吉马士-柔佛巴鲁电气化双轨项目架空导线系统的最佳跨度

Nazrul Aidil Mat Akher, Mimi Faisyalini Ramli, Muhamad Faiz Abd Latif, Reventheran Ganasan, Mohd Asran Shamsuddin, Zuraidah Ngadiron, Nadia Amena Iskandar
{"title":"吉马士-柔佛巴鲁电气化双轨项目架空导线系统的最佳跨度","authors":"Nazrul Aidil Mat Akher, Mimi Faisyalini Ramli, Muhamad Faiz Abd Latif, Reventheran Ganasan, Mohd Asran Shamsuddin, Zuraidah Ngadiron, Nadia Amena Iskandar","doi":"10.37934/araset.43.2.148166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The span term in the Overhead Catenary System (OCS) refers to the distance between two subsequent supports in the running track direction. Longer spans are preferable for economic reasons because they reduce the number of supporting structures. The maximum span along the track was suggested by OCS designers using a structure spacing table and chart with varying wind speeds and radius of curvature. The structure spacing chart is a logarithmic curve that is plotted based on the specifications of the project and design constraints. According to the current design, the maximum span length for the Gemas-Johor Bahru Electrified Double Track Project is 72 metres (GJBEDTP). The current OCS design can be upgraded to provide a greater maximum span. This study looked at the economic benefits of increasing the maximum span length of the GJBEDTP in terms of reducing the total number of supporting structures. The track is separated into many equal-length track sections, and their individual spans are selected using the wind study assessment report and the structure spacing chart. Divide the total track length by the average span to get the estimated total number of supporting structures. In this study, a graph showing the percentage of cost savings and the maximum allowable span is plotted. In this optimization issue, the Elbow approach is used to select a point where diminishing returns are no longer worth the extra expense of going for a longer span. According to the results, the maximum span of 72 m is the ideal span for the GJBEDTP.","PeriodicalId":506443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Optimal Span Length of the Overhead Catenary System for the Gemas-Johor Bahru Electrified Double Track Project\",\"authors\":\"Nazrul Aidil Mat Akher, Mimi Faisyalini Ramli, Muhamad Faiz Abd Latif, Reventheran Ganasan, Mohd Asran Shamsuddin, Zuraidah Ngadiron, Nadia Amena Iskandar\",\"doi\":\"10.37934/araset.43.2.148166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The span term in the Overhead Catenary System (OCS) refers to the distance between two subsequent supports in the running track direction. Longer spans are preferable for economic reasons because they reduce the number of supporting structures. The maximum span along the track was suggested by OCS designers using a structure spacing table and chart with varying wind speeds and radius of curvature. The structure spacing chart is a logarithmic curve that is plotted based on the specifications of the project and design constraints. According to the current design, the maximum span length for the Gemas-Johor Bahru Electrified Double Track Project is 72 metres (GJBEDTP). The current OCS design can be upgraded to provide a greater maximum span. This study looked at the economic benefits of increasing the maximum span length of the GJBEDTP in terms of reducing the total number of supporting structures. The track is separated into many equal-length track sections, and their individual spans are selected using the wind study assessment report and the structure spacing chart. Divide the total track length by the average span to get the estimated total number of supporting structures. In this study, a graph showing the percentage of cost savings and the maximum allowable span is plotted. In this optimization issue, the Elbow approach is used to select a point where diminishing returns are no longer worth the extra expense of going for a longer span. According to the results, the maximum span of 72 m is the ideal span for the GJBEDTP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology\",\"volume\":\" 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.43.2.148166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.43.2.148166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

架空导线架系统(OCS)中的跨度是指在轨道运行方向上两个后续支撑之间的距离。从经济角度考虑,跨度越大越好,因为这样可以减少支撑结构的数量。架空导轨系统的设计人员利用结构间距表和图表,根据不同的风速和曲率半径,提出了轨道上的最大跨度。结构间距图是一条对数曲线,是根据项目规格和设计限制绘制的。根据目前的设计,吉马士-柔佛巴鲁电气化双轨项目的最大跨度为 72 米(GJBEDTP)。目前的 OCS 设计可以升级,以提供更大的最大跨度。本研究探讨了增加 GJBEDTP 最大跨度长度在减少支撑结构总数方面的经济效益。轨道被分成许多等长的轨道区段,并根据风力研究评估报告和结构间距图来选择它们各自的跨度。用轨道总长度除以平均跨度,就能估算出支撑结构的总数量。在这项研究中,绘制了一张图表,显示了成本节约百分比和最大允许跨度。在这一优化问题中,采用了 "弯头法 "来选择一个点,在这个点上,收益递减,不再值得为更长的跨度支付额外费用。根据结果,72 米的最大跨度是 GJBEDTP 的理想跨度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Optimal Span Length of the Overhead Catenary System for the Gemas-Johor Bahru Electrified Double Track Project
The span term in the Overhead Catenary System (OCS) refers to the distance between two subsequent supports in the running track direction. Longer spans are preferable for economic reasons because they reduce the number of supporting structures. The maximum span along the track was suggested by OCS designers using a structure spacing table and chart with varying wind speeds and radius of curvature. The structure spacing chart is a logarithmic curve that is plotted based on the specifications of the project and design constraints. According to the current design, the maximum span length for the Gemas-Johor Bahru Electrified Double Track Project is 72 metres (GJBEDTP). The current OCS design can be upgraded to provide a greater maximum span. This study looked at the economic benefits of increasing the maximum span length of the GJBEDTP in terms of reducing the total number of supporting structures. The track is separated into many equal-length track sections, and their individual spans are selected using the wind study assessment report and the structure spacing chart. Divide the total track length by the average span to get the estimated total number of supporting structures. In this study, a graph showing the percentage of cost savings and the maximum allowable span is plotted. In this optimization issue, the Elbow approach is used to select a point where diminishing returns are no longer worth the extra expense of going for a longer span. According to the results, the maximum span of 72 m is the ideal span for the GJBEDTP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimising Layout of a Left-Turn Bypass Intersection under Mixed Traffic Flow using Simulation: A Case Study in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia Design and Fabrication of Compact MIMO Array Antenna with Tapered Feed Line for 5G Applications Analysing Flipped Classroom Themes Trends in Computer Science Education (2007–2023) Using CiteSpace The Comparison of Fuzzy Regression Approaches with and without Clustering Method in Predicting Manufacturing Income Unveiling Effective CSCL Constructs for STEM Education in Malaysia and Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1