{"title":"约旦和阿联酋法律中以电子监控替代剥夺自由的规定","authors":"","doi":"10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study delves into the legislative and practical landscapes governing\nelectronic monitoring within the legal frameworks of Jordan and the United Arab\nEmirates (UAE). It meticulously examines the similarities and disparities between\nthe legislative strategies employed by both nations, delineating how the UAE's\napproach encompasses a wider array of applications and more stringent penalties\nfor infringements, contrasting with Jordan's more discretionary stance, particularly\nemphasizing misdemeanor sentences. Despite these nuanced distinctions, both\njurisdictions confront hurdles in the efficacious implementation and regulation of\nelectronic surveillance. The study extends recommendations aimed at legislative\nenhancements and refinements in both countries to confront these challenges and\nbolster the efficacy of electronic monitoring systems.","PeriodicalId":516769,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","volume":"83 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Deprivation of Liberty in Jordanian and Emirati Law\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study delves into the legislative and practical landscapes governing\\nelectronic monitoring within the legal frameworks of Jordan and the United Arab\\nEmirates (UAE). It meticulously examines the similarities and disparities between\\nthe legislative strategies employed by both nations, delineating how the UAE's\\napproach encompasses a wider array of applications and more stringent penalties\\nfor infringements, contrasting with Jordan's more discretionary stance, particularly\\nemphasizing misdemeanor sentences. Despite these nuanced distinctions, both\\njurisdictions confront hurdles in the efficacious implementation and regulation of\\nelectronic surveillance. The study extends recommendations aimed at legislative\\nenhancements and refinements in both countries to confront these challenges and\\nbolster the efficacy of electronic monitoring systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"83 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.467.482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electronic Monitoring as an Alternative to Deprivation of Liberty in Jordanian and Emirati Law
The study delves into the legislative and practical landscapes governing
electronic monitoring within the legal frameworks of Jordan and the United Arab
Emirates (UAE). It meticulously examines the similarities and disparities between
the legislative strategies employed by both nations, delineating how the UAE's
approach encompasses a wider array of applications and more stringent penalties
for infringements, contrasting with Jordan's more discretionary stance, particularly
emphasizing misdemeanor sentences. Despite these nuanced distinctions, both
jurisdictions confront hurdles in the efficacious implementation and regulation of
electronic surveillance. The study extends recommendations aimed at legislative
enhancements and refinements in both countries to confront these challenges and
bolster the efficacy of electronic monitoring systems.