超声波与核磁共振成像在检测乳腺癌方面的比较:印度孟买医院的回顾性研究

Rajendra Singh, Aneel Kumar
{"title":"超声波与核磁共振成像在检测乳腺癌方面的比较:印度孟买医院的回顾性研究","authors":"Rajendra Singh, Aneel Kumar","doi":"10.59345/sjrir.v2i1.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women throughout the world. Early detection of breast cancer is very important to increase the chances of cure. Ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two imaging methods commonly used to detect breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in detecting breast cancer in female patients at Mumbai Hospital, India. \nMethods: A retrospective study was conducted on 2435 female patients who underwent ultrasound and MRI examinations at Mumbai Hospital, India between 2018 and 2023. Patient data was collected from electronic medical records and analyzed to compare the accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in detecting breast cancer. \nResults: The research results show that MRI is more accurate than ultrasound in detecting breast cancer. MRI sensitivity was 95.2%, while ultrasound sensitivity was 78.3%. The specificity of MRI was 98.7%, while the specificity of USG was 94.3%. The positive predictive value of MRI was 95.2%, while the positive predictive value of USG was 87.5%. The negative predictive value of MRI was 98.7%, while the negative predictive value of USG was 94.3%. \nConclusion: MRI is recommended as the primary imaging method for detecting breast cancer in female patients. Ultrasound can be used as a complementary method to MRI.","PeriodicalId":514882,"journal":{"name":"Sriwijaya Journal of Radiology and Imaging Research","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Ultrasound and MRI in Detecting Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study in Mumbai Hospitals, India\",\"authors\":\"Rajendra Singh, Aneel Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.59345/sjrir.v2i1.120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women throughout the world. Early detection of breast cancer is very important to increase the chances of cure. Ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two imaging methods commonly used to detect breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in detecting breast cancer in female patients at Mumbai Hospital, India. \\nMethods: A retrospective study was conducted on 2435 female patients who underwent ultrasound and MRI examinations at Mumbai Hospital, India between 2018 and 2023. Patient data was collected from electronic medical records and analyzed to compare the accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in detecting breast cancer. \\nResults: The research results show that MRI is more accurate than ultrasound in detecting breast cancer. MRI sensitivity was 95.2%, while ultrasound sensitivity was 78.3%. The specificity of MRI was 98.7%, while the specificity of USG was 94.3%. The positive predictive value of MRI was 95.2%, while the positive predictive value of USG was 87.5%. The negative predictive value of MRI was 98.7%, while the negative predictive value of USG was 94.3%. \\nConclusion: MRI is recommended as the primary imaging method for detecting breast cancer in female patients. Ultrasound can be used as a complementary method to MRI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sriwijaya Journal of Radiology and Imaging Research\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sriwijaya Journal of Radiology and Imaging Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59345/sjrir.v2i1.120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sriwijaya Journal of Radiology and Imaging Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59345/sjrir.v2i1.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言乳腺癌是全世界妇女最常见的癌症。早期发现乳腺癌对提高治愈率非常重要。超声波(USG)和磁共振成像(MRI)是两种常用于检测乳腺癌的成像方法。本研究旨在比较超声波和磁共振成像在检测印度孟买医院女性患者乳腺癌方面的准确性。研究方法对 2018 年至 2023 年期间在印度孟买医院接受超声波和核磁共振成像检查的 2435 名女性患者进行了回顾性研究。研究人员从电子病历中收集患者数据并进行分析,以比较超声波和核磁共振成像检测乳腺癌的准确性。结果显示研究结果表明,磁共振成像在检测乳腺癌方面比超声波更准确。磁共振成像的灵敏度为 95.2%,而超声波的灵敏度为 78.3%。磁共振成像的特异性为 98.7%,而超声波的特异性为 94.3%。核磁共振成像的阳性预测值为 95.2%,而 USG 的阳性预测值为 87.5%。磁共振成像的阴性预测值为 98.7%,而 USG 的阴性预测值为 94.3%。结论:建议将磁共振成像作为检测女性乳腺癌的主要成像方法。超声波可作为核磁共振成像的辅助方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Ultrasound and MRI in Detecting Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study in Mumbai Hospitals, India
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women throughout the world. Early detection of breast cancer is very important to increase the chances of cure. Ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are two imaging methods commonly used to detect breast cancer. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in detecting breast cancer in female patients at Mumbai Hospital, India. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 2435 female patients who underwent ultrasound and MRI examinations at Mumbai Hospital, India between 2018 and 2023. Patient data was collected from electronic medical records and analyzed to compare the accuracy of ultrasound and MRI in detecting breast cancer. Results: The research results show that MRI is more accurate than ultrasound in detecting breast cancer. MRI sensitivity was 95.2%, while ultrasound sensitivity was 78.3%. The specificity of MRI was 98.7%, while the specificity of USG was 94.3%. The positive predictive value of MRI was 95.2%, while the positive predictive value of USG was 87.5%. The negative predictive value of MRI was 98.7%, while the negative predictive value of USG was 94.3%. Conclusion: MRI is recommended as the primary imaging method for detecting breast cancer in female patients. Ultrasound can be used as a complementary method to MRI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical and Radiological Assessment of Patients with Lung Cancer Using Chest CT Scan: An Observational Study in a Barcelona Hospital, Spain Factors Contributing to the Accuracy of PET Scans in Detecting Cancer Metastases in Cairo Hospitals, Egypt Comparison of Ultrasound and MRI in Detecting Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study in Mumbai Hospitals, India Utilization of Biopsy-Guided CT Scan in Diagnosing Liver Cancer: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1