金砖五国在可持续发展方面的效率:数据包络比较分析

Isabella Melissa Gebert, Felipa de Mello-Sampayo
{"title":"金砖五国在可持续发展方面的效率:数据包络比较分析","authors":"Isabella Melissa Gebert, Felipa de Mello-Sampayo","doi":"10.1108/ijdi-12-2023-0287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aims to assess the efficiency of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) countries in achieving sustainable development by analyzing their ability to convert resources and technological innovations into sustainable outcomes.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing data envelopment analysis (DEA), the study evaluates the economic, environmental and social efficiency of BRICS countries over the period 2010–2018. It ranks these countries based on their sustainable development performance and compares them to the period 2000–2007.\n\nFindings\nThe study reveals varied efficiency levels among BRICS countries. Russia and South Africa lead in certain sustainable development aspects. South Africa excels in environmental sustainability, whereas Brazil is efficient in resource utilization for sustainable growth. China and India, despite economic growth, face challenges such as pollution and lower quality of life.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study’s findings are constrained by the DEA methodology and the selection of variables. It highlights the need for more nuanced research incorporating recent global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical shifts.\n\nPractical implications\nInsights from this study can inform targeted and effective sustainability strategies in BRICS nations, focusing on areas such as industrial quality improvement, employment conditions and environmental policies.\n\nSocial implications\nThe study underscores the importance of balancing economic growth with social and environmental considerations, highlighting the need for policies addressing inequality, poverty and environmental degradation.\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research provides a unique comparative analysis of BRICS countries’ sustainable development efficiency, challenging conventional perceptions and offering a new perspective on their progress.\n","PeriodicalId":37830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Development Issues","volume":"23 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of BRICS countries in sustainable development: a comparative data envelopment analysis\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Melissa Gebert, Felipa de Mello-Sampayo\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijdi-12-2023-0287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nThis study aims to assess the efficiency of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) countries in achieving sustainable development by analyzing their ability to convert resources and technological innovations into sustainable outcomes.\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing data envelopment analysis (DEA), the study evaluates the economic, environmental and social efficiency of BRICS countries over the period 2010–2018. It ranks these countries based on their sustainable development performance and compares them to the period 2000–2007.\\n\\nFindings\\nThe study reveals varied efficiency levels among BRICS countries. Russia and South Africa lead in certain sustainable development aspects. South Africa excels in environmental sustainability, whereas Brazil is efficient in resource utilization for sustainable growth. China and India, despite economic growth, face challenges such as pollution and lower quality of life.\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study’s findings are constrained by the DEA methodology and the selection of variables. It highlights the need for more nuanced research incorporating recent global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical shifts.\\n\\nPractical implications\\nInsights from this study can inform targeted and effective sustainability strategies in BRICS nations, focusing on areas such as industrial quality improvement, employment conditions and environmental policies.\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe study underscores the importance of balancing economic growth with social and environmental considerations, highlighting the need for policies addressing inequality, poverty and environmental degradation.\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis research provides a unique comparative analysis of BRICS countries’ sustainable development efficiency, challenging conventional perceptions and offering a new perspective on their progress.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":37830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Development Issues\",\"volume\":\"23 24\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Development Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-12-2023-0287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Development Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-12-2023-0287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过分析巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国、南非(金砖五国)将资源和技术创新转化为可持续成果的能力,评估这些国家在实现可持续发展方面的效率。研究结果表明,金砖国家的效率水平参差不齐。俄罗斯和南非在某些可持续发展方面处于领先地位。南非在环境可持续性方面表现出色,而巴西在资源利用促进可持续增长方面效率较高。尽管中国和印度实现了经济增长,但也面临着污染和生活质量下降等挑战。研究局限性/意义研究结果受到 DEA 方法和变量选择的限制。实际意义本研究的观点可为金砖国家有针对性的、有效的可持续发展战略提供参考,重点关注工业质量改善、就业条件和环境政策等领域。社会意义本研究强调了平衡经济增长与社会和环境因素的重要性,突出了解决不平等、贫困和环境退化问题的政策的必要性。原创性/价值本研究对金砖国家的可持续发展效率进行了独特的比较分析,对传统观念提出了挑战,并为金砖国家的进步提供了新的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of BRICS countries in sustainable development: a comparative data envelopment analysis
Purpose This study aims to assess the efficiency of Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa (BRICS) countries in achieving sustainable development by analyzing their ability to convert resources and technological innovations into sustainable outcomes. Design/methodology/approach Using data envelopment analysis (DEA), the study evaluates the economic, environmental and social efficiency of BRICS countries over the period 2010–2018. It ranks these countries based on their sustainable development performance and compares them to the period 2000–2007. Findings The study reveals varied efficiency levels among BRICS countries. Russia and South Africa lead in certain sustainable development aspects. South Africa excels in environmental sustainability, whereas Brazil is efficient in resource utilization for sustainable growth. China and India, despite economic growth, face challenges such as pollution and lower quality of life. Research limitations/implications The study’s findings are constrained by the DEA methodology and the selection of variables. It highlights the need for more nuanced research incorporating recent global events such as the COVID-19 pandemic and geopolitical shifts. Practical implications Insights from this study can inform targeted and effective sustainability strategies in BRICS nations, focusing on areas such as industrial quality improvement, employment conditions and environmental policies. Social implications The study underscores the importance of balancing economic growth with social and environmental considerations, highlighting the need for policies addressing inequality, poverty and environmental degradation. Originality/value This research provides a unique comparative analysis of BRICS countries’ sustainable development efficiency, challenging conventional perceptions and offering a new perspective on their progress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Development Issues
International Journal of Development Issues Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Development Issues (IJDI) publishes scholarly research on important development issues, with a particular focus on development dynamism and a leaning towards inter-disciplinary research. IJDI welcomes papers that are empirically oriented but such work should have solid methodological foundations based on realism and pragmatism rather than on idealism. Critical analysis of development issues from both the heteredox viewpoint and the neo-liberalist viewpoint, in orthodox tradition, are equally encouraged. The journal publishes authoritative, intelligent articles and research of direct relevance to those investigating and/or working within areas closely associated with development processes. Special consideration is given to research papers that consider development issues from either a socio-economic, political, historical or sociological, anthropological, ecological and technological standpoint.
期刊最新文献
Accurate targeting in social assistance programs in Southern Madagascar Impact of government expenditure on unemployment in Asian countries: does institutional quality matter? Estimating vulnerability to income and multidimensional poverty: a new methodological approach Natural resource rent's effect on Ethiopian inequality and manufacturing's moderating role: evidence from dynamic simulated ARDL model Trade, gender equality and institutional quality: Evidence from the gravitational approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1