M. Mannino, P. Sollena, A. Di Stefani, Ernesto Rossi, E. D'Argento, Giovanni Schinzari, G. Tortora, Ketty Peris
{"title":"表皮生长因子受体抑制剂和免疫疗法对皮肤毒性患者生活质量的影响。","authors":"M. Mannino, P. Sollena, A. Di Stefani, Ernesto Rossi, E. D'Argento, Giovanni Schinzari, G. Tortora, Ketty Peris","doi":"10.1159/000536332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nnovel oncologic therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are associated with a new spectrum of adverse reactions, with prominent cutaneous toxicities. The impact of cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) on patients' quality of life (QoL) represents an unmet clinical need.\n\n\nOBJECTIVES\n1) to assess whether cutaneous toxicities directed therapies are effective in reducing the QoL burden via the submission of two patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); 2) to investigate whether class of oncologic therapy, type of cAE and toxicity severity differently impact on patients' QoL.\n\n\nMETHODS\na prospective observational study was conducted at the Dermatology department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, from October 2018 to October 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, under therapy with EGFR-Is or ICIs and experiencing a treatment-related cAE were eligible for the study. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to patients at first clinical visit (T0), at 1-month (T1), and at 3-month (T2) dermatological follow-up.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixty cAEs of 51 patients have been recorded. A significant difference in the mean score for both DLQI and EORTC QLQ-C30 was found along the 3-months dermatological follow-up (p <0.0001). A similar QoL improvement was reported for PROMs stratified by class of therapy and toxicity severity (p <0.0001). No difference was reported for patients with pyogenic granuloma-like lesions and psoriasiform eruption as per DLQI. Class of therapy and toxicity severity did not differently impact on patients' QoL at selected timepoints; we reported a higher EORTC QLQ-C30 score at T2 for patients developing psoriasiform eruption compared to other types of cAEs.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEarly patients' referral to dermatologists and tailored management could result in better QoL.","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of life impact in patients with cutaneous toxicities caused by EGFR inhibitors and immunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"M. Mannino, P. Sollena, A. Di Stefani, Ernesto Rossi, E. D'Argento, Giovanni Schinzari, G. Tortora, Ketty Peris\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000536332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nnovel oncologic therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are associated with a new spectrum of adverse reactions, with prominent cutaneous toxicities. The impact of cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) on patients' quality of life (QoL) represents an unmet clinical need.\\n\\n\\nOBJECTIVES\\n1) to assess whether cutaneous toxicities directed therapies are effective in reducing the QoL burden via the submission of two patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); 2) to investigate whether class of oncologic therapy, type of cAE and toxicity severity differently impact on patients' QoL.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\na prospective observational study was conducted at the Dermatology department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, from October 2018 to October 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, under therapy with EGFR-Is or ICIs and experiencing a treatment-related cAE were eligible for the study. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to patients at first clinical visit (T0), at 1-month (T1), and at 3-month (T2) dermatological follow-up.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSixty cAEs of 51 patients have been recorded. A significant difference in the mean score for both DLQI and EORTC QLQ-C30 was found along the 3-months dermatological follow-up (p <0.0001). A similar QoL improvement was reported for PROMs stratified by class of therapy and toxicity severity (p <0.0001). No difference was reported for patients with pyogenic granuloma-like lesions and psoriasiform eruption as per DLQI. Class of therapy and toxicity severity did not differently impact on patients' QoL at selected timepoints; we reported a higher EORTC QLQ-C30 score at T2 for patients developing psoriasiform eruption compared to other types of cAEs.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nEarly patients' referral to dermatologists and tailored management could result in better QoL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536332\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000536332","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景新型肿瘤疗法,包括表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFR-Is)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),与一系列新的不良反应相关,其中突出的是皮肤毒性。目的1)通过提交两种患者报告结果测量指标(PROMs),评估针对皮肤毒性的疗法是否能有效减轻患者的 QoL 负担;2)研究肿瘤疗法类别、cAE 类型和毒性严重程度是否会对患者的 QoL 产生不同影响。方法一项前瞻性观察研究于2018年10月至2019年10月在意大利罗马Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS皮肤科进行。年龄≥18岁、正在接受表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFR-Is)或ICIs治疗并出现治疗相关cAE的患者均符合研究条件。在首次临床就诊(T0)、1个月(T1)和3个月(T2)皮肤病随访时,对患者进行皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷-核心30版3.0(EORTC QLQ-C30)测试。在 3 个月的皮肤病随访中,发现 DLQI 和 EORTC QLQ-C30 的平均得分有明显差异(P <0.0001)。按治疗类别和毒性严重程度分层的 PROMs 也有类似的 QoL 改善(p <0.0001)。根据 DLQI,化脓性肉芽肿样皮损和银屑病样糜烂患者的 QoL 无差异。在选定的时间点,治疗类别和毒性严重程度对患者的 QoL 没有不同的影响;与其他类型的 cAEs 相比,我们发现银屑病样糜烂患者在 T2 阶段的 EORTC QLQ-C30 得分更高。
Quality of life impact in patients with cutaneous toxicities caused by EGFR inhibitors and immunotherapy.
BACKGROUND
novel oncologic therapies, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-Is) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are associated with a new spectrum of adverse reactions, with prominent cutaneous toxicities. The impact of cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) on patients' quality of life (QoL) represents an unmet clinical need.
OBJECTIVES
1) to assess whether cutaneous toxicities directed therapies are effective in reducing the QoL burden via the submission of two patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); 2) to investigate whether class of oncologic therapy, type of cAE and toxicity severity differently impact on patients' QoL.
METHODS
a prospective observational study was conducted at the Dermatology department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, from October 2018 to October 2019. Patients aged ≥ 18 years, under therapy with EGFR-Is or ICIs and experiencing a treatment-related cAE were eligible for the study. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 version 3.0 (EORTC QLQ-C30) were administered to patients at first clinical visit (T0), at 1-month (T1), and at 3-month (T2) dermatological follow-up.
RESULTS
Sixty cAEs of 51 patients have been recorded. A significant difference in the mean score for both DLQI and EORTC QLQ-C30 was found along the 3-months dermatological follow-up (p <0.0001). A similar QoL improvement was reported for PROMs stratified by class of therapy and toxicity severity (p <0.0001). No difference was reported for patients with pyogenic granuloma-like lesions and psoriasiform eruption as per DLQI. Class of therapy and toxicity severity did not differently impact on patients' QoL at selected timepoints; we reported a higher EORTC QLQ-C30 score at T2 for patients developing psoriasiform eruption compared to other types of cAEs.
CONCLUSIONS
Early patients' referral to dermatologists and tailored management could result in better QoL.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.