可用性测试:基于 WoS 数据的文献计量分析

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Journal of Scientometric Research Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.5530/jscires.13.1.2
M.S. Baghini, Mehdi Mohammadi, Narges Norouzkhani
{"title":"可用性测试:基于 WoS 数据的文献计量分析","authors":"M.S. Baghini, Mehdi Mohammadi, Narges Norouzkhani","doi":"10.5530/jscires.13.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability is a qualitative characteristic that evaluates the ease of use of user interfaces. This study aims to conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis of usability testing and to understand the research context and trends in this field. A total of 5273 scientific publications from the Web of Science core collection were included in the study. Performance analysis, scientific mapping, and visualization were done using the RStudio package and the VOSviewer software tool. The results show that the interest in the area of usability testing has significantly increased, especially from 1991 to 2022. The United States has the highest number of publications, citations, co-citations, and ratios. Toronto University was top in terms of institutional contributions. The JMIR mHealth and uHealth led in the number of publications and citations. Khajouei has the highest number of publications, but Jaspers has received the most citations on usability testing. With 10264 total link strength, Nielsen has the most potent co-citation papers. This study reveals the latest research trends and hotspots and the current state of international collaboration in usability testing research, to indicate the most influential research channels. These findings include; the prominent countries, institutions, journals, original articles, and authors. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to conduct the bibliometric analysis on usability testing. These findings can be useful in shaping the direction of future studies on usability testing","PeriodicalId":43282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scientometric Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Testing: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on WoS Data\",\"authors\":\"M.S. Baghini, Mehdi Mohammadi, Narges Norouzkhani\",\"doi\":\"10.5530/jscires.13.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usability is a qualitative characteristic that evaluates the ease of use of user interfaces. This study aims to conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis of usability testing and to understand the research context and trends in this field. A total of 5273 scientific publications from the Web of Science core collection were included in the study. Performance analysis, scientific mapping, and visualization were done using the RStudio package and the VOSviewer software tool. The results show that the interest in the area of usability testing has significantly increased, especially from 1991 to 2022. The United States has the highest number of publications, citations, co-citations, and ratios. Toronto University was top in terms of institutional contributions. The JMIR mHealth and uHealth led in the number of publications and citations. Khajouei has the highest number of publications, but Jaspers has received the most citations on usability testing. With 10264 total link strength, Nielsen has the most potent co-citation papers. This study reveals the latest research trends and hotspots and the current state of international collaboration in usability testing research, to indicate the most influential research channels. These findings include; the prominent countries, institutions, journals, original articles, and authors. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to conduct the bibliometric analysis on usability testing. These findings can be useful in shaping the direction of future studies on usability testing\",\"PeriodicalId\":43282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Scientometric Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Scientometric Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.13.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scientometric Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.13.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可用性是评价用户界面易用性的一个定性特征。本研究旨在对可用性测试进行系统的文献计量分析,了解该领域的研究背景和趋势。本研究共收录了科学网核心数据库中的 5273 篇科学出版物。使用 RStudio 软件包和 VOSviewer 软件工具进行了性能分析、科学绘图和可视化。结果表明,人们对可用性测试领域的兴趣明显增加,尤其是从1991年到2022年。美国的出版物数量、引用次数、联合引用次数和比率都是最高的。多伦多大学在机构贡献方面名列前茅。JMIR mHealth 和 uHealth 在发表论文数量和引用次数方面均居首位。Khajouei发表的论文数量最多,但Jaspers在可用性测试方面获得的引用次数最多。尼尔森拥有10264篇总链接强度最高的联合引用论文。本研究揭示了可用性测试研究的最新研究趋势和热点,以及国际合作的现状,指出了最有影响力的研究渠道。这些发现包括:著名的国家、机构、期刊、原创文章和作者。据作者所知,这项研究是首次对可用性测试进行文献计量分析。这些研究结果有助于确定未来可用性测试研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Usability Testing: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on WoS Data
Usability is a qualitative characteristic that evaluates the ease of use of user interfaces. This study aims to conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis of usability testing and to understand the research context and trends in this field. A total of 5273 scientific publications from the Web of Science core collection were included in the study. Performance analysis, scientific mapping, and visualization were done using the RStudio package and the VOSviewer software tool. The results show that the interest in the area of usability testing has significantly increased, especially from 1991 to 2022. The United States has the highest number of publications, citations, co-citations, and ratios. Toronto University was top in terms of institutional contributions. The JMIR mHealth and uHealth led in the number of publications and citations. Khajouei has the highest number of publications, but Jaspers has received the most citations on usability testing. With 10264 total link strength, Nielsen has the most potent co-citation papers. This study reveals the latest research trends and hotspots and the current state of international collaboration in usability testing research, to indicate the most influential research channels. These findings include; the prominent countries, institutions, journals, original articles, and authors. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to conduct the bibliometric analysis on usability testing. These findings can be useful in shaping the direction of future studies on usability testing
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Scientometric Research
Journal of Scientometric Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Landscape of Autonomous Vehicles Research: A Scientometric Analysis in the Context of Urban Transportation Planning Usability Testing: A Bibliometric Analysis Based on WoS Data Keyphrase-Based Literature Recommendation: Enhancing User Queries with Hybrid Co-citation and Co-occurrence Networks The Development of Research on Investor Sentiment in Emerging and Frontier Markets with the Bibliometric Method Analysis of Emerging Research Areas in Selected African Countries: A Case of Biotechnology-Applied Microbiology Discipline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1