预防伊拉克杜霍克地区新生儿溶血病的现行抗 D 免疫球蛋白剂量的有效性

IF 0.1 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Iraqi Journal of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.4103/ijh.ijh_8_24
Hazheen Hisham Saifullah, Adil Abozaid Eissa
{"title":"预防伊拉克杜霍克地区新生儿溶血病的现行抗 D 免疫球蛋白剂量的有效性","authors":"Hazheen Hisham Saifullah, Adil Abozaid Eissa","doi":"10.4103/ijh.ijh_8_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The current study was initiated to evaluate the comparability of fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) measurement using flow cytometry (FCM) and Kleihauer–Betke test (KBT) and also to evaluate the validity of the current anti-D immunoglobulin doses for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn in Duhok/Iraq.\n \n \n \n The current study included 101 pregnant women with Rh(D)-negative blood group who had Rh (D)-positive husbands. Their blood was tested for blood groping, FMH by FCM and KBT, and indirect Coombs test, 1 h following sensitizing events and 72 h after giving anti-D. Furthermore, blood from newborns was examined for blood group and direct Coombs test.\n \n \n \n The main sensitizing event was parturition (62.4%) followed by cesarean section (32.7%). The indirect Coombs was positive in 32 cases while the direct Coombs test was positive in 19 cases. In 63.4% of cases, the ABO blood groups were incompatible between mothers and their babies. When FMH was checked by KBT method, it was found that 16 (15.8%) participants had FMH ranging 1.2–51 mL (median 4.35 mL), while FMH was positive in 27 (26.7%) participants by FCM method ranging 1.2–54.4 ml (median 9.5 mL). About 4–5 patients had FMH (measured by KBT and FCM, respectively) of >12 mL and only 1% had a volume of >30 mL. The difference between KBT and FCM for FMH measurement was statistically significant with P < 0.001 when assessed by paired t-test and has a highly significant positive correlation with each other. The correlation of FMH was statistically significant with maternal gravidity, number of anti-D received before (moderate positive correlation), gestational age, and newborn hemoglobin (negative correlation). However, the correlation was not significant between FMH and the following factors: maternal parity, maternal hematological parameters, and ABO compatibility of mother and their babies with P > 0.05.\n \n \n \n Inadequate doses of anti-D had been given previously that resulted in sensitization in at least one-quarter of the cases, and this necessitated proper measurement of FMH in all Rh (D) mothers following sensitizing events.\n","PeriodicalId":53847,"journal":{"name":"Iraqi Journal of Hematology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of the current anti-D immunoglobulin doses for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn in Duhok/Iraq\",\"authors\":\"Hazheen Hisham Saifullah, Adil Abozaid Eissa\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijh.ijh_8_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n The current study was initiated to evaluate the comparability of fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) measurement using flow cytometry (FCM) and Kleihauer–Betke test (KBT) and also to evaluate the validity of the current anti-D immunoglobulin doses for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn in Duhok/Iraq.\\n \\n \\n \\n The current study included 101 pregnant women with Rh(D)-negative blood group who had Rh (D)-positive husbands. Their blood was tested for blood groping, FMH by FCM and KBT, and indirect Coombs test, 1 h following sensitizing events and 72 h after giving anti-D. Furthermore, blood from newborns was examined for blood group and direct Coombs test.\\n \\n \\n \\n The main sensitizing event was parturition (62.4%) followed by cesarean section (32.7%). The indirect Coombs was positive in 32 cases while the direct Coombs test was positive in 19 cases. In 63.4% of cases, the ABO blood groups were incompatible between mothers and their babies. When FMH was checked by KBT method, it was found that 16 (15.8%) participants had FMH ranging 1.2–51 mL (median 4.35 mL), while FMH was positive in 27 (26.7%) participants by FCM method ranging 1.2–54.4 ml (median 9.5 mL). About 4–5 patients had FMH (measured by KBT and FCM, respectively) of >12 mL and only 1% had a volume of >30 mL. The difference between KBT and FCM for FMH measurement was statistically significant with P < 0.001 when assessed by paired t-test and has a highly significant positive correlation with each other. The correlation of FMH was statistically significant with maternal gravidity, number of anti-D received before (moderate positive correlation), gestational age, and newborn hemoglobin (negative correlation). However, the correlation was not significant between FMH and the following factors: maternal parity, maternal hematological parameters, and ABO compatibility of mother and their babies with P > 0.05.\\n \\n \\n \\n Inadequate doses of anti-D had been given previously that resulted in sensitization in at least one-quarter of the cases, and this necessitated proper measurement of FMH in all Rh (D) mothers following sensitizing events.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iraqi Journal of Hematology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iraqi Journal of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijh.ijh_8_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraqi Journal of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijh.ijh_8_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估使用流式细胞术(FCM)和克雷豪尔-贝特克试验(KBT)测量胎儿-产妇出血(FMH)的可比性,同时评估目前用于预防伊拉克杜霍克新生儿溶血病的抗 D 免疫球蛋白剂量的有效性。 本次研究包括 101 名 Rh(D)阴性血型的孕妇,她们的丈夫均为 Rh(D)阳性。在致敏事件发生后 1 小时和给予抗-D 后 72 小时,对她们的血液进行了摸血、FMH(通过 FCM 和 KBT)和间接库姆斯试验检测。此外,还对新生儿的血液进行了血型检测和直接库姆斯试验。 主要致敏事件是分娩(62.4%),其次是剖腹产(32.7%)。32 例间接库姆斯试验呈阳性,19 例直接库姆斯试验呈阳性。63.4%的母婴 ABO 血型不合。用 KBT 法检测 FMH 时发现,16 名参与者(15.8%)的 FMH 为 1.2-51 mL(中位数为 4.35 mL),而用 FCM 法检测 FMH 为 1.2-54.4 mL(中位数为 9.5 mL)的参与者有 27 名(26.7%)。约有 4-5 名患者的 FMH(分别用 KBT 和 FCM 测量)大于 12 毫升,只有 1%的患者大于 30 毫升。经配对 t 检验,KBT 和 FCM 测量的 FMH 差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.001),且两者之间具有高度显著的正相关性。FMH 与孕产妇的妊娠率、之前接受抗 D 的次数(中度正相关)、胎龄和新生儿血红蛋白(负相关)的相关性有统计学意义。然而,FMH 与以下因素的相关性并不显著(P > 0.05):母孕期、母体血液学参数、母婴的 ABO 相容性。 由于之前给予的抗 D 剂量不足,导致至少四分之一的病例发生致敏,因此有必要在发生致敏事件后对所有 Rh (D) 母亲的 FMH 进行适当测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity of the current anti-D immunoglobulin doses for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn in Duhok/Iraq
The current study was initiated to evaluate the comparability of fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) measurement using flow cytometry (FCM) and Kleihauer–Betke test (KBT) and also to evaluate the validity of the current anti-D immunoglobulin doses for the prevention of hemolytic disease of the newborn in Duhok/Iraq. The current study included 101 pregnant women with Rh(D)-negative blood group who had Rh (D)-positive husbands. Their blood was tested for blood groping, FMH by FCM and KBT, and indirect Coombs test, 1 h following sensitizing events and 72 h after giving anti-D. Furthermore, blood from newborns was examined for blood group and direct Coombs test. The main sensitizing event was parturition (62.4%) followed by cesarean section (32.7%). The indirect Coombs was positive in 32 cases while the direct Coombs test was positive in 19 cases. In 63.4% of cases, the ABO blood groups were incompatible between mothers and their babies. When FMH was checked by KBT method, it was found that 16 (15.8%) participants had FMH ranging 1.2–51 mL (median 4.35 mL), while FMH was positive in 27 (26.7%) participants by FCM method ranging 1.2–54.4 ml (median 9.5 mL). About 4–5 patients had FMH (measured by KBT and FCM, respectively) of >12 mL and only 1% had a volume of >30 mL. The difference between KBT and FCM for FMH measurement was statistically significant with P < 0.001 when assessed by paired t-test and has a highly significant positive correlation with each other. The correlation of FMH was statistically significant with maternal gravidity, number of anti-D received before (moderate positive correlation), gestational age, and newborn hemoglobin (negative correlation). However, the correlation was not significant between FMH and the following factors: maternal parity, maternal hematological parameters, and ABO compatibility of mother and their babies with P > 0.05. Inadequate doses of anti-D had been given previously that resulted in sensitization in at least one-quarter of the cases, and this necessitated proper measurement of FMH in all Rh (D) mothers following sensitizing events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pathogenicity role of human herpesvirus-8 in patients with acute myeloid leukemia Serum level of human transforming growth factors β3 in Iraqi patient with chronic myeloid leukemia A comparative study to assess diagnostic efficacy of micro typing gel technique versus conventional tube technique in blood cross-match in blood bank at a tertiary care hospital Provisional diagnosis of clinically significant hemoglobinopathies and decision on suitability for marriage as part of the premarital screening program in Iraq: Iraqi Society of Hematology Guidelines Pattern of bacterial infections in neutropenic febrile patients (experience of the Specialized BMT center - Medical city complex - Baghdad, Iraq)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1