我们应该在办公室测量多少次血压?

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1111/jch.14825
Gülsüm Özkan MD, Şükrü Ulusoy MD, Rahmi Yılmaz MD, Serpil Müge Değer MD, Ülver Derici MD, Turgay Arınsoy MD, Yunus Erdem MD, Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal Diseases
{"title":"我们应该在办公室测量多少次血压?","authors":"Gülsüm Özkan MD,&nbsp;Şükrü Ulusoy MD,&nbsp;Rahmi Yılmaz MD,&nbsp;Serpil Müge Değer MD,&nbsp;Ülver Derici MD,&nbsp;Turgay Arınsoy MD,&nbsp;Yunus Erdem MD,&nbsp;Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal Diseases","doi":"10.1111/jch.14825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>No consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension. The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24-h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients followed up in the posthoc analysis of the Cappadocia hypertension cohort. A total 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> BP), G2 (average of the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup>), G3 (average of the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 4<sup>th</sup>), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4<sup>th</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup>), and G5 (average of all five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24-h ABPM data was examined. While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24-h ABPM SBP and G1 (<i>p</i> = .002), no difference was found in the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24-h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24-h ABPM DBP (<i>p</i> = .000 for all). In light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1<sup>st</sup> value being included in the average.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.14825","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many blood pressure measurements should we take in the office?\",\"authors\":\"Gülsüm Özkan MD,&nbsp;Şükrü Ulusoy MD,&nbsp;Rahmi Yılmaz MD,&nbsp;Serpil Müge Değer MD,&nbsp;Ülver Derici MD,&nbsp;Turgay Arınsoy MD,&nbsp;Yunus Erdem MD,&nbsp;Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal Diseases\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.14825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>No consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension. The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24-h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients followed up in the posthoc analysis of the Cappadocia hypertension cohort. A total 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1<sup>st</sup> and 2<sup>nd</sup> BP), G2 (average of the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup>), G3 (average of the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 3<sup>rd</sup>, and 4<sup>th</sup>), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4<sup>th</sup>, and 5<sup>th</sup>), and G5 (average of all five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24-h ABPM data was examined. While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24-h ABPM SBP and G1 (<i>p</i> = .002), no difference was found in the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24-h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24-h ABPM DBP (<i>p</i> = .000 for all). In light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2<sup>nd</sup> and 3<sup>rd</sup> measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1<sup>st</sup> value being included in the average.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.14825\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14825\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于在诊室就诊时应测量多少次血压(BP)以诊断高血压,不同指南之间尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是在卡帕多西亚高血压队列的事后分析中,对随访患者进行多次平均诊室血压测量和 24 小时血压监测 (ABPM) 的兼容性进行研究。共对 207 名患者的 1158 次诊室血压测量结果进行了检查。然后将结果分为 G1(第 1 次和第 2 次血压的平均值)、G2(第 2 次和第 3 次血压的平均值)、G3(第 2 次、第 3 次和第 4 次血压的平均值)、G4(第 2 次、第 3 次、第 4 次和第 5 次血压的平均值)和 G5(所有五次测量的平均值)。检查了各组平均值与同时进行的 24 小时 ABPM 数据之间的兼容性。虽然观察到日间 24 小时 ABPM SBP 与 G1 之间存在明显差异(p = .002),但在其他组中未发现差异。随着五组测量次数的增加,办公室 DBP 接近于日间 24 小时 ABPM 值,尽管所有组的平均办公室 DBP 数据均高于日间 24 小时 ABPM DBP(所有组的 p = .000)。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议进行三次办公室血压测量,并使用第 2 次和第 3 次测量的平均值来计算 SBP,而对于 DBP,我们建议尽可能多地进行测量,而不将第 1 次测量的值计入平均值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How many blood pressure measurements should we take in the office?

No consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension. The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24-h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients followed up in the posthoc analysis of the Cappadocia hypertension cohort. A total 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1st and 2nd BP), G2 (average of the 2nd and 3rd), G3 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th), and G5 (average of all five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24-h ABPM data was examined. While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24-h ABPM SBP and G1 (p = .002), no difference was found in the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24-h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24-h ABPM DBP (p = .000 for all). In light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2nd and 3rd measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1st value being included in the average.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
期刊最新文献
Agreement between resting heart rate measured by unattended automated office and office blood pressure measurement, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, or electrocardiography. Blood L-cystine levels positively related to increased risk of hypertension. The Relationships Among Atherogenic Index of Plasma and Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in Adults. U-shaped Association Between Weight-Adjusted-Waist Index and Arterial Stiffness Among Adult Hypertensive Patients: A Population-Based Study in the United States. Association Between Triglyceride Glucose Index and Chronic Kidney Disease in Normal-Weight Chinese Adults With Hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1