促进和防止矫形创伤后经济毒性的因素:定性研究。

Nathan N O'Hara, Mark J. Gage, Casey Loudermilk, Carolyn Drogt, N. Klazinga, D. Kringos, Lily R Mundy
{"title":"促进和防止矫形创伤后经济毒性的因素:定性研究。","authors":"Nathan N O'Hara, Mark J. Gage, Casey Loudermilk, Carolyn Drogt, N. Klazinga, D. Kringos, Lily R Mundy","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nFinancial toxicity is highly prevalent in patients after an orthopaedic injury. However, little is known regarding the conditions that promote and protect against this financial distress. Our objective was to understand the factors that cause and protect against financial toxicity after a lower extremity fracture.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 patients 3 months after surgical treatment of a lower extremity fracture. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Data saturation occurred after 15 interviews. The percentage of patients who described the identified themes are reported.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 20 patients (median age, 44 years [IQR, 38 to 58]; 60% male) participated in the study. The most common injury was a distal tibia fracture (n = 8; 40%). Eleven themes that promoted financial distress were identified, the most common being work effects (n = 14; 70%) and emotional health (n = 12; 60%). Over half (n = 11; 55%) of participants described financial toxicity arising from an inability to access social welfare programs. Seven themes that protected against financial distress were also identified, including insurance (n = 17; 85%) and support from friends and family (n = 17; 85%). Over half (n = 13; 65%) of the participants discussed the support they received from their healthcare team, which encompassed expectation setting and connections to financial aid and other services. Employment protection and workplace flexibility were additional protective themes.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis qualitative study of orthopaedic trauma patients found work and emotional health-related factors to be primary drivers of financial toxicity after injury. Insurance and support from friends and family were the most frequently reported protective factors. Many participants described the pivotal role of the healthcare team in establishing recovery expectations and facilitating access to social welfare programs.","PeriodicalId":110802,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors that Promote and Protect Against Financial Toxicity after Orthopaedic Trauma: A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan N O'Hara, Mark J. Gage, Casey Loudermilk, Carolyn Drogt, N. Klazinga, D. Kringos, Lily R Mundy\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nFinancial toxicity is highly prevalent in patients after an orthopaedic injury. However, little is known regarding the conditions that promote and protect against this financial distress. Our objective was to understand the factors that cause and protect against financial toxicity after a lower extremity fracture.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 patients 3 months after surgical treatment of a lower extremity fracture. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Data saturation occurred after 15 interviews. The percentage of patients who described the identified themes are reported.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nA total of 20 patients (median age, 44 years [IQR, 38 to 58]; 60% male) participated in the study. The most common injury was a distal tibia fracture (n = 8; 40%). Eleven themes that promoted financial distress were identified, the most common being work effects (n = 14; 70%) and emotional health (n = 12; 60%). Over half (n = 11; 55%) of participants described financial toxicity arising from an inability to access social welfare programs. Seven themes that protected against financial distress were also identified, including insurance (n = 17; 85%) and support from friends and family (n = 17; 85%). Over half (n = 13; 65%) of the participants discussed the support they received from their healthcare team, which encompassed expectation setting and connections to financial aid and other services. Employment protection and workplace flexibility were additional protective themes.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThis qualitative study of orthopaedic trauma patients found work and emotional health-related factors to be primary drivers of financial toxicity after injury. Insurance and support from friends and family were the most frequently reported protective factors. Many participants described the pivotal role of the healthcare team in establishing recovery expectations and facilitating access to social welfare programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\"112 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 在骨科损伤后的患者中,财务中毒现象非常普遍。然而,人们对促进和防止这种财务困境的条件知之甚少。我们的目的是了解导致和防止下肢骨折后财务毒性的因素。方法我们采用半结构化访谈的方式对 20 名下肢骨折手术治疗 3 个月后的患者进行了定性研究。对访谈进行了录音、逐字转录,并使用主题分析法进行分析,以确定主题和次主题。15 次访谈后,数据达到饱和。结果共有 20 名患者(中位年龄 44 岁 [IQR,38-58];60% 为男性)参与了研究。最常见的损伤是胫骨远端骨折(n = 8;40%)。研究确定了 11 个导致经济困难的主题,其中最常见的是工作影响(14 人;70%)和情绪健康(12 人;60%)。超过一半的参与者(n = 11;55%)描述了因无法获得社会福利计划而产生的经济压力。此外,还确定了 7 个防止经济窘迫的主题,包括保险(n = 17;85%)和来自亲友的支持(n = 17;85%)。半数以上(13 人;65%)的参与者讨论了他们从医疗团队获得的支持,其中包括设定期望值以及与经济援助和其他服务的联系。结论:这项针对骨科创伤患者的定性研究发现,工作和情绪健康相关因素是造成伤后财务困境的主要原因。保险和亲友的支持是最常见的保护因素。许多参与者描述了医疗团队在建立康复期望和促进获得社会福利计划方面的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors that Promote and Protect Against Financial Toxicity after Orthopaedic Trauma: A Qualitative Study.
INTRODUCTION Financial toxicity is highly prevalent in patients after an orthopaedic injury. However, little is known regarding the conditions that promote and protect against this financial distress. Our objective was to understand the factors that cause and protect against financial toxicity after a lower extremity fracture. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 20 patients 3 months after surgical treatment of a lower extremity fracture. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify themes and subthemes. Data saturation occurred after 15 interviews. The percentage of patients who described the identified themes are reported. RESULTS A total of 20 patients (median age, 44 years [IQR, 38 to 58]; 60% male) participated in the study. The most common injury was a distal tibia fracture (n = 8; 40%). Eleven themes that promoted financial distress were identified, the most common being work effects (n = 14; 70%) and emotional health (n = 12; 60%). Over half (n = 11; 55%) of participants described financial toxicity arising from an inability to access social welfare programs. Seven themes that protected against financial distress were also identified, including insurance (n = 17; 85%) and support from friends and family (n = 17; 85%). Over half (n = 13; 65%) of the participants discussed the support they received from their healthcare team, which encompassed expectation setting and connections to financial aid and other services. Employment protection and workplace flexibility were additional protective themes. CONCLUSION This qualitative study of orthopaedic trauma patients found work and emotional health-related factors to be primary drivers of financial toxicity after injury. Insurance and support from friends and family were the most frequently reported protective factors. Many participants described the pivotal role of the healthcare team in establishing recovery expectations and facilitating access to social welfare programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Cemented Implants Placed During Initial TKA on Surgical Time and Expenses in Revision TKA. Cannabis Use Disorder Associated With Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications After Hip or Knee Arthroplasties: A Meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Hydrogen Peroxide May Reduce the Risk for Revision Surgery and Infection in Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty: Two-year Follow-up From a Prospective, Blinded, Controlled Trial. Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Ankle Arthroplasty. Evaluation of Preoperative Variables that Improve the Predictive Accuracy of the Risk Assessment and Prediction Tool in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1