叙事、实践与现实:对于米特-库尔特的《安特普 1915》一书进行历史性批判,将其视为一部以散居地为导向的叙事作品

Yücel Karadaş
{"title":"叙事、实践与现实:对于米特-库尔特的《安特普 1915》一书进行历史性批判,将其视为一部以散居地为导向的叙事作品","authors":"Yücel Karadaş","doi":"10.52108/2757-5942.5.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article consists of three sections. First of all, the narrative that Armenians, who live in Western countries as a community who suffered from deprivations while migrating, have built out in the diaspora about the causes and processes of the migration has been described. Second, the criticism on the description of this narrative by Mr. Ümit Kurt, in his work Antep 1915 which radically verifies the narrative without interrogating its validity, that attempts to reveal the factual practice likewise has been made. In the end, the fact that the life practices of Armenians in Antep mostly invalidates the arguments built out by the narrative by the memoirs of the Armenians concerning their life experiences in Antep whom Mr. Enç, as a personal witness of the migration process, encountered in the United States in his lifetime has been emphasized. Thereby, Mr. Ümit Kurt has radically adopted the narrative, that a diaspora community has produced to persevere in the diaspora, which sometimes distorts historical factuality disregarding historical documents and oral history narratives and also some more evidence. Therefore, Mr. Ümit Kurt has tried the harmonize the factuality with the narrative. In this article, a critical analysis of Kurt’s book has been made in the light of historical documents. In addition, the information expressed in the book has been compared with the lived experiences of Armenians in both Antep and the United States, which Mitat Enç conveys in two works (Unending Night; Manly Talks).","PeriodicalId":508354,"journal":{"name":"Sosyolojik Bağlam Dergisi","volume":"66 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Narrative, Practice and Reality: Historical Criticism of Ümit Kurt’s Book Antep 1915 as a Diaspora-oriented Narrative\",\"authors\":\"Yücel Karadaş\",\"doi\":\"10.52108/2757-5942.5.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article consists of three sections. First of all, the narrative that Armenians, who live in Western countries as a community who suffered from deprivations while migrating, have built out in the diaspora about the causes and processes of the migration has been described. Second, the criticism on the description of this narrative by Mr. Ümit Kurt, in his work Antep 1915 which radically verifies the narrative without interrogating its validity, that attempts to reveal the factual practice likewise has been made. In the end, the fact that the life practices of Armenians in Antep mostly invalidates the arguments built out by the narrative by the memoirs of the Armenians concerning their life experiences in Antep whom Mr. Enç, as a personal witness of the migration process, encountered in the United States in his lifetime has been emphasized. Thereby, Mr. Ümit Kurt has radically adopted the narrative, that a diaspora community has produced to persevere in the diaspora, which sometimes distorts historical factuality disregarding historical documents and oral history narratives and also some more evidence. Therefore, Mr. Ümit Kurt has tried the harmonize the factuality with the narrative. In this article, a critical analysis of Kurt’s book has been made in the light of historical documents. In addition, the information expressed in the book has been compared with the lived experiences of Armenians in both Antep and the United States, which Mitat Enç conveys in two works (Unending Night; Manly Talks).\",\"PeriodicalId\":508354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sosyolojik Bağlam Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"66 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sosyolojik Bağlam Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52108/2757-5942.5.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sosyolojik Bağlam Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52108/2757-5942.5.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文包括三个部分。首先,描述了散居在西方国家的亚美尼亚人作为一个在迁徙过程中遭受剥夺的群体,对迁徙原因和过程的叙述。其次,Ümit Kurt 先生在其著作《Antep 1915》中对这一叙事的描述提出了批评,他从根本上验证了这一叙事,却没有质疑其有效性,同样试图揭示事实的做法。最后,强调了亚美尼亚人在安特普的生活实践在很大程度上推翻了恩奇先生作为迁徙过程的亲历者在其有生之年在美国遇到的亚美尼亚人关于其在安特普的生活经历的回忆录中提出的论点。因此,于米特-库尔特先生从根本上采纳了散居社区为在散居地生活下去而编写的叙事,这 种叙事有时会歪曲历史事实,无视历史文献和口述历史叙事以及其他一些证据。因此,于米特-库尔特先生试图将事实与叙述协调起来。本文根据历史文献对库尔特的著作进行了批判性分析。此外,还将书中所表达的信息与米塔特-恩奇在两部作品(《无尽之夜》和《曼利会谈》)中传达的安特普和美国的亚美尼亚人的生活经历进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Narrative, Practice and Reality: Historical Criticism of Ümit Kurt’s Book Antep 1915 as a Diaspora-oriented Narrative
This article consists of three sections. First of all, the narrative that Armenians, who live in Western countries as a community who suffered from deprivations while migrating, have built out in the diaspora about the causes and processes of the migration has been described. Second, the criticism on the description of this narrative by Mr. Ümit Kurt, in his work Antep 1915 which radically verifies the narrative without interrogating its validity, that attempts to reveal the factual practice likewise has been made. In the end, the fact that the life practices of Armenians in Antep mostly invalidates the arguments built out by the narrative by the memoirs of the Armenians concerning their life experiences in Antep whom Mr. Enç, as a personal witness of the migration process, encountered in the United States in his lifetime has been emphasized. Thereby, Mr. Ümit Kurt has radically adopted the narrative, that a diaspora community has produced to persevere in the diaspora, which sometimes distorts historical factuality disregarding historical documents and oral history narratives and also some more evidence. Therefore, Mr. Ümit Kurt has tried the harmonize the factuality with the narrative. In this article, a critical analysis of Kurt’s book has been made in the light of historical documents. In addition, the information expressed in the book has been compared with the lived experiences of Armenians in both Antep and the United States, which Mitat Enç conveys in two works (Unending Night; Manly Talks).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Suriyeli Göçmen İşletmelerin Hedef Ülkede Marka Değerini Koruması: Gaziantep Örneği Modernite ve Ontolojik Güvenlik Bağlamında Yoga Kültürü: Yoga Eğitmenleri ve Uygulayıcıları Üzerine Nitel Bir Araştırma Doğal Afetler Karşısında Dini Tutum ve Ritüellerin Rolü Kadınlar Hasta Olur, Erkekler Ölür: Sağlıkta Cinsiyet Temelli Farklılıkların Sosyolojik Analizi Jürgen Habermas’ın İletişimsel Akıl Kavramı Perspektifinde Modernite Eleştirisi ve Demokrasi Arayışları
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1