解密网络和云取证的法律、道德和实际考虑因素

{"title":"解密网络和云取证的法律、道德和实际考虑因素","authors":"","doi":"10.62271/pjc.16.2.119.132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As cybercrimes grow more sophisticated, network and cloud forensics\nhave become vital investigative tools. However, complex legal, ethical, and\npractical challenges around extraterritorial evidence, privacy rights, volatile data,\nand specialized skills constrain these processes. This study critically reviews\nacademic literature and industry reports to examine these multifaceted\nconsiderations holistically. It aims to aggregate the latest insights around\nregulations, technical protocols, certification regimes, and international\ncooperation frameworks shaping network and cloud forensics. The study follows\nqualitative research methodology, a doctrinal approach used for the analysis of\nregulation, and grounded theory used for the analysis of related literature. The\nresults reveal gaps around the liability limitations of internet service and cloud\nproviders, ethical bounds for ancillary data collection, and anti-forensic\nobfuscation techniques. Proposed solutions include accountability in technology\ndesign through transparency and oversight. Simplify procedures for cross-border\nlegal assistance requests. Develop lightweight encryption methods that still enable\nlawful access as well as promote collaboration between industry and academia to\nadvance cybersecurity tools.","PeriodicalId":516769,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying the Network and Cloud Forensics’ Legal, Ethical, and Practical Considerations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.62271/pjc.16.2.119.132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As cybercrimes grow more sophisticated, network and cloud forensics\\nhave become vital investigative tools. However, complex legal, ethical, and\\npractical challenges around extraterritorial evidence, privacy rights, volatile data,\\nand specialized skills constrain these processes. This study critically reviews\\nacademic literature and industry reports to examine these multifaceted\\nconsiderations holistically. It aims to aggregate the latest insights around\\nregulations, technical protocols, certification regimes, and international\\ncooperation frameworks shaping network and cloud forensics. The study follows\\nqualitative research methodology, a doctrinal approach used for the analysis of\\nregulation, and grounded theory used for the analysis of related literature. The\\nresults reveal gaps around the liability limitations of internet service and cloud\\nproviders, ethical bounds for ancillary data collection, and anti-forensic\\nobfuscation techniques. Proposed solutions include accountability in technology\\ndesign through transparency and oversight. Simplify procedures for cross-border\\nlegal assistance requests. Develop lightweight encryption methods that still enable\\nlawful access as well as promote collaboration between industry and academia to\\nadvance cybersecurity tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.119.132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62271/pjc.16.2.119.132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着网络犯罪日益复杂,网络和云取证已成为重要的调查工具。然而,围绕域外证据、隐私权、不稳定数据和专业技能的复杂法律、道德和实践挑战限制了这些过程。本研究批判性地回顾了学术文献和行业报告,以全面考察这些多方面的考虑因素。本研究旨在汇集有关影响网络和云取证的法规、技术协议、认证制度和国际合作框架的最新见解。本研究采用定性研究方法,在分析法规时采用理论方法,在分析相关文献时采用基础理论。研究结果揭示了在互联网服务和云提供商的责任限制、辅助数据收集的伦理界限以及反取证混淆技术等方面存在的差距。建议的解决方案包括通过透明度和监督对技术设计进行问责。简化跨境法律协助请求程序。开发仍能实现非法访问的轻量级加密方法,并促进产业界和学术界合作,推动网络安全工具的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demystifying the Network and Cloud Forensics’ Legal, Ethical, and Practical Considerations
As cybercrimes grow more sophisticated, network and cloud forensics have become vital investigative tools. However, complex legal, ethical, and practical challenges around extraterritorial evidence, privacy rights, volatile data, and specialized skills constrain these processes. This study critically reviews academic literature and industry reports to examine these multifaceted considerations holistically. It aims to aggregate the latest insights around regulations, technical protocols, certification regimes, and international cooperation frameworks shaping network and cloud forensics. The study follows qualitative research methodology, a doctrinal approach used for the analysis of regulation, and grounded theory used for the analysis of related literature. The results reveal gaps around the liability limitations of internet service and cloud providers, ethical bounds for ancillary data collection, and anti-forensic obfuscation techniques. Proposed solutions include accountability in technology design through transparency and oversight. Simplify procedures for cross-border legal assistance requests. Develop lightweight encryption methods that still enable lawful access as well as promote collaboration between industry and academia to advance cybersecurity tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of a Restitution Model Based on Justice and Legal Certainty for Crime Victims in Indonesia The Problem of Jurisdictional Conflict and the Applicable Law on Cybercrime Assessing Human Impact on Coral Reef Ecosystems in Berau Regency, Indonesia: Implications for Conservation and Sustainable Tourism Development Legal Mechanism to Ensure the Sovereignty of a State’s Membership in the EU and NATO Development of the Organisational and Legal Mechanism of State Control of Local Self- Government in Ensuring the Territorial Integrity of Ukraine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1