伊莎贝尔/人类逻辑中的斯塔尔纳克认识逻辑

Laura P. Gamboa Guzman, Kristin Y. Rozier
{"title":"伊莎贝尔/人类逻辑中的斯塔尔纳克认识逻辑","authors":"Laura P. Gamboa Guzman, Kristin Y. Rozier","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.402.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The foundations of formal models for epistemic and doxastic logics often rely on certain logical aspects of modal logics such as S4 and S4.2 and their semantics; however, the corresponding mathematical results are often stated in papers or books without including a detailed proof, or a reference to it, that allows the reader to convince themselves about them. We reinforce the foundations of the epistemic logic S4.2 for countably many agents by formalizing its soundness and completeness results for the class of all weakly-directed pre-orders in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. This logic corresponds to the knowledge fragment, i.e., the logic for formulas that may only include knowledge modalities in Stalnaker's system for knowledge and belief. Additionally, we formalize the equivalence between two axiomatizations for S4, which are used depending on the type of semantics given to the modal operators, as one is commonly used for the relational semantics, and the other one arises naturally from the topological semantics.","PeriodicalId":30085,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stalnaker's Epistemic Logic in Isabelle/HOL\",\"authors\":\"Laura P. Gamboa Guzman, Kristin Y. Rozier\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.402.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The foundations of formal models for epistemic and doxastic logics often rely on certain logical aspects of modal logics such as S4 and S4.2 and their semantics; however, the corresponding mathematical results are often stated in papers or books without including a detailed proof, or a reference to it, that allows the reader to convince themselves about them. We reinforce the foundations of the epistemic logic S4.2 for countably many agents by formalizing its soundness and completeness results for the class of all weakly-directed pre-orders in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. This logic corresponds to the knowledge fragment, i.e., the logic for formulas that may only include knowledge modalities in Stalnaker's system for knowledge and belief. Additionally, we formalize the equivalence between two axiomatizations for S4, which are used depending on the type of semantics given to the modal operators, as one is commonly used for the relational semantics, and the other one arises naturally from the topological semantics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.402.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.402.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认识论和哆嗦逻辑的形式化模型的基础往往依赖于模态逻辑的某些逻辑方面,如S4和S4.2及其语义;然而,相应的数学结果往往在论文或书本中陈述,却不包括详细的证明,或者不提供证明的参考,让读者自己去说服自己。我们通过在证明助手 Isabelle/HOL 中形式化所有弱定向前序类的健全性和完备性结果,加强了可数代理的认识论逻辑 S4.2 的基础。这个逻辑对应于知识片段,即在斯塔尔纳克的知识与信念系统中只包含知识模态的公式逻辑。此外,我们还形式化了 S4 的两种公理化之间的等价性,这两种公理化的使用取决于模态算子的语义类型,其中一种常用于关系语义,另一种则自然产生于拓扑语义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stalnaker's Epistemic Logic in Isabelle/HOL
The foundations of formal models for epistemic and doxastic logics often rely on certain logical aspects of modal logics such as S4 and S4.2 and their semantics; however, the corresponding mathematical results are often stated in papers or books without including a detailed proof, or a reference to it, that allows the reader to convince themselves about them. We reinforce the foundations of the epistemic logic S4.2 for countably many agents by formalizing its soundness and completeness results for the class of all weakly-directed pre-orders in the proof assistant Isabelle/HOL. This logic corresponds to the knowledge fragment, i.e., the logic for formulas that may only include knowledge modalities in Stalnaker's system for knowledge and belief. Additionally, we formalize the equivalence between two axiomatizations for S4, which are used depending on the type of semantics given to the modal operators, as one is commonly used for the relational semantics, and the other one arises naturally from the topological semantics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pauli Flow on Open Graphs with Unknown Measurement Labels Quantum Algorithms for Compositional Text Processing Density Matrices for Metaphor Understanding Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic Programming Language Case Studies Can Be Deep
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1