为受监禁影响的患者提供临床伦理咨询:单中心回顾性研究

Yena Kang, Samantha Chao, Alethia Battles, Janice I. Firn
{"title":"为受监禁影响的患者提供临床伦理咨询:单中心回顾性研究","authors":"Yena Kang, Samantha Chao, Alethia Battles, Janice I. Firn","doi":"10.1089/jchc.23.10.0083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Health care professionals and patients impacted by incarceration face unique medical, legal, and ethical issues. The frequency and nature of ethics consultations for these patients are underexplored. This study aimed to characterize the primary ethical issue and contextual features of ethics consultations involving patients impacted by incarceration. We conducted a qualitative concept content analysis of ethics consultations involving patients impacted by incarceration and calculated descriptive statistics of demographics to compare these patients with the broader population of patients impacted by incarceration at a single institution from January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2022. We identified 37,184 patients impacted by incarceration (people currently or formerly incarcerated or whose surrogate decision-maker is incarcerated) at our institution. Most were White (70%) and non-Hispanic (88%); 51% were male, 49% female. Individuals impacted by incarceration comprised 3% (n = 38) of ethics consults. Most were White (58%), male (79%), and hospitalized (92%). The primary ethical issues were surrogate decision-making (34%) and fiduciary duties (beneficence/nonmaleficence/best interest; 16%). The primary contextual feature was intra-family communication challenges (37%). Incarceration status impacts access to decision-makers and the provision of medically necessary care. Ethics consultation for women and individuals in outpatient and emergency settings could be underutilized. More education about ethics consultation services and coordination with correctional officials is recommended.","PeriodicalId":73693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Ethics Consultation for Patients Impacted by Incarceration: A Single Center Retrospective Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yena Kang, Samantha Chao, Alethia Battles, Janice I. Firn\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jchc.23.10.0083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Health care professionals and patients impacted by incarceration face unique medical, legal, and ethical issues. The frequency and nature of ethics consultations for these patients are underexplored. This study aimed to characterize the primary ethical issue and contextual features of ethics consultations involving patients impacted by incarceration. We conducted a qualitative concept content analysis of ethics consultations involving patients impacted by incarceration and calculated descriptive statistics of demographics to compare these patients with the broader population of patients impacted by incarceration at a single institution from January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2022. We identified 37,184 patients impacted by incarceration (people currently or formerly incarcerated or whose surrogate decision-maker is incarcerated) at our institution. Most were White (70%) and non-Hispanic (88%); 51% were male, 49% female. Individuals impacted by incarceration comprised 3% (n = 38) of ethics consults. Most were White (58%), male (79%), and hospitalized (92%). The primary ethical issues were surrogate decision-making (34%) and fiduciary duties (beneficence/nonmaleficence/best interest; 16%). The primary contextual feature was intra-family communication challenges (37%). Incarceration status impacts access to decision-makers and the provision of medically necessary care. Ethics consultation for women and individuals in outpatient and emergency settings could be underutilized. More education about ethics consultation services and coordination with correctional officials is recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care\",\"volume\":\"1 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.23.10.0083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.23.10.0083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受监禁影响的医护人员和患者面临着独特的医疗、法律和伦理问题。对这些患者进行伦理咨询的频率和性质的研究还很不够。本研究旨在描述受监禁影响的患者所涉及的主要伦理问题和伦理咨询的背景特征。我们对涉及受监禁影响的患者的伦理咨询进行了定性概念内容分析,并计算了人口统计学的描述性统计数字,以便将这些患者与 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日期间单一机构中更广泛的受监禁影响的患者群体进行比较。我们在本机构确定了 37,184 名受监禁影响的患者(目前或曾经被监禁或其代理决策者被监禁的人)。大多数患者为白人(70%)和非西班牙裔(88%);51%为男性,49%为女性。受监禁影响的个人占伦理咨询的 3%(n = 38)。大多数为白人(58%)、男性(79%)和住院患者(92%)。主要的伦理问题是代理决策(34%)和信托责任(受益/非渎职/最佳利益;16%)。主要的背景特征是家庭内部沟通挑战(37%)。监禁状况影响了与决策者的接触以及提供必要的医疗护理。在门诊和急诊环境中为妇女和个人提供的伦理咨询服务可能未得到充分利用。建议开展更多有关伦理咨询服务的教育,并与管教官员进行协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Ethics Consultation for Patients Impacted by Incarceration: A Single Center Retrospective Review.
Health care professionals and patients impacted by incarceration face unique medical, legal, and ethical issues. The frequency and nature of ethics consultations for these patients are underexplored. This study aimed to characterize the primary ethical issue and contextual features of ethics consultations involving patients impacted by incarceration. We conducted a qualitative concept content analysis of ethics consultations involving patients impacted by incarceration and calculated descriptive statistics of demographics to compare these patients with the broader population of patients impacted by incarceration at a single institution from January 1, 2015, through June 30, 2022. We identified 37,184 patients impacted by incarceration (people currently or formerly incarcerated or whose surrogate decision-maker is incarcerated) at our institution. Most were White (70%) and non-Hispanic (88%); 51% were male, 49% female. Individuals impacted by incarceration comprised 3% (n = 38) of ethics consults. Most were White (58%), male (79%), and hospitalized (92%). The primary ethical issues were surrogate decision-making (34%) and fiduciary duties (beneficence/nonmaleficence/best interest; 16%). The primary contextual feature was intra-family communication challenges (37%). Incarceration status impacts access to decision-makers and the provision of medically necessary care. Ethics consultation for women and individuals in outpatient and emergency settings could be underutilized. More education about ethics consultation services and coordination with correctional officials is recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conducting Grief Support Groups in Prison: A Pragmatic Feasibility and Impact Study. Characterization of Dermatologic Disease and Challenges in Care of Incarcerated Patients. The Development, Delivery, Content, and Impact of Nutrition Education in Prisons: A Systematic Review. An Assessment of the Nutritional Profile of Foods Accessible to Incarcerated Males in Alabama. Resident Experiences at a Community Hospital Caring for Patients Who Are Incarcerated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1