值得信赖的人工智能在医疗保健领域的前景尚未实现:为什么我们在临床转化方面失败了?

Valerie K. Bürger, Julia Amann, Cathrine K. T. Bui, Jana Fehr, V. Madai
{"title":"值得信赖的人工智能在医疗保健领域的前景尚未实现:为什么我们在临床转化方面失败了?","authors":"Valerie K. Bürger, Julia Amann, Cathrine K. T. Bui, Jana Fehr, V. Madai","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1279629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, for example via decision support systems, computer vision approaches, or AI-based prevention tools. Initial results from AI applications in healthcare show promise but are rarely translated into clinical practice successfully and ethically. This occurs despite an abundance of “Trustworthy AI” guidelines. How can we explain the translational gaps of AI in healthcare? This paper offers a fresh perspective on this problem, showing that failing translation of healthcare AI markedly arises from a lack of an operational definition of “trust” and “trustworthiness”. This leads to (a) unintentional misuse concerning what trust (worthiness) is and (b) the risk of intentional abuse by industry stakeholders engaging in ethics washing. By pointing out these issues, we aim to highlight the obstacles that hinder translation of Trustworthy medical AI to practice and prevent it from fulfilling its unmet promises.","PeriodicalId":504480,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Digital Health","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The unmet promise of trustworthy AI in healthcare: why we fail at clinical translation\",\"authors\":\"Valerie K. Bürger, Julia Amann, Cathrine K. T. Bui, Jana Fehr, V. Madai\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1279629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, for example via decision support systems, computer vision approaches, or AI-based prevention tools. Initial results from AI applications in healthcare show promise but are rarely translated into clinical practice successfully and ethically. This occurs despite an abundance of “Trustworthy AI” guidelines. How can we explain the translational gaps of AI in healthcare? This paper offers a fresh perspective on this problem, showing that failing translation of healthcare AI markedly arises from a lack of an operational definition of “trust” and “trustworthiness”. This leads to (a) unintentional misuse concerning what trust (worthiness) is and (b) the risk of intentional abuse by industry stakeholders engaging in ethics washing. By pointing out these issues, we aim to highlight the obstacles that hinder translation of Trustworthy medical AI to practice and prevent it from fulfilling its unmet promises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Digital Health\",\"volume\":\" 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1279629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1279629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能(AI)具有彻底改变医疗保健的潜力,例如通过决策支持系统、计算机视觉方法或基于人工智能的预防工具。人工智能在医疗保健领域应用的初步成果显示出前景,但很少能成功且符合道德规范地转化为临床实践。尽管制定了大量 "值得信赖的人工智能 "指南,但这种情况依然存在。我们如何解释人工智能在医疗保健领域的转化差距?本文对这一问题提供了一个全新的视角,表明医疗人工智能转化失败的主要原因是缺乏对 "信任 "和 "可信性 "的可操作定义。这将导致:(a)关于什么是信任(值得信赖)的无意误用;(b)行业利益相关者在进行伦理清洗时有意滥用的风险。通过指出这些问题,我们旨在强调阻碍将 "值得信赖的医疗人工智能 "转化为实践的障碍,并阻止其实现尚未实现的承诺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The unmet promise of trustworthy AI in healthcare: why we fail at clinical translation
Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to revolutionize healthcare, for example via decision support systems, computer vision approaches, or AI-based prevention tools. Initial results from AI applications in healthcare show promise but are rarely translated into clinical practice successfully and ethically. This occurs despite an abundance of “Trustworthy AI” guidelines. How can we explain the translational gaps of AI in healthcare? This paper offers a fresh perspective on this problem, showing that failing translation of healthcare AI markedly arises from a lack of an operational definition of “trust” and “trustworthiness”. This leads to (a) unintentional misuse concerning what trust (worthiness) is and (b) the risk of intentional abuse by industry stakeholders engaging in ethics washing. By pointing out these issues, we aim to highlight the obstacles that hinder translation of Trustworthy medical AI to practice and prevent it from fulfilling its unmet promises.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the design and development of a handheld electrocardiogram device in a clinical setting Analyzing the barriers and enablers to internet hospital implementation: a qualitative study of a tertiary hospital using TDF and COM-B framework Smartwatch step counting: impact on daily step-count estimation accuracy A review on over-sampling techniques in classification of multi-class imbalanced datasets: insights for medical problems The need for a refined classification system and national incident reporting system for health information technology-related incidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1