基于性别的烟草烟雾不良影响比较:元分析

Samuel Worku
{"title":"基于性别的烟草烟雾不良影响比较:元分析","authors":"Samuel Worku","doi":"10.18231/j.ijirm.2024.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies have suggested varying degrees of vulnerability to the detrimental effects of tobacco smoking between females and males. However, conflicting findings on sex-specific differences in the negative impact of tobacco smoking have emerged. This study conducts a comprehensive review of the available evidence to assess the adverse effects of smoking with respect to gender. From an initial pool of 99 primary studies conducted before 2010, 26 studies were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Among these, 15 were cohort studies, 4 were cross-sectional studies, 4 were case-control studies, and 2 were systematic reviews. Fixed-effect models and meta-regression were employed to derive pooled risk ratios (RR), and P-value functions were utilized to assess the consistency of the results. The pooled risk ratio for men who were current smokers, concerning all-cause mortality, was 0.954 (95% CI 0.866-1.05). For women who were current smokers, the pooled risk ratio for cardiovascular disorders was 1.2 (95% CI 1.18-1.22). Notably, female current smokers exhibited a significantly more rapid annual decline in FEV% predicted with increasing age compared to their male counterparts (as indicated by linear regression analysis: R2 = 0.56; p = 0.008). However, the relative risk for bone-related disorders was found to be higher in male current smokers than in their female counterparts. The findings of this study underscore that both males and females face an elevated risk of experiencing the adverse effects of smoking. Nonetheless, the magnitude of these effects differs based on gender. Further research is warranted to validate the outcomes of this study.","PeriodicalId":14503,"journal":{"name":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","volume":"20 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tobacco smoke adverse effects comparison based on gender: Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Worku\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijirm.2024.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several studies have suggested varying degrees of vulnerability to the detrimental effects of tobacco smoking between females and males. However, conflicting findings on sex-specific differences in the negative impact of tobacco smoking have emerged. This study conducts a comprehensive review of the available evidence to assess the adverse effects of smoking with respect to gender. From an initial pool of 99 primary studies conducted before 2010, 26 studies were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Among these, 15 were cohort studies, 4 were cross-sectional studies, 4 were case-control studies, and 2 were systematic reviews. Fixed-effect models and meta-regression were employed to derive pooled risk ratios (RR), and P-value functions were utilized to assess the consistency of the results. The pooled risk ratio for men who were current smokers, concerning all-cause mortality, was 0.954 (95% CI 0.866-1.05). For women who were current smokers, the pooled risk ratio for cardiovascular disorders was 1.2 (95% CI 1.18-1.22). Notably, female current smokers exhibited a significantly more rapid annual decline in FEV% predicted with increasing age compared to their male counterparts (as indicated by linear regression analysis: R2 = 0.56; p = 0.008). However, the relative risk for bone-related disorders was found to be higher in male current smokers than in their female counterparts. The findings of this study underscore that both males and females face an elevated risk of experiencing the adverse effects of smoking. Nonetheless, the magnitude of these effects differs based on gender. Further research is warranted to validate the outcomes of this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijirm.2024.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP Indian Journal of Immunology and Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijirm.2024.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些研究表明,女性和男性在不同程度上容易受到吸烟的有害影响。然而,关于吸烟负面影响的性别差异却出现了相互矛盾的研究结果。本研究对现有证据进行了全面回顾,以评估吸烟对不同性别的不良影响。从 2010 年前进行的 99 项主要研究中,初步筛选出 26 项研究纳入本次荟萃分析。其中,15 项为队列研究,4 项为横断面研究,4 项为病例对照研究,2 项为系统综述。采用固定效应模型和元回归方法得出集合风险比(RR),并利用 P 值函数评估结果的一致性。当前吸烟男性全因死亡率的集合风险比为0.954(95% CI 0.866-1.05)。对于女性吸烟者来说,心血管疾病的集合风险比为 1.2(95% CI 1.18-1.22)。值得注意的是,与男性吸烟者相比,女性吸烟者的 FEV% 预测值随着年龄的增长每年下降的速度明显更快(线性回归分析显示:R2 = 0.56;P = 0.008)。然而,研究发现,男性吸烟者患骨骼相关疾病的相对风险高于女性吸烟者。这项研究的结果表明,男性和女性遭受吸烟不良影响的风险都很高。然而,这些影响的程度因性别而异。为了验证这项研究的结果,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tobacco smoke adverse effects comparison based on gender: Meta-analysis
Several studies have suggested varying degrees of vulnerability to the detrimental effects of tobacco smoking between females and males. However, conflicting findings on sex-specific differences in the negative impact of tobacco smoking have emerged. This study conducts a comprehensive review of the available evidence to assess the adverse effects of smoking with respect to gender. From an initial pool of 99 primary studies conducted before 2010, 26 studies were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Among these, 15 were cohort studies, 4 were cross-sectional studies, 4 were case-control studies, and 2 were systematic reviews. Fixed-effect models and meta-regression were employed to derive pooled risk ratios (RR), and P-value functions were utilized to assess the consistency of the results. The pooled risk ratio for men who were current smokers, concerning all-cause mortality, was 0.954 (95% CI 0.866-1.05). For women who were current smokers, the pooled risk ratio for cardiovascular disorders was 1.2 (95% CI 1.18-1.22). Notably, female current smokers exhibited a significantly more rapid annual decline in FEV% predicted with increasing age compared to their male counterparts (as indicated by linear regression analysis: R2 = 0.56; p = 0.008). However, the relative risk for bone-related disorders was found to be higher in male current smokers than in their female counterparts. The findings of this study underscore that both males and females face an elevated risk of experiencing the adverse effects of smoking. Nonetheless, the magnitude of these effects differs based on gender. Further research is warranted to validate the outcomes of this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in tuberculosis diagnosis: Revolutionizing detection and treatment A closer look -Asymptomatic cysticercosis unveiled during COPD exacerbation: A case report Think beyond TB lymphadenitis - Kikuchi fujimoto lymphadenitis Psychological manifestations in patients with tuberculosis: prevalence and contributing factors Evaluation of impact of adherence to inhaled therapy and critical mistakes in inhalation technique on clinical outcomes in patients with obstructive airway diseases in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1