苏丹北科尔多凡州谷胱甘肽 S 转移酶 M1、T1、P1(GSTM1、GSTT1、GSTP1)基因多态性与镰状细胞性贫血并发症的关系

Mona M. S. Salama, Mahdi H. A. Abdalla, Nasr Eldeen Ali Mohammed Gaufri
{"title":"苏丹北科尔多凡州谷胱甘肽 S 转移酶 M1、T1、P1(GSTM1、GSTT1、GSTP1)基因多态性与镰状细胞性贫血并发症的关系","authors":"Mona M. S. Salama, Mahdi H. A. Abdalla, Nasr Eldeen Ali Mohammed Gaufri","doi":"10.36348/sjm.2024.v09i04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sickle cell anaemia (SCA) is an inherited blood disorder that is characterized by chronic haemolysis and episodes of many clinical complications. The number of people living with sickle cell disease globally increased from 5.46 million in 2000 to 7.74 million in 2021. This study aimed to investigate the association of glutathione S transferase M1, T1, P1 (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) gene polymorphisms with SCA complications. This was a case-control and hospital-based study, conducted in the SCA center, Alkuaiti Hospital, North Kordofan state, Sudan. Following informed consent, one hundred twenty-six participants were recruited to this study, 63 were SCA patients attending Alkuaiti Hospital, and 63 age and gender matched apparently healthy individuals as the control group. The full blood count was done using an automated hematological analyzer, genotyping of the GSTM1 and the GSTT1 polymorphisms were determined using multiplex polymerase chain reaction, while genotyping of the GSTP1 was determined using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Complications data were collected from admission and discharge records. 52.4% (n=33) from the case group were male and 47.6% (n=30) were females. The GSTM1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1Null genotype was 57.1% and the GSTM1 present genotype was 42.9%, the GSTM1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1Null genotype was 52.4% and the GSTM1 present genotype was 47.6%. The GSTT1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTT1 Null genotype was 69.8%, and the GSTT1 present genotype was 30.2%. The GSTT1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTT1 Null genotype was 49.8%, and the GSTT1 present genotype was 50.2%. The GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1 GSTT1 Null genotype was 74.6%, and the GSTM1 GSTT1 present genotype was 25.4%. The GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1 GSTT1 Null genotype was 77.7% and the GSTM1 GSTT1 present genotype was 22.3%. The GSTP1 genotype in the case group showed that the wild-type Ile/Ile was (15.9%), the heterozygous Ile/Val was (66.7%), and the homozygous mutant Val/Val was (17.4%). The GSTP1 genotype in the control group showed that the wild-type Ile/Ile was (3.2%), the heterozygous Ile/Val was (84.1%), and the homozygous mutant Val/Val was (12.7%). There were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, TWBCs, and PLTs between the GSTM1 genotypes (P.value =0.69, 0.47, 0.22) respectively also there were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, TWBCs, and PLTs between the GSTT1 genotypes (P.value = 0.84, 0.45, 0.48) respectively and the GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes (P.value= 0.53, 0.70, 0.46) respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, and TWBCs between the GSTP1 genotypes (P.value= 0.15, 0.36) respectively but there was a statistically significant difference in PLTs between the GSTP1 genotypes (P.value= 0.07). The study concluded that there were no statistically significant differences in the GSTM1 and the GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes between the case group and the control group with (P.value= 0.36, 0.36) respectively and there were statistically significant differences in the GSTT1 and the GSTP1 genotypes between the case group and the control group with (P.value 0.014, 0.02) respectively. The GSTT1 present genotype was significantly associated with acute heart failure (P.value 0.02). The GSTP1 (val val) genotype was significantly associated with painful crisis and hepatomegaly as combined complications (P.value 0.008). The other GSTT1, other GSTP1, and GSTM1 genotypes revealed no significant associations with SCA complications.","PeriodicalId":510088,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine","volume":"40 162","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Glutathione S Transferase M1, T1, P1 (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) Gene Polymorphisms with Sickle Cell Anaemia Complications in North Kordofan State, Sudan\",\"authors\":\"Mona M. S. Salama, Mahdi H. A. Abdalla, Nasr Eldeen Ali Mohammed Gaufri\",\"doi\":\"10.36348/sjm.2024.v09i04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sickle cell anaemia (SCA) is an inherited blood disorder that is characterized by chronic haemolysis and episodes of many clinical complications. The number of people living with sickle cell disease globally increased from 5.46 million in 2000 to 7.74 million in 2021. This study aimed to investigate the association of glutathione S transferase M1, T1, P1 (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) gene polymorphisms with SCA complications. This was a case-control and hospital-based study, conducted in the SCA center, Alkuaiti Hospital, North Kordofan state, Sudan. Following informed consent, one hundred twenty-six participants were recruited to this study, 63 were SCA patients attending Alkuaiti Hospital, and 63 age and gender matched apparently healthy individuals as the control group. The full blood count was done using an automated hematological analyzer, genotyping of the GSTM1 and the GSTT1 polymorphisms were determined using multiplex polymerase chain reaction, while genotyping of the GSTP1 was determined using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Complications data were collected from admission and discharge records. 52.4% (n=33) from the case group were male and 47.6% (n=30) were females. The GSTM1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1Null genotype was 57.1% and the GSTM1 present genotype was 42.9%, the GSTM1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1Null genotype was 52.4% and the GSTM1 present genotype was 47.6%. The GSTT1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTT1 Null genotype was 69.8%, and the GSTT1 present genotype was 30.2%. The GSTT1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTT1 Null genotype was 49.8%, and the GSTT1 present genotype was 50.2%. The GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1 GSTT1 Null genotype was 74.6%, and the GSTM1 GSTT1 present genotype was 25.4%. The GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1 GSTT1 Null genotype was 77.7% and the GSTM1 GSTT1 present genotype was 22.3%. The GSTP1 genotype in the case group showed that the wild-type Ile/Ile was (15.9%), the heterozygous Ile/Val was (66.7%), and the homozygous mutant Val/Val was (17.4%). The GSTP1 genotype in the control group showed that the wild-type Ile/Ile was (3.2%), the heterozygous Ile/Val was (84.1%), and the homozygous mutant Val/Val was (12.7%). There were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, TWBCs, and PLTs between the GSTM1 genotypes (P.value =0.69, 0.47, 0.22) respectively also there were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, TWBCs, and PLTs between the GSTT1 genotypes (P.value = 0.84, 0.45, 0.48) respectively and the GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes (P.value= 0.53, 0.70, 0.46) respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, and TWBCs between the GSTP1 genotypes (P.value= 0.15, 0.36) respectively but there was a statistically significant difference in PLTs between the GSTP1 genotypes (P.value= 0.07). The study concluded that there were no statistically significant differences in the GSTM1 and the GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes between the case group and the control group with (P.value= 0.36, 0.36) respectively and there were statistically significant differences in the GSTT1 and the GSTP1 genotypes between the case group and the control group with (P.value 0.014, 0.02) respectively. The GSTT1 present genotype was significantly associated with acute heart failure (P.value 0.02). The GSTP1 (val val) genotype was significantly associated with painful crisis and hepatomegaly as combined complications (P.value 0.008). The other GSTT1, other GSTP1, and GSTM1 genotypes revealed no significant associations with SCA complications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 162\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjm.2024.v09i04.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjm.2024.v09i04.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

镰状细胞性贫血(SCA)是一种遗传性血液疾病,以慢性溶血和多种临床并发症为特征。全球镰状细胞病患者人数从 2000 年的 546 万增至 2021 年的 774 万。本研究旨在探讨谷胱甘肽 S 转移酶 M1、T1、P1(GSTM1、GSTT1、GSTP1)基因多态性与镰状细胞病并发症的关系。这是一项基于医院的病例对照研究,在苏丹北科尔多凡州 Alkuaiti 医院的 SCA 中心进行。在征得知情同意后,本研究共招募了 126 名参与者,其中 63 名是在阿尔库艾提医院就诊的 SCA 患者,另外 63 名年龄和性别相匹配的表面健康者作为对照组。研究人员使用全自动血液分析仪进行全血细胞计数,使用多重聚合酶链式反应确定 GSTM1 和 GSTT1 多态性的基因分型,使用聚合酶链式反应-限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)方法确定 GSTP1 的基因分型。并发症数据来自入院和出院记录。病例组中男性占 52.4%(样本数=33),女性占 47.6%(样本数=30)。病例组的 GSTM1 基因型显示,GSTM1Null 基因型的频率为 57.1%,GSTM1 存在基因型的频率为 42.9%;对照组的 GSTM1 基因型显示,GSTM1Null 基因型的频率为 52.4%,GSTM1 存在基因型的频率为 47.6%。病例组的 GSTT1 基因型显示,GSTT1 Null 基因型的频率为 69.8%,GSTT1 存在基因型的频率为 30.2%。对照组的 GSTT1 基因型显示,GSTT1 Null 基因型的频率为 49.8%,GSTT1 存在基因型的频率为 50.2%。病例组的 GSTM1 GSTT1 基因型显示,GSTM1 GSTT1 Null 基因型的频率为 74.6%,GSTM1 GSTT1 存在基因型的频率为 25.4%。对照组的 GSTM1 GSTT1 基因型显示,GSTM1 GSTT1 Null 基因型的频率为 77.7%,GSTM1 GSTT1 存在基因型的频率为 22.3%。病例组的 GSTP1 基因型显示,野生型 Ile/Ile 为(15.9%),杂合型 Ile/Val 为(66.7%),同源突变型 Val/Val 为(17.4%)。对照组的 GSTP1 基因型显示,野生型 Ile/Ile 为(3.2%),杂合型 Ile/Val 为(84.1%),同源突变型 Val/Val 为(12.7%)。GSTM1 基因型的 Hb、TWBCs 和 PLTs 与 GSTM1 基因型的 Hb、TWBCs 和 PLTs 没有明显的统计学差异(P.值分别为 0.69、0.47、0.22),GSTT1 基因型的 Hb、TWBCs 和 PLTs 与 GSTM1 基因型的 Hb、TWBCs 和 PLTs 也没有明显的统计学差异(P.值分别为 0.84、0.45、0.48),GSTM1 基因型的 Hb、TWBCs 和 PLTs 与 GSTM1 基因型的 Hb、TWBCs 和 PLTs 也没有明显的统计学差异(P.值分别为 0.53、0.70、0.46)。GSTP1 基因型之间的 Hb 和 TWBC 没有统计学差异(P.value= 0.15,0.36),但 GSTP1 基因型之间的 PLT 有统计学差异(P.value= 0.07)。研究认为,病例组和对照组的 GSTM1 和 GSTM1 GSTT1 基因型差异无统计学意义,分别为(P.value= 0.36,0.36);病例组和对照组的 GSTT1 和 GSTP1 基因型差异有统计学意义,分别为(P.value 0.014,0.02)。GSTT1 现基因型与急性心力衰竭明显相关(P.值为 0.02)。GSTP1(val val)基因型与疼痛危象和肝肿大这两种并发症明显相关(P.值为 0.008)。其他 GSTT1、其他 GSTP1 和 GSTM1 基因型与 SCA 并发症无明显关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Glutathione S Transferase M1, T1, P1 (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) Gene Polymorphisms with Sickle Cell Anaemia Complications in North Kordofan State, Sudan
Sickle cell anaemia (SCA) is an inherited blood disorder that is characterized by chronic haemolysis and episodes of many clinical complications. The number of people living with sickle cell disease globally increased from 5.46 million in 2000 to 7.74 million in 2021. This study aimed to investigate the association of glutathione S transferase M1, T1, P1 (GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1) gene polymorphisms with SCA complications. This was a case-control and hospital-based study, conducted in the SCA center, Alkuaiti Hospital, North Kordofan state, Sudan. Following informed consent, one hundred twenty-six participants were recruited to this study, 63 were SCA patients attending Alkuaiti Hospital, and 63 age and gender matched apparently healthy individuals as the control group. The full blood count was done using an automated hematological analyzer, genotyping of the GSTM1 and the GSTT1 polymorphisms were determined using multiplex polymerase chain reaction, while genotyping of the GSTP1 was determined using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Complications data were collected from admission and discharge records. 52.4% (n=33) from the case group were male and 47.6% (n=30) were females. The GSTM1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1Null genotype was 57.1% and the GSTM1 present genotype was 42.9%, the GSTM1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1Null genotype was 52.4% and the GSTM1 present genotype was 47.6%. The GSTT1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTT1 Null genotype was 69.8%, and the GSTT1 present genotype was 30.2%. The GSTT1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTT1 Null genotype was 49.8%, and the GSTT1 present genotype was 50.2%. The GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes in the case group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1 GSTT1 Null genotype was 74.6%, and the GSTM1 GSTT1 present genotype was 25.4%. The GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes in the control group showed that the frequency of the GSTM1 GSTT1 Null genotype was 77.7% and the GSTM1 GSTT1 present genotype was 22.3%. The GSTP1 genotype in the case group showed that the wild-type Ile/Ile was (15.9%), the heterozygous Ile/Val was (66.7%), and the homozygous mutant Val/Val was (17.4%). The GSTP1 genotype in the control group showed that the wild-type Ile/Ile was (3.2%), the heterozygous Ile/Val was (84.1%), and the homozygous mutant Val/Val was (12.7%). There were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, TWBCs, and PLTs between the GSTM1 genotypes (P.value =0.69, 0.47, 0.22) respectively also there were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, TWBCs, and PLTs between the GSTT1 genotypes (P.value = 0.84, 0.45, 0.48) respectively and the GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes (P.value= 0.53, 0.70, 0.46) respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the Hb, and TWBCs between the GSTP1 genotypes (P.value= 0.15, 0.36) respectively but there was a statistically significant difference in PLTs between the GSTP1 genotypes (P.value= 0.07). The study concluded that there were no statistically significant differences in the GSTM1 and the GSTM1 GSTT1 genotypes between the case group and the control group with (P.value= 0.36, 0.36) respectively and there were statistically significant differences in the GSTT1 and the GSTP1 genotypes between the case group and the control group with (P.value 0.014, 0.02) respectively. The GSTT1 present genotype was significantly associated with acute heart failure (P.value 0.02). The GSTP1 (val val) genotype was significantly associated with painful crisis and hepatomegaly as combined complications (P.value 0.008). The other GSTT1, other GSTP1, and GSTM1 genotypes revealed no significant associations with SCA complications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns and Influencing Factors of Organisms and Sensitivity in Sputum at Sylhet The Prevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Pressure Injury among Adults at King Saud Medical City, Riyadh Erectile Dysfunction in Adults: A Review of Neurological Causes and Risk Factor Analysis Procalcitonin-A Marker of Sepsis An Impactful Health Fair in a Semi-Urban Community: Awolowo Town Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1