肝脏手术围手术期静脉注射利多卡因的安全性--一项试点研究

Pierre Grassin, Richard Descamps, J. Bourgine, Jean Lubrano, A. Fiant, Véronique Lelong-Boulouard, J. Hanouz
{"title":"肝脏手术围手术期静脉注射利多卡因的安全性--一项试点研究","authors":"Pierre Grassin, Richard Descamps, J. Bourgine, Jean Lubrano, A. Fiant, Véronique Lelong-Boulouard, J. Hanouz","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_391_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Perioperative lidocaine infusion has many interesting properties such as analgesic effects in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery. However, its use is limited in liver surgery due to its hepatic metabolism.\n \n \n \n This prospective, monocentric study was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Patients undergoing liver surgery were included. They received a lidocaine infusion protocol until the beginning of hepatic transection (bolus dose of 1.5 mg kg−1, then a continuous infusion of 2 mg kg−1 h-1). Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured four times during and after lidocaine infusion.\n \n \n \n Twenty subjects who underwent liver resection were analyzed. There was 35% of preexisting liver disease before tumor diagnosis, and 75% of liver resection was defined as “major hepatectomy.” Plasmatic levels of lidocaine were in the therapeutic range. No blood sample showed a concentration above the toxicity threshold: 1.6 (1.3–2.1) mg ml−1 one hour after the start of infusion, 2.5 (1.7–2.8) mg ml−1 at the end of hepatic transection, 1.7 (1.3–2.0) mg ml−1 one hour after the end of infusion, and 1.2 (0.8–1.4) mg ml−1 at the end of surgery. Comparative analysis between the presence of a preexisting liver disease or not and the association of intraoperative vascular clamping or not did not show significant difference concerning lidocaine blood levels.\n \n \n \n Perioperative lidocaine infusion seems safe in the field of liver surgery. Nevertheless, additional prospective studies need to assess the clinical usefulness in terms of analgesia and antitumoral effects.\n","PeriodicalId":508221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"213 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in liver surgery – A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Pierre Grassin, Richard Descamps, J. Bourgine, Jean Lubrano, A. Fiant, Véronique Lelong-Boulouard, J. Hanouz\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/joacp.joacp_391_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Perioperative lidocaine infusion has many interesting properties such as analgesic effects in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery. However, its use is limited in liver surgery due to its hepatic metabolism.\\n \\n \\n \\n This prospective, monocentric study was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Patients undergoing liver surgery were included. They received a lidocaine infusion protocol until the beginning of hepatic transection (bolus dose of 1.5 mg kg−1, then a continuous infusion of 2 mg kg−1 h-1). Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured four times during and after lidocaine infusion.\\n \\n \\n \\n Twenty subjects who underwent liver resection were analyzed. There was 35% of preexisting liver disease before tumor diagnosis, and 75% of liver resection was defined as “major hepatectomy.” Plasmatic levels of lidocaine were in the therapeutic range. No blood sample showed a concentration above the toxicity threshold: 1.6 (1.3–2.1) mg ml−1 one hour after the start of infusion, 2.5 (1.7–2.8) mg ml−1 at the end of hepatic transection, 1.7 (1.3–2.0) mg ml−1 one hour after the end of infusion, and 1.2 (0.8–1.4) mg ml−1 at the end of surgery. Comparative analysis between the presence of a preexisting liver disease or not and the association of intraoperative vascular clamping or not did not show significant difference concerning lidocaine blood levels.\\n \\n \\n \\n Perioperative lidocaine infusion seems safe in the field of liver surgery. Nevertheless, additional prospective studies need to assess the clinical usefulness in terms of analgesia and antitumoral effects.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":508221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"213 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_391_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_391_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

围手术期利多卡因输注具有许多有趣的特性,例如在促进术后恢复方面的镇痛效果。然而,由于利多卡因的肝脏代谢作用,它在肝脏手术中的应用受到限制。 这项前瞻性单中心研究于 2020 年至 2021 年进行。研究对象包括接受肝脏手术的患者。他们接受利多卡因输注方案,直到肝横断开始(栓塞剂量为 1.5 毫克/公斤-1,然后持续输注 2 毫克/公斤-1 小时-1)。在利多卡因输注过程中和输注后,对利多卡因的血浆浓度进行了四次测量。 对 20 名接受肝脏切除术的受试者进行了分析。35%的受试者在肿瘤确诊前已患有肝脏疾病,75%的肝脏切除术被定义为 "主要肝切除术"。血浆中利多卡因的浓度处于治疗范围内。没有血液样本显示浓度超过毒性阈值:输液开始一小时后为 1.6 (1.3-2.1) mg ml-1,肝横断术结束时为 2.5 (1.7-2.8) mg ml-1,输液结束一小时后为 1.7 (1.3-2.0) mg ml-1,手术结束时为 1.2 (0.8-1.4) mg ml-1。对是否存在肝脏疾病以及术中是否进行血管夹闭进行比较分析后发现,利多卡因血药浓度并无显著差异。 在肝脏手术领域,围手术期输注利多卡因似乎是安全的。不过,还需要更多的前瞻性研究来评估利多卡因在镇痛和抗肿瘤方面的临床作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of perioperative intravenous lidocaine in liver surgery – A pilot study
Perioperative lidocaine infusion has many interesting properties such as analgesic effects in the context of enhanced recovery after surgery. However, its use is limited in liver surgery due to its hepatic metabolism. This prospective, monocentric study was conducted from 2020 to 2021. Patients undergoing liver surgery were included. They received a lidocaine infusion protocol until the beginning of hepatic transection (bolus dose of 1.5 mg kg−1, then a continuous infusion of 2 mg kg−1 h-1). Plasma concentrations of lidocaine were measured four times during and after lidocaine infusion. Twenty subjects who underwent liver resection were analyzed. There was 35% of preexisting liver disease before tumor diagnosis, and 75% of liver resection was defined as “major hepatectomy.” Plasmatic levels of lidocaine were in the therapeutic range. No blood sample showed a concentration above the toxicity threshold: 1.6 (1.3–2.1) mg ml−1 one hour after the start of infusion, 2.5 (1.7–2.8) mg ml−1 at the end of hepatic transection, 1.7 (1.3–2.0) mg ml−1 one hour after the end of infusion, and 1.2 (0.8–1.4) mg ml−1 at the end of surgery. Comparative analysis between the presence of a preexisting liver disease or not and the association of intraoperative vascular clamping or not did not show significant difference concerning lidocaine blood levels. Perioperative lidocaine infusion seems safe in the field of liver surgery. Nevertheless, additional prospective studies need to assess the clinical usefulness in terms of analgesia and antitumoral effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block in truncal surgeries: A narrative review Anesthetic challenges in using posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for phaeochromocytoma in pregnancy A case of lost endotracheal tube PONV, beyond “Apfel” score Clinical experience with stellate ganglion block in a neonate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1