{"title":"渗透者和野兽","authors":"Massimiliano Demata","doi":"10.1075/jlp.23084.dem","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper addresses Benjamin Netanyahu’s border discourse in the context of radical right-wing populism. It\n discusses how, in the speeches and statements appearing in his official government website, Netanyahu construes groups located\n spatially outside Israel’s borders, mainly terrorists and migrants (the “wild beasts” and the “infiltrators”), as existential\n threats to Israel. The aim is to prove that, in legitimizing the militarization of borders through “security fences”, so that the\n “other” can be excluded from the nation, Netanyahu uses the same power geometries and discursive strategies, i.e. Proximization\n (Cap 2013) and dehumanizing metaphors (Santa\n Ana 1999, Musolff 2015, Taylor\n 2021), typically used by right-wing populist parties and leaders. By appealing to both populism and certain\n interpretations of Zionism, his ethnonationalist view of borders is based on the normalization of the discourse of delegitimation\n and exclusion of those groups considered as a threat to the nation.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Of infiltrators and wild beasts\",\"authors\":\"Massimiliano Demata\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlp.23084.dem\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper addresses Benjamin Netanyahu’s border discourse in the context of radical right-wing populism. It\\n discusses how, in the speeches and statements appearing in his official government website, Netanyahu construes groups located\\n spatially outside Israel’s borders, mainly terrorists and migrants (the “wild beasts” and the “infiltrators”), as existential\\n threats to Israel. The aim is to prove that, in legitimizing the militarization of borders through “security fences”, so that the\\n “other” can be excluded from the nation, Netanyahu uses the same power geometries and discursive strategies, i.e. Proximization\\n (Cap 2013) and dehumanizing metaphors (Santa\\n Ana 1999, Musolff 2015, Taylor\\n 2021), typically used by right-wing populist parties and leaders. By appealing to both populism and certain\\n interpretations of Zionism, his ethnonationalist view of borders is based on the normalization of the discourse of delegitimation\\n and exclusion of those groups considered as a threat to the nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23084.dem\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.23084.dem","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper addresses Benjamin Netanyahu’s border discourse in the context of radical right-wing populism. It
discusses how, in the speeches and statements appearing in his official government website, Netanyahu construes groups located
spatially outside Israel’s borders, mainly terrorists and migrants (the “wild beasts” and the “infiltrators”), as existential
threats to Israel. The aim is to prove that, in legitimizing the militarization of borders through “security fences”, so that the
“other” can be excluded from the nation, Netanyahu uses the same power geometries and discursive strategies, i.e. Proximization
(Cap 2013) and dehumanizing metaphors (Santa
Ana 1999, Musolff 2015, Taylor
2021), typically used by right-wing populist parties and leaders. By appealing to both populism and certain
interpretations of Zionism, his ethnonationalist view of borders is based on the normalization of the discourse of delegitimation
and exclusion of those groups considered as a threat to the nation.