急诊医生在超声引导下实施腹腔穿刺术:回顾性分析

B. Wubben, Jad Dandashi, Omar Rizvi, Srikar Adhikari
{"title":"急诊医生在超声引导下实施腹腔穿刺术:回顾性分析","authors":"B. Wubben, Jad Dandashi, Omar Rizvi, Srikar Adhikari","doi":"10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Emergency physicians commonly perform ultrasound-assisted abdominal paracentesis, using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify ascites and select a site for needle insertion. However, ultrasound-guided paracentesis has the benefit of real-time needle visualization during the entire procedure. Our objective was to characterize the performance of emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided paracentesis using POCUS, their ability to achieve good in-plane needle visualization, and factors associated with procedural success. Methods: A POCUS database was retrospectively reviewed for examinations where abdominal paracentesis was performed by an emergency physician at two academic urban emergency departments over a six-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, presenting history, complications, and hospital course. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: 131 patients were included in the final analysis. The success rate for ultrasound-guided paracentesis was 97.7% (84/86 [95% CI: 92-100%]) compared to 95.6% (43/45 [95% CI: 85-99%]) for ultrasound-assisted paracentesis (p=0.503). 58% (50/86) demonstrated good in-plane needle visualization; 17% (15/86) had partial or out-of-plane visualization; and 24% (21/86) did not demonstrate needle visibility on their saved POCUS images. All four procedural failures were performed by first- or second-year residents using a curvilinear transducer, while all procedures using a linear transducer were successful. The most common complications were ascites leak, infection at the site, and minor bleeding. Conclusions: Emergency physicians with training in real-time needle guidance with ultrasound were able to use POCUS to perform ultrasound-guided paracentesis in the emergency department with a high success rate and no fatal complications. Based on our experience, we recommend performing ultrasound-guided paracentesis using a linear transducer, with attention to identifying vessels near the procedure site and maintaining sterile technique.","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"16 17","pages":"75 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis\",\"authors\":\"B. Wubben, Jad Dandashi, Omar Rizvi, Srikar Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: Emergency physicians commonly perform ultrasound-assisted abdominal paracentesis, using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify ascites and select a site for needle insertion. However, ultrasound-guided paracentesis has the benefit of real-time needle visualization during the entire procedure. Our objective was to characterize the performance of emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided paracentesis using POCUS, their ability to achieve good in-plane needle visualization, and factors associated with procedural success. Methods: A POCUS database was retrospectively reviewed for examinations where abdominal paracentesis was performed by an emergency physician at two academic urban emergency departments over a six-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, presenting history, complications, and hospital course. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: 131 patients were included in the final analysis. The success rate for ultrasound-guided paracentesis was 97.7% (84/86 [95% CI: 92-100%]) compared to 95.6% (43/45 [95% CI: 85-99%]) for ultrasound-assisted paracentesis (p=0.503). 58% (50/86) demonstrated good in-plane needle visualization; 17% (15/86) had partial or out-of-plane visualization; and 24% (21/86) did not demonstrate needle visibility on their saved POCUS images. All four procedural failures were performed by first- or second-year residents using a curvilinear transducer, while all procedures using a linear transducer were successful. The most common complications were ascites leak, infection at the site, and minor bleeding. Conclusions: Emergency physicians with training in real-time needle guidance with ultrasound were able to use POCUS to perform ultrasound-guided paracentesis in the emergency department with a high success rate and no fatal complications. Based on our experience, we recommend performing ultrasound-guided paracentesis using a linear transducer, with attention to identifying vessels near the procedure site and maintaining sterile technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74470,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POCUS journal\",\"volume\":\"16 17\",\"pages\":\"75 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POCUS journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 背景:急诊医生通常在超声辅助下进行腹腔穿刺术,使用护理点超声(POCUS)识别腹水并选择穿刺针插入部位。然而,超声引导腹腔穿刺术的优点是在整个过程中可实时看到穿刺针。我们的目的是描述急诊医生使用 POCUS 在超声引导下进行腹腔穿刺术的表现、他们实现良好的平面内穿刺针可视化的能力以及与手术成功相关的因素。方法:回顾性分析 POCUS 数据库:对两个城市学术急诊科六年来由急诊医生实施腹腔穿刺术的 POCUS 数据库进行了回顾性审查。对病历中的人口统计学特征、病史、并发症和住院过程进行了审查。采用描述性统计对数据进行总结。结果:最终分析包括 131 名患者。超声引导下的腹腔穿刺成功率为 97.7%(84/86 [95% CI:92-100%]),而超声辅助下的腹腔穿刺成功率为 95.6%(43/45 [95% CI:85-99%])(P=0.503)。58%(50/86)的患者显示出良好的平面内针显像;17%(15/86)的患者显示出部分或平面外显像;24%(21/86)的患者在保存的 POCUS 图像中未显示出针显像。所有四次手术失败都是由一年级或二年级住院医师使用曲线传感器进行的,而所有使用线性传感器的手术都很成功。最常见的并发症是腹水漏出、手术部位感染和轻微出血。结论:接受过超声实时针引导培训的急诊医生能够在急诊科使用 POCUS 进行超声引导下的腹腔穿刺术,且成功率高,无致命并发症。根据我们的经验,我们建议使用线性传感器进行超声引导下的腹腔穿刺术,同时注意识别手术部位附近的血管并保持无菌技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis
Abstract Background: Emergency physicians commonly perform ultrasound-assisted abdominal paracentesis, using point of care ultrasound (POCUS) to identify ascites and select a site for needle insertion. However, ultrasound-guided paracentesis has the benefit of real-time needle visualization during the entire procedure. Our objective was to characterize the performance of emergency physician-performed ultrasound-guided paracentesis using POCUS, their ability to achieve good in-plane needle visualization, and factors associated with procedural success. Methods: A POCUS database was retrospectively reviewed for examinations where abdominal paracentesis was performed by an emergency physician at two academic urban emergency departments over a six-year period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, presenting history, complications, and hospital course. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Results: 131 patients were included in the final analysis. The success rate for ultrasound-guided paracentesis was 97.7% (84/86 [95% CI: 92-100%]) compared to 95.6% (43/45 [95% CI: 85-99%]) for ultrasound-assisted paracentesis (p=0.503). 58% (50/86) demonstrated good in-plane needle visualization; 17% (15/86) had partial or out-of-plane visualization; and 24% (21/86) did not demonstrate needle visibility on their saved POCUS images. All four procedural failures were performed by first- or second-year residents using a curvilinear transducer, while all procedures using a linear transducer were successful. The most common complications were ascites leak, infection at the site, and minor bleeding. Conclusions: Emergency physicians with training in real-time needle guidance with ultrasound were able to use POCUS to perform ultrasound-guided paracentesis in the emergency department with a high success rate and no fatal complications. Based on our experience, we recommend performing ultrasound-guided paracentesis using a linear transducer, with attention to identifying vessels near the procedure site and maintaining sterile technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Application of Point of Care Ultrasound to Screen for Pulmonary Hypertension: A Narrative Review VExUS to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis: Exploring a Novel Dimension of Point of Care Ultrasound Best Practices for Point of Care Ultrasound: An Interdisciplinary Expert Consensus Return of the Living Dead Gut – A Case Report of Ischemic Colitis Identified on Point of Care Ultrasound Emergency Physician Performed Ultrasound-Guided Abdominal Paracentesis: A Retrospective Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1