湿流和气穴流条件下刚性和柔性水翼周围流动的实验和数值研究

P. Perali, F. Hauville, A. Leroyer, J. Astolfi, Michel Visonneau
{"title":"湿流和气穴流条件下刚性和柔性水翼周围流动的实验和数值研究","authors":"P. Perali, F. Hauville, A. Leroyer, J. Astolfi, Michel Visonneau","doi":"10.1115/1.4065296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The hydroelastic response of a flexible NACA 0015 hydrofoil is investigated for both wetted and cavitating flow conditions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis are performed using a fully implicit coupling between the ISIS-CFD solver (developed by the METHRIC team at Ecole Centrale de Nantes) and a modal approach for the structure. The RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) solver is first validated for wetted and cavitating flow conditions around a similar rigid hydrofoil, with experimental results carried out at the hydrodynamic tunnel of the French Naval Academy, including lift and drag measurements and high speed camera images. Then the numerical predictions for the flexible hydrofoil response are compared with experimental bending shapes and vibrations amplitudes, with a focus on cavitating flow conditions. For wetted flow conditions, numerical results show a good agreement with the experiments, for both rigid and flexible hydrofoils. For cavitating flow conditions, the hydroelastic response is dominated by vibrations at the hydrofoil modal frequencies and the re-entrant jet instability frequency. For the lowest values of the cavitation parameter, a large amplitude peak is experimentally observed in the frequency response spectra, due to lock-in between the first modal frequency and the re-entrant jet frequency. Strong harmonics of this dominant peak also appear in the spectra, revealing a non-linear response of the hydrofoil. While the amplitudes of vibrations are well predicted by the computations, the frequency lock-in observed in the experiments is not captured by the numerical model.","PeriodicalId":504378,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluids Engineering","volume":"14 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental and Numerical Study of the Flow Around Rigid and Flexible Hydrofoils for Wetted and Cavitating Flow Conditions\",\"authors\":\"P. Perali, F. Hauville, A. Leroyer, J. Astolfi, Michel Visonneau\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4065296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The hydroelastic response of a flexible NACA 0015 hydrofoil is investigated for both wetted and cavitating flow conditions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis are performed using a fully implicit coupling between the ISIS-CFD solver (developed by the METHRIC team at Ecole Centrale de Nantes) and a modal approach for the structure. The RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) solver is first validated for wetted and cavitating flow conditions around a similar rigid hydrofoil, with experimental results carried out at the hydrodynamic tunnel of the French Naval Academy, including lift and drag measurements and high speed camera images. Then the numerical predictions for the flexible hydrofoil response are compared with experimental bending shapes and vibrations amplitudes, with a focus on cavitating flow conditions. For wetted flow conditions, numerical results show a good agreement with the experiments, for both rigid and flexible hydrofoils. For cavitating flow conditions, the hydroelastic response is dominated by vibrations at the hydrofoil modal frequencies and the re-entrant jet instability frequency. For the lowest values of the cavitation parameter, a large amplitude peak is experimentally observed in the frequency response spectra, due to lock-in between the first modal frequency and the re-entrant jet frequency. Strong harmonics of this dominant peak also appear in the spectra, revealing a non-linear response of the hydrofoil. While the amplitudes of vibrations are well predicted by the computations, the frequency lock-in observed in the experiments is not captured by the numerical model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluids Engineering\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluids Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065296\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了柔性 NACA 0015 水翼在湿流和气穴流条件下的水弹性响应。计算流体动力学(CFD)分析使用 ISIS-CFD 求解器(由南特中央理工大学 METHRIC 团队开发)与结构模态方法之间的全隐式耦合。RANS(雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯)求解器首先通过法国海军学院水动力隧道的实验结果,包括升力和阻力测量以及高速摄像机图像,对类似刚性水翼周围的湿流和气穴流条件进行了验证。然后,将柔性水翼响应的数值预测与实验弯曲形状和振动振幅进行比较,重点是空化流条件。在湿流条件下,无论是刚性水翼还是柔性水翼,数值结果都与实验结果吻合。对于气蚀流条件,水弹性响应主要是水翼模态频率和再入射流不稳定频率的振动。对于气蚀参数的最低值,由于第一模态频率和再入射流频率之间的锁定,在频率响应频谱中实验观察到一个大振幅峰值。这个主峰的强谐波也出现在频谱中,揭示了水翼的非线性响应。虽然计算结果很好地预测了振动的幅度,但数值模型并没有捕捉到实验中观察到的频率锁定现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental and Numerical Study of the Flow Around Rigid and Flexible Hydrofoils for Wetted and Cavitating Flow Conditions
The hydroelastic response of a flexible NACA 0015 hydrofoil is investigated for both wetted and cavitating flow conditions. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) analysis are performed using a fully implicit coupling between the ISIS-CFD solver (developed by the METHRIC team at Ecole Centrale de Nantes) and a modal approach for the structure. The RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) solver is first validated for wetted and cavitating flow conditions around a similar rigid hydrofoil, with experimental results carried out at the hydrodynamic tunnel of the French Naval Academy, including lift and drag measurements and high speed camera images. Then the numerical predictions for the flexible hydrofoil response are compared with experimental bending shapes and vibrations amplitudes, with a focus on cavitating flow conditions. For wetted flow conditions, numerical results show a good agreement with the experiments, for both rigid and flexible hydrofoils. For cavitating flow conditions, the hydroelastic response is dominated by vibrations at the hydrofoil modal frequencies and the re-entrant jet instability frequency. For the lowest values of the cavitation parameter, a large amplitude peak is experimentally observed in the frequency response spectra, due to lock-in between the first modal frequency and the re-entrant jet frequency. Strong harmonics of this dominant peak also appear in the spectra, revealing a non-linear response of the hydrofoil. While the amplitudes of vibrations are well predicted by the computations, the frequency lock-in observed in the experiments is not captured by the numerical model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of Tire Attributes on the Aerodynamic Performance of a Generic Car-Tire Assembly1 Hydrodynamic Design and Pulsation Evolution in an Axial-Flow Pump Based On Control Mechanism of Flow-Induced Excitation Numerical Investigation of the Impact of the Rectangular Nozzle Aspect Ratio On Liquid Jet in Crossflow Numerical Study On the Effect of Channel Configuration On Mixture Formation of an Axial Flow Wave Rotor Combustor Study of Temperature Drop Region in Transitional Region in Fluid-film Thrust Bearings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1