± 18.5 s (mean difference 1.6 s, 95% CI -7.65 to10.85; p = .73). The average time for SGA insertion in BlockBuster and Air-Q was 14.57 ± 3.2 s and 16.67 ± 5.39 s, respectively (mean difference -2.1, 95% CI -4.39 to 0.19 s; p = .07). The first-attempt intubation success and overall intubation success rates were comparable in both groups, 96.7% and 100%, respectively. In Group B, 25/3/1/1/0 cases had a glottic view grade of 1/2/3/4/5, respectively. In Group A, 23/3/2/2/0 cases had grade of 1/2/3/4/5 glottic views respectively. The average time to SGA removal was comparable between the BlockBuster (20.17 ± 5.8 s) and the Air-Q (22.5 ± 12.8 s) groups (mean difference -2.3 s, 95% CI -7.5 to 2.82 s; p = .37). None of the children had any perioperative complications. CONCLUSION BlockBuster SGA may be a useful alternative to Air-Q for SGA-assisted, fiber-optic-guided tracheal intubation in children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The delivery and challenges of Pediatric Anesthesia within the humanitarian sector: Médecins Sans Frontières and Mercy Ships. Evaluation of parental anxiety following three methods of pre-anesthesia counseling: Video, brochure and verbal communication. Perioperative management and outcomes for posterior spinal fusion in patients with Friedreich ataxia: A single-center, retrospective study. Pediatric anesthesia in Australia and New Zealand and health inequity among First Nations and Māori children. Advances in pediatric anesthesia services over the past 10 years in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1