使用 12 毫米球囊过度扩张 10 毫米 Viatorr 经颈静脉肝内门体分流支架的安全性和有效性

M. M. Tahir, Trevor K. Lewis, Aamir Ali, M. Hsu, Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Muneeb Ahmed, Ammar Sarwar
{"title":"使用 12 毫米球囊过度扩张 10 毫米 Viatorr 经颈静脉肝内门体分流支架的安全性和有效性","authors":"M. M. Tahir, Trevor K. Lewis, Aamir Ali, M. Hsu, Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Muneeb Ahmed, Ammar Sarwar","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1782662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate overdilation of 10-mm standard and 8–10 mm controlled-expansion Viatorr stents to 12 mm during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement when insufficient reduction (<50%) in portosystemic gradient (PSG) is achieved with standard 10 mm dilation.\n Materials and Methods It is a single-institution, institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of TIPS (2013–2022) to identify patients in the overdilation group (12 mm dilation of a 10-mm stent) and a control group (10 mm dilation of a 10-mm stent) matched for age, indication, stent type, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, pre-TIPS PSG, and variceal embolization. Stent diameter, technical success, clinical outcomes, and adverse events were assessed for both groups.\n Results TIPS was created for the overdilation group (n = 35, 57 ± 11 years, 69% male; MELD: 14 ± 5) and control group (n = 35, 57 ± 11 years, 83% male; MELD: 14 ± 5). Overdilation to 12 mm adequately reduced PSG by more than 50% (55 vs. 65% in the control group, p = 0.11). The stent diameter was larger in the overdilation group on cross-sectional imaging (9.8 ± 0.2 vs. 9.5 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001), with an estimated 57% higher volume flow rate (p = 0.002). Patients were followed for a median of 11.3 months (range: 0.03–75) and 15.6 months (range: 0.03–106) in the overdilation and control groups, respectively. There was an equivalent rate of ascites resolution (56 vs. 63%, p = 0.68) and rebleeding (13 vs. 17%, p = 0.82) in the overdilation and control groups, with a similar risk of new-onset hepatic encephalopathy (41 vs. 33%, p = 0.51) and TIPS occlusion (11 vs. 9%, p = 0.69). Overdilation did not result in any instance of stent fracture.\n Conclusion Overdilation of 10-mm Viatorr stents with 12 mm balloons may provide benefit by potentially reducing PSG further for patients initially having inadequate PSG reduction with short-term safety.","PeriodicalId":507357,"journal":{"name":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Efficacy of Overdilation of 10 mm Viatorr Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stents Using 12 mm Balloons\",\"authors\":\"M. M. Tahir, Trevor K. Lewis, Aamir Ali, M. Hsu, Jeffrey L. Weinstein, Muneeb Ahmed, Ammar Sarwar\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1782662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate overdilation of 10-mm standard and 8–10 mm controlled-expansion Viatorr stents to 12 mm during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement when insufficient reduction (<50%) in portosystemic gradient (PSG) is achieved with standard 10 mm dilation.\\n Materials and Methods It is a single-institution, institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of TIPS (2013–2022) to identify patients in the overdilation group (12 mm dilation of a 10-mm stent) and a control group (10 mm dilation of a 10-mm stent) matched for age, indication, stent type, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, pre-TIPS PSG, and variceal embolization. Stent diameter, technical success, clinical outcomes, and adverse events were assessed for both groups.\\n Results TIPS was created for the overdilation group (n = 35, 57 ± 11 years, 69% male; MELD: 14 ± 5) and control group (n = 35, 57 ± 11 years, 83% male; MELD: 14 ± 5). Overdilation to 12 mm adequately reduced PSG by more than 50% (55 vs. 65% in the control group, p = 0.11). The stent diameter was larger in the overdilation group on cross-sectional imaging (9.8 ± 0.2 vs. 9.5 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001), with an estimated 57% higher volume flow rate (p = 0.002). Patients were followed for a median of 11.3 months (range: 0.03–75) and 15.6 months (range: 0.03–106) in the overdilation and control groups, respectively. There was an equivalent rate of ascites resolution (56 vs. 63%, p = 0.68) and rebleeding (13 vs. 17%, p = 0.82) in the overdilation and control groups, with a similar risk of new-onset hepatic encephalopathy (41 vs. 33%, p = 0.51) and TIPS occlusion (11 vs. 9%, p = 0.69). Overdilation did not result in any instance of stent fracture.\\n Conclusion Overdilation of 10-mm Viatorr stents with 12 mm balloons may provide benefit by potentially reducing PSG further for patients initially having inadequate PSG reduction with short-term safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1782662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估在经颈静脉肝内门体系统分流术(TIPS)置管过程中,当标准的 10 毫米扩张不能充分降低门体系统阶差(PSG)(<50%)时,将 10 毫米标准支架和 8-10 毫米可控扩张 Viatorr 支架过度扩张至 12 毫米的情况。材料和方法 这是一项经机构审查委员会批准的单一机构 TIPS 回顾性研究(2013-2022 年),旨在确定过度扩张组(10 毫米支架扩张 12 毫米)和对照组(10 毫米支架扩张 10 毫米)的患者,两组患者的年龄、适应症、支架类型、终末期肝病模型 (MELD) 评分、TIPS 前 PSG 和静脉曲张栓塞情况均匹配。对两组患者的支架直径、技术成功率、临床结果和不良事件进行了评估。结果 为过度扩张组(35 人,57 ± 11 岁,69% 为男性;MELD:14 ± 5)和对照组(35 人,57 ± 11 岁,83% 为男性;MELD:14 ± 5)创建了 TIPS。过度扩张至 12 毫米可使 PSG 降低 50%以上(对照组为 55%,P = 0.11)。在横断面成像上,过度扩张组的支架直径更大(9.8 ± 0.2 mm 对 9.5 ± 0.4 mm,p < 0.001),容积流速估计高出 57% (p = 0.002)。过度扩张组和对照组患者的中位随访时间分别为 11.3 个月(范围:0.03-75)和 15.6 个月(范围:0.03-106)。过度扩张组和对照组的腹水消退率(56% 对 63%,P = 0.68)和再出血率(13% 对 17%,P = 0.82)相当,新发肝性脑病(41% 对 33%,P = 0.51)和 TIPS 闭塞(11% 对 9%,P = 0.69)的风险相似。过度扩张未导致支架断裂。结论 使用 12 毫米球囊过度扩张 10 毫米 Viatorr 支架可进一步减少 PSG,从而为最初 PSG 降低不足的患者带来益处,并具有短期安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety and Efficacy of Overdilation of 10 mm Viatorr Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Stents Using 12 mm Balloons
Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate overdilation of 10-mm standard and 8–10 mm controlled-expansion Viatorr stents to 12 mm during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement when insufficient reduction (<50%) in portosystemic gradient (PSG) is achieved with standard 10 mm dilation. Materials and Methods It is a single-institution, institutional review board-approved, retrospective review of TIPS (2013–2022) to identify patients in the overdilation group (12 mm dilation of a 10-mm stent) and a control group (10 mm dilation of a 10-mm stent) matched for age, indication, stent type, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, pre-TIPS PSG, and variceal embolization. Stent diameter, technical success, clinical outcomes, and adverse events were assessed for both groups. Results TIPS was created for the overdilation group (n = 35, 57 ± 11 years, 69% male; MELD: 14 ± 5) and control group (n = 35, 57 ± 11 years, 83% male; MELD: 14 ± 5). Overdilation to 12 mm adequately reduced PSG by more than 50% (55 vs. 65% in the control group, p = 0.11). The stent diameter was larger in the overdilation group on cross-sectional imaging (9.8 ± 0.2 vs. 9.5 ± 0.4 mm, p < 0.001), with an estimated 57% higher volume flow rate (p = 0.002). Patients were followed for a median of 11.3 months (range: 0.03–75) and 15.6 months (range: 0.03–106) in the overdilation and control groups, respectively. There was an equivalent rate of ascites resolution (56 vs. 63%, p = 0.68) and rebleeding (13 vs. 17%, p = 0.82) in the overdilation and control groups, with a similar risk of new-onset hepatic encephalopathy (41 vs. 33%, p = 0.51) and TIPS occlusion (11 vs. 9%, p = 0.69). Overdilation did not result in any instance of stent fracture. Conclusion Overdilation of 10-mm Viatorr stents with 12 mm balloons may provide benefit by potentially reducing PSG further for patients initially having inadequate PSG reduction with short-term safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Endovascular Treatment of Mycotic Aortic and Iliac Aneurysms in a Tertiary Center: A 15-Year Experience Simplifying Stem Cell Therapy for IRs: Exploring New Horizons in Interventional Radiology and Cell Therapy Antithrombotic Therapy for Inferior Vena Cava Stenting of Malignant Inferior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Questionnaire Study of Japan Interventional Radiology Study Group (JIVROSG) Trans-splenic Approach for Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) Creation in Patients with Portal Vein Thrombosis Outcome of Secondary Interval Rheolytic Thrombectomy after Localized Intra-Arterial Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis through Power-Pulse Spray Technique in Cases of Partially Successful or Failed Primary Rheolytic Thrombectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1