我们必须改变,他们却一成不变

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of International Students Pub Date : 2024-04-21 DOI:10.32674/jis.v14i3.6466
Mingxin Qu, Xianlin Song
{"title":"我们必须改变,他们却一成不变","authors":"Mingxin Qu, Xianlin Song","doi":"10.32674/jis.v14i3.6466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Overseas student integration and difficulties in adjusting into the academic life of the host country are often posited as personal failures, and international education scholarship focuses heavily on the notion of failure. However, the categorization of international students is premised on them not being active subjects in the curriculum and the ways in which they can contribute to internationalization of higher education. The current study addresses this negative characterization through qualitative methodology, observing and interviewing 24 Chinese international students at an Australian university. Conducted during the COVID pandemic period, this study offers new insights into how the shift to online learning exacerbated the failure of the teaching, learning, and curriculum models that predominate in Australian universities. We call for a rethinking of international students’ education; as the pandemic subsides, deeper conversations are necessary over the continued prevalence of the deficit model while considering international students’ agency in their learning practices.","PeriodicalId":46680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Students","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"We have to change; they stay the same\",\"authors\":\"Mingxin Qu, Xianlin Song\",\"doi\":\"10.32674/jis.v14i3.6466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Overseas student integration and difficulties in adjusting into the academic life of the host country are often posited as personal failures, and international education scholarship focuses heavily on the notion of failure. However, the categorization of international students is premised on them not being active subjects in the curriculum and the ways in which they can contribute to internationalization of higher education. The current study addresses this negative characterization through qualitative methodology, observing and interviewing 24 Chinese international students at an Australian university. Conducted during the COVID pandemic period, this study offers new insights into how the shift to online learning exacerbated the failure of the teaching, learning, and curriculum models that predominate in Australian universities. We call for a rethinking of international students’ education; as the pandemic subsides, deeper conversations are necessary over the continued prevalence of the deficit model while considering international students’ agency in their learning practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Students\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Students\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v14i3.6466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v14i3.6466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海外学生融入和适应东道国学术生活的困难往往被认为是个人的失败,国际教育学术研究也非常关注失败的概念。然而,对留学生进行分类的前提是他们不是课程的积极主体,以及他们可以为高等教育国际化做出贡献的方式。本研究通过定性方法,对澳大利亚一所大学的 24 名中国留学生进行了观察和访谈,以解决这一负面定性问题。本研究是在 COVID 大流行期间进行的,为了解向在线学习的转变如何加剧了澳大利亚大学中占主导地位的教学、学习和课程模式的失败提供了新的见解。我们呼吁重新思考留学生的教育问题;随着大流行病的消退,有必要就赤字模式的持续盛行进行更深入的讨论,同时考虑留学生在学习实践中的能动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
We have to change; they stay the same
Overseas student integration and difficulties in adjusting into the academic life of the host country are often posited as personal failures, and international education scholarship focuses heavily on the notion of failure. However, the categorization of international students is premised on them not being active subjects in the curriculum and the ways in which they can contribute to internationalization of higher education. The current study addresses this negative characterization through qualitative methodology, observing and interviewing 24 Chinese international students at an Australian university. Conducted during the COVID pandemic period, this study offers new insights into how the shift to online learning exacerbated the failure of the teaching, learning, and curriculum models that predominate in Australian universities. We call for a rethinking of international students’ education; as the pandemic subsides, deeper conversations are necessary over the continued prevalence of the deficit model while considering international students’ agency in their learning practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Students
Journal of International Students EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes scholarly peer-reviewed articles on international students in tertiary education, secondary education, and other educational settings that make significant contributions to research, policy, and practice in the internationalization of education worldwide. We encourage the submission of manuscripts from researchers and practitioners around the world from a myriad of academic fields and theoretical perspectives, including international education, comparative education, human geography, global studies, linguistics, psychology, sociology, communication, international business, economics, social work, cultural studies, and other related disciplines. We are especially interested in submissions which mark a new and demonstratively significant advancement in research on international students on topics such as: Cross-cultural studies of acculturation, intergroup relations, and intercultural communication Career preparation, employability, and career outcomes of short- and long-term mobility Development of international student social networks Emerging trends related to the mobility of international students and scholars English-mediated instruction (EMI) and second language acquisition (L2) Experiences of globally mobile LGBTQ+ students and other student populations Geopolitical perspectives and policies related to international students and other immigrants seeking education Global learning involving diverse people collaboratively analyzing and addressing complex problems that transcend borders International faculty, teaching assistants, and postdoctoral researchers Multicultural, intercultural, and cross-cultural engagement New educational contexts that involve the use of emerging technologies and online learning International student experiences in transnational higher education providers and programs.
期刊最新文献
Belonging as a post-secondary inter/national student Caught in the geopolitical tensions between China and the United States Motivation and experiences of studying creative arts therapy among Chinese doctoral students in South Korea Cross-cultural challenges faced by international students International students' satisfaction perception of administrative services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1