颈动脉闭塞或狭窄患者的肢体震颤性短暂性脑缺血发作:系统综述和患者个体数据荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuroepidemiology Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1159/000538977
Eva Joëlle Haasdijk, Yasmin Sadigh, Gizem Yildirim, R. Dammers, V. Volovici
{"title":"颈动脉闭塞或狭窄患者的肢体震颤性短暂性脑缺血发作:系统综述和患者个体数据荟萃分析。","authors":"Eva Joëlle Haasdijk, Yasmin Sadigh, Gizem Yildirim, R. Dammers, V. Volovici","doi":"10.1159/000538977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nLimb-shaking transient ischemic attack (LSTIA) is a rare neurological condition which presents with involuntary jerky movements of the arm or leg, often because of carotid stenosis or occlusion. Due to the rarity of the condition, the epidemiology of LSTIA is poorly understood and the disease is frequently misdiagnosed. There is no standard treatment to date. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiology of LSTIA and its current treatment options.\n\n\nMETHODS\nEmbase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to 30th of December 2023 for articles containing information on the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA. An individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) was performed using data extracted from the included articles. Inclusion criteria were description of both the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA in patients over the age of eighteen with carotid stenosis/occlusion, confirmed by radiographic imaging. Exclusion criteria were studies focusing on pediatrics, no epidemiological data, internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis/occlusion not radiologically confirmed, full-text unavailable, full-text not in English or Dutch, and non-original articles.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf the 8855 articles screened, 55 articles containing 251 patients were included. 50 articles harboring 81 patients were included in the IPD-MA and 7 articles harboring 187 patients were included in the cohort analysis. The results of the IPD-MA showed that LSTIA was caused by unilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 29 patients (36%) and most often from bilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 52 patients (64%). Limb-shaking was unilateral in 66 patients (83%) and was accompanied by weakness in 27 patients (33%). The intervention with the highest success rate was endovascular intervention (carotid stenting or balloon angioplasty), as all 10 patients remained asymptomatic after treatment. The cohort analysis showed that LSTIA can be caused by both unilateral and bilateral carotid stenosis or occlusion. The prevalence within cohorts of TIA patients of LSTIA varied considerably from 3.5% to 29%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nA large international clinical registry is warranted to gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of LSTIA. There is insufficient evidence available to suggest a standard treatment.","PeriodicalId":54730,"journal":{"name":"Neuroepidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks in patients with carotid occlusion or stenosis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eva Joëlle Haasdijk, Yasmin Sadigh, Gizem Yildirim, R. Dammers, V. Volovici\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nLimb-shaking transient ischemic attack (LSTIA) is a rare neurological condition which presents with involuntary jerky movements of the arm or leg, often because of carotid stenosis or occlusion. Due to the rarity of the condition, the epidemiology of LSTIA is poorly understood and the disease is frequently misdiagnosed. There is no standard treatment to date. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiology of LSTIA and its current treatment options.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nEmbase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to 30th of December 2023 for articles containing information on the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA. An individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) was performed using data extracted from the included articles. Inclusion criteria were description of both the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA in patients over the age of eighteen with carotid stenosis/occlusion, confirmed by radiographic imaging. Exclusion criteria were studies focusing on pediatrics, no epidemiological data, internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis/occlusion not radiologically confirmed, full-text unavailable, full-text not in English or Dutch, and non-original articles.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf the 8855 articles screened, 55 articles containing 251 patients were included. 50 articles harboring 81 patients were included in the IPD-MA and 7 articles harboring 187 patients were included in the cohort analysis. The results of the IPD-MA showed that LSTIA was caused by unilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 29 patients (36%) and most often from bilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 52 patients (64%). Limb-shaking was unilateral in 66 patients (83%) and was accompanied by weakness in 27 patients (33%). The intervention with the highest success rate was endovascular intervention (carotid stenting or balloon angioplasty), as all 10 patients remained asymptomatic after treatment. The cohort analysis showed that LSTIA can be caused by both unilateral and bilateral carotid stenosis or occlusion. The prevalence within cohorts of TIA patients of LSTIA varied considerably from 3.5% to 29%.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nA large international clinical registry is warranted to gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of LSTIA. There is insufficient evidence available to suggest a standard treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroepidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroepidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538977\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroepidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538977","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肢体抖动性短暂性脑缺血发作(LSTIA)是一种罕见的神经系统疾病,表现为手臂或腿部不自主的抽搐运动,通常是由于颈动脉狭窄或闭塞所致。由于这种疾病非常罕见,因此人们对 LSTIA 的流行病学知之甚少,而且这种疾病经常被误诊。目前还没有标准的治疗方法。本研究的目的是概述 LSTIA 的流行病学及其当前的治疗方案。方法从数据库建立之初到 2023 年 12 月 30 日,我们对数据库中包含 LSTIA 流行病学和治疗信息的文章进行了检索:SEmbase、MEDLINE、Web of Science、随机对照试验的 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 和 Google Scholar。利用从纳入文章中提取的数据进行了单个患者数据荟萃分析(IPD-MA)。纳入标准是对 18 岁以上颈动脉狭窄/闭塞患者的 LSTIA 的流行病学和治疗方法进行描述,并经放射成像确认。排除标准包括:侧重于儿科的研究、无流行病学数据、颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄/闭塞未经放射学证实、无法获得全文、全文不是英语或荷兰语以及非原创文章。IPD-MA纳入了50篇文章,共收录81名患者;队列分析纳入了7篇文章,共收录187名患者。IPD-MA 的结果显示,29 名患者(36%)的 LSTIA 是由单侧 ICA 狭窄/闭塞引起的,52 名患者(64%)的 LSTIA 多是由双侧 ICA 狭窄/闭塞引起的。66 名患者(83%)出现单侧肢体抖动,27 名患者(33%)伴有肢体无力。成功率最高的干预措施是血管内干预(颈动脉支架或球囊血管成形术),因为所有10名患者在治疗后仍无症状。队列分析表明,单侧和双侧颈动脉狭窄或闭塞均可导致 LSTIA。TIA患者队列中LSTIA的发病率差异很大,从3.5%到29%不等。目前还没有足够的证据来建议一种标准的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limb-shaking transient ischemic attacks in patients with carotid occlusion or stenosis: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Limb-shaking transient ischemic attack (LSTIA) is a rare neurological condition which presents with involuntary jerky movements of the arm or leg, often because of carotid stenosis or occlusion. Due to the rarity of the condition, the epidemiology of LSTIA is poorly understood and the disease is frequently misdiagnosed. There is no standard treatment to date. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the epidemiology of LSTIA and its current treatment options. METHODS Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials and Google Scholar were searched from database inception to 30th of December 2023 for articles containing information on the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA. An individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) was performed using data extracted from the included articles. Inclusion criteria were description of both the epidemiology and treatment of LSTIA in patients over the age of eighteen with carotid stenosis/occlusion, confirmed by radiographic imaging. Exclusion criteria were studies focusing on pediatrics, no epidemiological data, internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis/occlusion not radiologically confirmed, full-text unavailable, full-text not in English or Dutch, and non-original articles. RESULTS Of the 8855 articles screened, 55 articles containing 251 patients were included. 50 articles harboring 81 patients were included in the IPD-MA and 7 articles harboring 187 patients were included in the cohort analysis. The results of the IPD-MA showed that LSTIA was caused by unilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 29 patients (36%) and most often from bilateral ICA stenosis/occlusion in 52 patients (64%). Limb-shaking was unilateral in 66 patients (83%) and was accompanied by weakness in 27 patients (33%). The intervention with the highest success rate was endovascular intervention (carotid stenting or balloon angioplasty), as all 10 patients remained asymptomatic after treatment. The cohort analysis showed that LSTIA can be caused by both unilateral and bilateral carotid stenosis or occlusion. The prevalence within cohorts of TIA patients of LSTIA varied considerably from 3.5% to 29%. CONCLUSION A large international clinical registry is warranted to gain a better understanding of the epidemiology of LSTIA. There is insufficient evidence available to suggest a standard treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroepidemiology
Neuroepidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neuroepidemiology'' is the only internationally recognised peer-reviewed periodical devoted to descriptive, analytical and experimental studies in the epidemiology of neurologic disease. The scope of the journal expands the boundaries of traditional clinical neurology by providing new insights regarding the etiology, determinants, distribution, management and prevention of diseases of the nervous system.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence, incidence, and mortality of Myasthenia Gravis and myasthenic syndromes: a systematic review. Strength of Association between Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Neurological Disorders in Children: A Case-Control Study. Low sun exposure is associated with both progressive-onset and relapse-onset multiple sclerosis risk: a case-control study. Changing Epidemiology of Neurological Diseases in Africa. Insights from ARCOS-V's Transition to Remote Data Collection During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Descriptive Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1