地中海雨养椎体土壤上小麦和法豆对间作和耕作制度的响应

IF 1.4 Q3 AGRONOMY Agricultural Research Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1007/s40003-024-00718-6
Rafael J. Lopez-Bellido, Veronica Muñoz-Romero, Purificacion Fernandez-Garcia, Luis Lopez-Bellido
{"title":"地中海雨养椎体土壤上小麦和法豆对间作和耕作制度的响应","authors":"Rafael J. Lopez-Bellido,&nbsp;Veronica Muñoz-Romero,&nbsp;Purificacion Fernandez-Garcia,&nbsp;Luis Lopez-Bellido","doi":"10.1007/s40003-024-00718-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sustainability of agricultural systems can be improved by practices such as intercropping or no tillage. Such practices have not been evaluated for wheat–faba bean cropping systems on a Vertisol in the rainfed Mediterranean region. A 3-yr study (2014–2015, 2015–2016 and 2016–2017) was conducted to determine the effects of tillage systems (reduced tillage and no tillage) on wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.)–faba bean (<i>Vicia faba</i> L.) intercrop and sole crop performance under a dryland rotation system with sunflower (<i>Helianthus annuus</i> L.) rotation. Wheat was intercropped with faba bean arranged 2:1 row. The field experiment was designed in a split plot randomized block with tillage system in main plot and cropping system in sub-plot with four replications. The land equivalent ratio of the grain yield was greater than 1, indicating a more efficient use of land by intercropping. No tillage improved the grain yield compared to reduced tillage by 65, 10 and 32% in the cultivation of wheat, faba beans and sunflower, respectively. The grain yield obtained with the intercropping system was higher than that with the sole cropping system only in the faba bean crop. The cropping system was not influenced by the tillage systems. The soil–plant analyses development (SPAD) values were lower for the intercropped wheat, suggesting a lower bioavailability of N in this cropping system. However, intercropping could be highly beneficial compared to planting wheat alone since higher grain yields are achieved even without the application of N fertilizer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7553,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Research","volume":"13 3","pages":"553 - 562"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of Wheat and Faba Bean to Intercropping and Tillage System on a Mediterranean Rainfed Vertisol\",\"authors\":\"Rafael J. Lopez-Bellido,&nbsp;Veronica Muñoz-Romero,&nbsp;Purificacion Fernandez-Garcia,&nbsp;Luis Lopez-Bellido\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40003-024-00718-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The sustainability of agricultural systems can be improved by practices such as intercropping or no tillage. Such practices have not been evaluated for wheat–faba bean cropping systems on a Vertisol in the rainfed Mediterranean region. A 3-yr study (2014–2015, 2015–2016 and 2016–2017) was conducted to determine the effects of tillage systems (reduced tillage and no tillage) on wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.)–faba bean (<i>Vicia faba</i> L.) intercrop and sole crop performance under a dryland rotation system with sunflower (<i>Helianthus annuus</i> L.) rotation. Wheat was intercropped with faba bean arranged 2:1 row. The field experiment was designed in a split plot randomized block with tillage system in main plot and cropping system in sub-plot with four replications. The land equivalent ratio of the grain yield was greater than 1, indicating a more efficient use of land by intercropping. No tillage improved the grain yield compared to reduced tillage by 65, 10 and 32% in the cultivation of wheat, faba beans and sunflower, respectively. The grain yield obtained with the intercropping system was higher than that with the sole cropping system only in the faba bean crop. The cropping system was not influenced by the tillage systems. The soil–plant analyses development (SPAD) values were lower for the intercropped wheat, suggesting a lower bioavailability of N in this cropping system. However, intercropping could be highly beneficial compared to planting wheat alone since higher grain yields are achieved even without the application of N fertilizer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Research\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"553 - 562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40003-024-00718-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40003-024-00718-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间作或免耕等做法可以提高农业系统的可持续性。在雨水灌溉的地中海地区的瘠薄土壤上,尚未对小麦-法豆种植系统的此类做法进行过评估。我们开展了一项为期三年(2014-2015 年、2015-2016 年和 2016-2017 年)的研究,以确定在向日葵(Helianthus annuus L.)轮作的旱地轮作系统下,耕作制度(减少耕作和免耕)对小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)-蚕豆(Vicia faba L.)间作和单作的影响。小麦与蚕豆间作,行距为 2:1。田间试验采用分小区随机区组设计,主小区采用耕作制度,子小区采用种植制度,共设四个重复。谷物产量的土地当量比大于 1,表明间作套种能更有效地利用土地。在种植小麦、蚕豆和向日葵时,免耕比少耕的谷物产量分别提高了 65%、10% 和 32%。仅在蚕豆作物上,间作系统的谷物产量高于单作系统。种植制度不受耕作制度的影响。间作小麦的土壤-植物分析发育(SPAD)值较低,表明该种植系统中氮的生物利用率较低。不过,与单独种植小麦相比,间作套种的好处很多,因为即使不施用氮肥,小麦也能获得较高的产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response of Wheat and Faba Bean to Intercropping and Tillage System on a Mediterranean Rainfed Vertisol

The sustainability of agricultural systems can be improved by practices such as intercropping or no tillage. Such practices have not been evaluated for wheat–faba bean cropping systems on a Vertisol in the rainfed Mediterranean region. A 3-yr study (2014–2015, 2015–2016 and 2016–2017) was conducted to determine the effects of tillage systems (reduced tillage and no tillage) on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–faba bean (Vicia faba L.) intercrop and sole crop performance under a dryland rotation system with sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) rotation. Wheat was intercropped with faba bean arranged 2:1 row. The field experiment was designed in a split plot randomized block with tillage system in main plot and cropping system in sub-plot with four replications. The land equivalent ratio of the grain yield was greater than 1, indicating a more efficient use of land by intercropping. No tillage improved the grain yield compared to reduced tillage by 65, 10 and 32% in the cultivation of wheat, faba beans and sunflower, respectively. The grain yield obtained with the intercropping system was higher than that with the sole cropping system only in the faba bean crop. The cropping system was not influenced by the tillage systems. The soil–plant analyses development (SPAD) values were lower for the intercropped wheat, suggesting a lower bioavailability of N in this cropping system. However, intercropping could be highly beneficial compared to planting wheat alone since higher grain yields are achieved even without the application of N fertilizer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The main objective of this initiative is to promote agricultural research and development. The journal will publish high quality original research papers and critical reviews on emerging fields and concepts for providing future directions. The publications will include both applied and basic research covering the following disciplines of agricultural sciences: Genetic resources, genetics and breeding, biotechnology, physiology, biochemistry, management of biotic and abiotic stresses, and nutrition of field crops, horticultural crops, livestock and fishes; agricultural meteorology, environmental sciences, forestry and agro forestry, agronomy, soils and soil management, microbiology, water management, agricultural engineering and technology, agricultural policy, agricultural economics, food nutrition, agricultural statistics, and extension research; impact of climate change and the emerging technologies on agriculture, and the role of agricultural research and innovation for development.
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Tomorrow: A Comprehensive Review of Agricultural Innovations in the Philippines (2018–2023) Exploring Oxyfluorfen's Environmental Fate: Soil Affinity, Persistence, Degradation Dynamics and Ecological Implications Examining the Prevalence and Predictors of Stunting in Indian Children: A Spatial and Multilevel Analysis Approach Buzzing for Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica): Exploring Insect Pollinators, Their Behaviour, Single-Visit Efficiency and the Significance of Honey Bees in Yield Enhancement An Investigation on the Present Status of Wetlands in Majuli River Island; The World Largest River Island and Its Fishery Resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1