内镜粘膜下切口术后凝血综合征的风险预测

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.1159/000539007
Minjee Kim, Chang Wan Choi, E. Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, S. Hong
{"title":"内镜粘膜下切口术后凝血综合征的风险预测","authors":"Minjee Kim, Chang Wan Choi, E. Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, S. Hong","doi":"10.1159/000539007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been popular worldwide to treat laterally spreading tumors and large polyps. Post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) is more common than the two major ESD-related complications, perforation and bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PECS, identify the risk factors for PECS, and create a risk prediction model for PECS.\n\n\nMETHODS\nRetrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 986 patients who underwent colorectal ESD. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors with PECS. Each risk factor was scored and the 3-step risk stratification index of prediction model was assessed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe prevalence of PECS was 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.9%-24.1%). The risk factors of PECS in the multivariate logistic regression were tumor size (+1 cm: odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16 to 7.09), cecal lesion (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.53), procedure time (+30 minutes: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.39), and ESD with snaring (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.95). Applying a simplified weighted scoring system based on adjusted OR increments of 1, the risk of PECS was 12.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-16.0%) for the low-risk group (score ≤ 4) and was 36.0% (95% CI=29.4%-43.2%) for the high-risk group (score ≥ 8). Overall discrimination (C-statistic=0.629; 95% CI=0.585-0.672) and calibration (p = 0.993) of the model were moderate to good.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPECS occurs frequently and the prediction model can be helpful for effective treatment and prevention of PECS.","PeriodicalId":11294,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Coagulation Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Minjee Kim, Chang Wan Choi, E. Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, S. Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000539007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been popular worldwide to treat laterally spreading tumors and large polyps. Post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) is more common than the two major ESD-related complications, perforation and bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PECS, identify the risk factors for PECS, and create a risk prediction model for PECS.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nRetrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 986 patients who underwent colorectal ESD. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors with PECS. Each risk factor was scored and the 3-step risk stratification index of prediction model was assessed.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe prevalence of PECS was 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.9%-24.1%). The risk factors of PECS in the multivariate logistic regression were tumor size (+1 cm: odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16 to 7.09), cecal lesion (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.53), procedure time (+30 minutes: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.39), and ESD with snaring (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.95). Applying a simplified weighted scoring system based on adjusted OR increments of 1, the risk of PECS was 12.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-16.0%) for the low-risk group (score ≤ 4) and was 36.0% (95% CI=29.4%-43.2%) for the high-risk group (score ≥ 8). Overall discrimination (C-statistic=0.629; 95% CI=0.585-0.672) and calibration (p = 0.993) of the model were moderate to good.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nPECS occurs frequently and the prediction model can be helpful for effective treatment and prevention of PECS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)用于治疗侧向扩散的肿瘤和大息肉,在全世界都很流行。ESD术后凝血综合征(PECS)比ESD相关的两大并发症穿孔和出血更为常见。本研究旨在评估 PECS 的发病率,确定 PECS 的风险因素,并建立 PECS 风险预测模型。采用逻辑回归模型评估 PECS 的风险因素。结果PECS的患病率为21.4%(95%置信区间[CI]=18.9%-24.1%)。在多变量逻辑回归中,PECS的风险因素为肿瘤大小(+1厘米:几率比[OR],1.29;95% CI,1.16-7.09)、盲肠病变(OR,1.96;95% CI,1.09-1.53)、手术时间(+30分钟:OR,1.19;95% CI,1.02-1.39)和ESD与窒息(OR,0.64;95% CI,0.43-0.95)。应用基于调整 OR 增量为 1 的简化加权评分系统,低风险组(评分≤ 4)的 PECS 风险为 12.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-16.0%) ,高风险组(评分≥ 8)的 PECS 风险为 36.0% (95% CI=29.4%-43.2%) 。该模型的总体区分度(C统计量=0.629;95% CI=0.585-0.672)和校准度(p=0.993)为中到良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Coagulation Syndrome.
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been popular worldwide to treat laterally spreading tumors and large polyps. Post-ESD coagulation syndrome (PECS) is more common than the two major ESD-related complications, perforation and bleeding. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PECS, identify the risk factors for PECS, and create a risk prediction model for PECS. METHODS Retrospective cross-sectional study analyzed a total of 986 patients who underwent colorectal ESD. Logistic regression models were used to assess risk factors with PECS. Each risk factor was scored and the 3-step risk stratification index of prediction model was assessed. RESULTS The prevalence of PECS was 21.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.9%-24.1%). The risk factors of PECS in the multivariate logistic regression were tumor size (+1 cm: odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.16 to 7.09), cecal lesion (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.53), procedure time (+30 minutes: OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.39), and ESD with snaring (OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.95). Applying a simplified weighted scoring system based on adjusted OR increments of 1, the risk of PECS was 12.3% (95% CI, 0.3%-16.0%) for the low-risk group (score ≤ 4) and was 36.0% (95% CI=29.4%-43.2%) for the high-risk group (score ≥ 8). Overall discrimination (C-statistic=0.629; 95% CI=0.585-0.672) and calibration (p = 0.993) of the model were moderate to good. CONCLUSION PECS occurs frequently and the prediction model can be helpful for effective treatment and prevention of PECS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases
Digestive Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Each issue of this journal is dedicated to a special topic of current interest, covering both clinical and basic science topics in gastrointestinal function and disorders. The contents of each issue are comprehensive and reflect the state of the art, featuring editorials, reviews, mini reviews and original papers. These individual contributions encompass a variety of disciplines including all fields of gastroenterology. ''Digestive Diseases'' bridges the communication gap between advances made in the academic setting and their application in patient care. The journal is a valuable service for clinicians, specialists and physicians-in-training.
期刊最新文献
Esophageal varices as an independent predictor of fatal outcomes after balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration in patients with hepatic encephalopathy. Efficacy of Beclomethasone Dipropionate in Lowering Fecal Calprotectin Levels in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Remission and at Risk of Relapse: The Becalcu Randomized, Controlled Trial. Prevalence of Helminth Infections in Patients with Celiac Disease. Adverse Events after Different Endoscopic Resection Procedures for Small and Intermediate-Sized Colorectal Polyps. Is Cholecystectomy Necessary after Choledocholithiasis Treatment for the Elderly or Patients with Many Comorbidities?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1