{"title":"牛牙本质与采用不同粘接技术的粘接剂形成的界面中的边缘渗漏","authors":"Ana Natália Oliveira, R. A. Caldas, R. Consani","doi":"10.24018/ejdent.2024.5.2.323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal microleakage in interfaces formed by bovine dentin and adhesive cements applied with different bonding techniques.\nMaterials and Methods: Thirty bovine teeth dentin blocks measuring 5 mm x 5 mm x 1 mm were made with one side completely in dentin substract (20 mm2). The dentin blocks were randomly divided into three groups according to the cementation technique used: CTS+RX (conventional 3-step adhesive + dual-activation resin cement), SBS+RX (single-bottle self-etching adhesive + dual-activation resin cement), and SAC (self-adhesive cement). A photopolymerizable composite resin block with the same dimensions was fixed on the dentin block according to the instructions for each adhesive technique. The dentin-composite resin blocks made with each adhesive technique were separated into subgroups (n = 5) for 7 days (control) and for 6 months of water storage. After each period, the blocks were individually immersed in test tubes containing neutral methylene blue dye for 2 hours. The samples were washed, dried, and evaluated with a stereoscopic magnifying glass, and the amount of infiltrated pigment was analyzed using spectrophotometry (Beckman DU 65). The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%).\nResults: Microleakage level for the conventional 3-step or self-etching technique remained similar for 7 days (18 ± 25 and 43 ± 45 μm, respectively) or 6 months (42 ± 55 and 52 ± 87 μm, respectively). The self-adhesive technique showed higher microleakage levels for 7-day (263 ± 98 μm) and 6-month periods (441 ± 226 μm) compared to other adhesive techniques. There was a statistically significant difference between evaluation times only for the self-adhesive technique.\nConclusions: Higher microleakage levels by storage in water occurred with the self-adhesive technique in both evaluation periods.\nClinical Relevance: The different microleakage levels promoted at the dentin-composite resin interface should be considered in adhesive clinical procedures in relation to long-term use.","PeriodicalId":502291,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","volume":"2 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal Leakage in Interfaces Formed by Bovine Dentin and Adhesive Cements Applied with Different Bonding Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Ana Natália Oliveira, R. A. Caldas, R. Consani\",\"doi\":\"10.24018/ejdent.2024.5.2.323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal microleakage in interfaces formed by bovine dentin and adhesive cements applied with different bonding techniques.\\nMaterials and Methods: Thirty bovine teeth dentin blocks measuring 5 mm x 5 mm x 1 mm were made with one side completely in dentin substract (20 mm2). The dentin blocks were randomly divided into three groups according to the cementation technique used: CTS+RX (conventional 3-step adhesive + dual-activation resin cement), SBS+RX (single-bottle self-etching adhesive + dual-activation resin cement), and SAC (self-adhesive cement). A photopolymerizable composite resin block with the same dimensions was fixed on the dentin block according to the instructions for each adhesive technique. The dentin-composite resin blocks made with each adhesive technique were separated into subgroups (n = 5) for 7 days (control) and for 6 months of water storage. After each period, the blocks were individually immersed in test tubes containing neutral methylene blue dye for 2 hours. The samples were washed, dried, and evaluated with a stereoscopic magnifying glass, and the amount of infiltrated pigment was analyzed using spectrophotometry (Beckman DU 65). The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%).\\nResults: Microleakage level for the conventional 3-step or self-etching technique remained similar for 7 days (18 ± 25 and 43 ± 45 μm, respectively) or 6 months (42 ± 55 and 52 ± 87 μm, respectively). The self-adhesive technique showed higher microleakage levels for 7-day (263 ± 98 μm) and 6-month periods (441 ± 226 μm) compared to other adhesive techniques. There was a statistically significant difference between evaluation times only for the self-adhesive technique.\\nConclusions: Higher microleakage levels by storage in water occurred with the self-adhesive technique in both evaluation periods.\\nClinical Relevance: The different microleakage levels promoted at the dentin-composite resin interface should be considered in adhesive clinical procedures in relation to long-term use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"2 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2024.5.2.323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2024.5.2.323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Marginal Leakage in Interfaces Formed by Bovine Dentin and Adhesive Cements Applied with Different Bonding Techniques
Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal microleakage in interfaces formed by bovine dentin and adhesive cements applied with different bonding techniques.
Materials and Methods: Thirty bovine teeth dentin blocks measuring 5 mm x 5 mm x 1 mm were made with one side completely in dentin substract (20 mm2). The dentin blocks were randomly divided into three groups according to the cementation technique used: CTS+RX (conventional 3-step adhesive + dual-activation resin cement), SBS+RX (single-bottle self-etching adhesive + dual-activation resin cement), and SAC (self-adhesive cement). A photopolymerizable composite resin block with the same dimensions was fixed on the dentin block according to the instructions for each adhesive technique. The dentin-composite resin blocks made with each adhesive technique were separated into subgroups (n = 5) for 7 days (control) and for 6 months of water storage. After each period, the blocks were individually immersed in test tubes containing neutral methylene blue dye for 2 hours. The samples were washed, dried, and evaluated with a stereoscopic magnifying glass, and the amount of infiltrated pigment was analyzed using spectrophotometry (Beckman DU 65). The data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (5%).
Results: Microleakage level for the conventional 3-step or self-etching technique remained similar for 7 days (18 ± 25 and 43 ± 45 μm, respectively) or 6 months (42 ± 55 and 52 ± 87 μm, respectively). The self-adhesive technique showed higher microleakage levels for 7-day (263 ± 98 μm) and 6-month periods (441 ± 226 μm) compared to other adhesive techniques. There was a statistically significant difference between evaluation times only for the self-adhesive technique.
Conclusions: Higher microleakage levels by storage in water occurred with the self-adhesive technique in both evaluation periods.
Clinical Relevance: The different microleakage levels promoted at the dentin-composite resin interface should be considered in adhesive clinical procedures in relation to long-term use.