某种 PBX 炸药的多层传单冲击起爆数值模拟

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1002/prep.202300252
Jingyao Yuan, Yingliang Duan, Yong Han
{"title":"某种 PBX 炸药的多层传单冲击起爆数值模拟","authors":"Jingyao Yuan, Yingliang Duan, Yong Han","doi":"10.1002/prep.202300252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the problem of multi‐layer flyer impact‐induced initiation of a high‐energy explosive PBX‐1(based on 95 % TATB). The CREST reaction combustion model based on the time‐step difference method is embedded in LS‐DYNA, and the pressure history of PBX‐1 in multiple impact initiation is numerically simulated. The strengths and weaknesses of the two models are analyzed by comparing the simulation results of the pressure‐based IG model and the entropy‐based CREST model in multiple impact initiation. The results show that the CREST model is significantly better than the IG model in the problem of multiple impact initiation of PBX‐1, and it matches the experimental results better.","PeriodicalId":20800,"journal":{"name":"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical simulation of multi‐layer flyer impact initiation of a certain PBX explosive\",\"authors\":\"Jingyao Yuan, Yingliang Duan, Yong Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prep.202300252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses the problem of multi‐layer flyer impact‐induced initiation of a high‐energy explosive PBX‐1(based on 95 % TATB). The CREST reaction combustion model based on the time‐step difference method is embedded in LS‐DYNA, and the pressure history of PBX‐1 in multiple impact initiation is numerically simulated. The strengths and weaknesses of the two models are analyzed by comparing the simulation results of the pressure‐based IG model and the entropy‐based CREST model in multiple impact initiation. The results show that the CREST model is significantly better than the IG model in the problem of multiple impact initiation of PBX‐1, and it matches the experimental results better.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.202300252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了高能炸药 PBX-1(基于 95 % TATB)的多层飞鸟冲击起爆问题。在 LS-DYNA 中嵌入了基于时差法的 CREST 反应燃烧模型,并对 PBX-1 在多次冲击起爆中的压力历史进行了数值模拟。通过比较基于压力的 IG 模型和基于熵的 CREST 模型在多次冲击起爆中的模拟结果,分析了两种模型的优缺点。结果表明,在 PBX-1 的多次冲击起爆问题上,CREST 模型明显优于 IG 模型,而且与实验结果更匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical simulation of multi‐layer flyer impact initiation of a certain PBX explosive
This paper addresses the problem of multi‐layer flyer impact‐induced initiation of a high‐energy explosive PBX‐1(based on 95 % TATB). The CREST reaction combustion model based on the time‐step difference method is embedded in LS‐DYNA, and the pressure history of PBX‐1 in multiple impact initiation is numerically simulated. The strengths and weaknesses of the two models are analyzed by comparing the simulation results of the pressure‐based IG model and the entropy‐based CREST model in multiple impact initiation. The results show that the CREST model is significantly better than the IG model in the problem of multiple impact initiation of PBX‐1, and it matches the experimental results better.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics
Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
235
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics (PEP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal containing Full Papers, Short Communications, critical Reviews, as well as details of forthcoming meetings and book reviews concerned with the research, development and production in relation to propellants, explosives, and pyrotechnics for all applications. Being the official journal of the International Pyrotechnics Society, PEP is a vital medium and the state-of-the-art forum for the exchange of science and technology in energetic materials. PEP is published 12 times a year. PEP is devoted to advancing the science, technology and engineering elements in the storage and manipulation of chemical energy, specifically in propellants, explosives and pyrotechnics. Articles should provide scientific context, articulate impact, and be generally applicable to the energetic materials and wider scientific community. PEP is not a defense journal and does not feature the weaponization of materials and related systems or include information that would aid in the development or utilization of improvised explosive systems, e.g., synthesis routes to terrorist explosives.
期刊最新文献
Forthcoming Meetings: 9/2024 Contents: Prop., Explos., Pyrotech. 9/2024 Wiley PEP Speaker Award 2024 Cover Picture: (Prop., Explos., Pyrotech. 9/2024) Future Articles: Prop., Explos., Pyrotech. 9/2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1