评估缓解后癫痫复发的成年癫痫患者的药物治疗效果

E. A. Sandu, A. S. Kotov
{"title":"评估缓解后癫痫复发的成年癫痫患者的药物治疗效果","authors":"E. A. Sandu, A. S. Kotov","doi":"10.17650/2073-8803-2024-19-1-18-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Remission in general sense means disappearance of signs and symptoms of the disease. The risk of recurrence of seizures is usually evaluated only in terms of the risk of a second unprovoked seizure after the first one or the risk of recurrence of seizures after discontinuation of therapy. There are no studies that assess the probability of achieving a second remission in patients with recurrent seizures.Aim. To develop a tool for assessing the probability of favorable and unfavorable treatment outcomes after recurrent seizures in adult patients with different forms of epilepsy.Materials and methods. We analyzed data from 215 patients with recurrent seizures after achieving remission, followed up for 12 or more months, and analyzed disease outcomes.Results and conclusion. At the end of the study, repeat remission was observed in 67 patients, improvement in 48, and no effect in 100. Patients with remission and improvement were combined into a “favorable outcome” group (n = 115), while patients with no effect from therapy formed an “unfavorable outcome” group (n = 100).Patients with an unfavorable outcome were statistically significantly more likely to have factors such as longer disease duration, coexisting serious somatic diseases, structural etiology of epilepsy, bilateral tonic-clonic seizures with focal onset, focal forms of epilepsy, daily seizures, epileptogenic changes on neuroimaging, and regional epileptiform activity on EEG (p <0.05). In turn, patients with a favorable outcome were statistically significantly more likely to have factors such as genetic etiology of epilepsy, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, absences, myoclonic seizures, generalized forms of epilepsy, no pathology on neuroimaging, diffuse epileptiform activity on electroencephalogram, and no pathology on electroencephalogram (p <0.05).Based on the obtained data using the results of constructing contingency tables, a scale for assessing the probability of achieving repeat remission in patients with recurrent epileptic seizures was developed, consisting of 9 sections. To assess the effectiveness of the model, ROC analysis was performed, confirming statistically significant sensitivity and specificity of the obtained scale.Further research is needed to develop more accurate predictors of epilepsy outcomes to understand the peculiarities of the disease pathogenesis.","PeriodicalId":196950,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the outcome of drug therapy in adult patients with epilepsy who have experienced seizure recurrence after remission\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Sandu, A. S. Kotov\",\"doi\":\"10.17650/2073-8803-2024-19-1-18-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Remission in general sense means disappearance of signs and symptoms of the disease. The risk of recurrence of seizures is usually evaluated only in terms of the risk of a second unprovoked seizure after the first one or the risk of recurrence of seizures after discontinuation of therapy. There are no studies that assess the probability of achieving a second remission in patients with recurrent seizures.Aim. To develop a tool for assessing the probability of favorable and unfavorable treatment outcomes after recurrent seizures in adult patients with different forms of epilepsy.Materials and methods. We analyzed data from 215 patients with recurrent seizures after achieving remission, followed up for 12 or more months, and analyzed disease outcomes.Results and conclusion. At the end of the study, repeat remission was observed in 67 patients, improvement in 48, and no effect in 100. Patients with remission and improvement were combined into a “favorable outcome” group (n = 115), while patients with no effect from therapy formed an “unfavorable outcome” group (n = 100).Patients with an unfavorable outcome were statistically significantly more likely to have factors such as longer disease duration, coexisting serious somatic diseases, structural etiology of epilepsy, bilateral tonic-clonic seizures with focal onset, focal forms of epilepsy, daily seizures, epileptogenic changes on neuroimaging, and regional epileptiform activity on EEG (p <0.05). In turn, patients with a favorable outcome were statistically significantly more likely to have factors such as genetic etiology of epilepsy, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, absences, myoclonic seizures, generalized forms of epilepsy, no pathology on neuroimaging, diffuse epileptiform activity on electroencephalogram, and no pathology on electroencephalogram (p <0.05).Based on the obtained data using the results of constructing contingency tables, a scale for assessing the probability of achieving repeat remission in patients with recurrent epileptic seizures was developed, consisting of 9 sections. To assess the effectiveness of the model, ROC analysis was performed, confirming statistically significant sensitivity and specificity of the obtained scale.Further research is needed to develop more accurate predictors of epilepsy outcomes to understand the peculiarities of the disease pathogenesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2024-19-1-18-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/2073-8803-2024-19-1-18-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。一般意义上的缓解是指疾病症状和体征的消失。对癫痫复发风险的评估通常仅从第一次发作后第二次无诱因发作的风险或停止治疗后癫痫复发的风险两个方面进行。目前还没有研究对复发性癫痫患者获得第二次缓解的概率进行评估。开发一种工具,用于评估不同形式癫痫的成年患者复发后获得有利和不利治疗结果的概率。我们分析了215名获得缓解后复发的癫痫患者的数据,对其进行了12个月或更长时间的随访,并对疾病结果进行了分析。研究结束时,67 名患者病情再次缓解,48 名患者病情好转,100 名患者病情无影响。病情缓解和好转的患者被合并为 "有利结果 "组(115 人),而治疗无效果的患者被合并为 "不利结果 "组(100 人)。从统计学角度看,"疗效不佳 "组患者更有可能存在以下因素:病程较长、合并严重躯体疾病、癫痫的结构性病因、双侧强直阵挛发作伴局灶、局灶性癫痫形式、每日发作、神经影像学上的致痫性改变以及脑电图上的区域性癫痫样活动(P <0.05)。反过来,在统计学上,癫痫遗传病因、全身强直-阵挛发作、缺席、肌阵挛发作、全身性癫痫、神经影像学无病理改变、脑电图弥漫性痫样活动、脑电图无病理改变等因素的患者更有可能获得良好的治疗结果(P <0.05)。根据利用或然率表构建结果所获得的数据,制定了评估癫痫反复发作患者获得重复缓解概率的量表,该量表由 9 个部分组成。为评估该模型的有效性,进行了ROC分析,证实所获得的量表在统计学上具有显著的敏感性和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the outcome of drug therapy in adult patients with epilepsy who have experienced seizure recurrence after remission
Background. Remission in general sense means disappearance of signs and symptoms of the disease. The risk of recurrence of seizures is usually evaluated only in terms of the risk of a second unprovoked seizure after the first one or the risk of recurrence of seizures after discontinuation of therapy. There are no studies that assess the probability of achieving a second remission in patients with recurrent seizures.Aim. To develop a tool for assessing the probability of favorable and unfavorable treatment outcomes after recurrent seizures in adult patients with different forms of epilepsy.Materials and methods. We analyzed data from 215 patients with recurrent seizures after achieving remission, followed up for 12 or more months, and analyzed disease outcomes.Results and conclusion. At the end of the study, repeat remission was observed in 67 patients, improvement in 48, and no effect in 100. Patients with remission and improvement were combined into a “favorable outcome” group (n = 115), while patients with no effect from therapy formed an “unfavorable outcome” group (n = 100).Patients with an unfavorable outcome were statistically significantly more likely to have factors such as longer disease duration, coexisting serious somatic diseases, structural etiology of epilepsy, bilateral tonic-clonic seizures with focal onset, focal forms of epilepsy, daily seizures, epileptogenic changes on neuroimaging, and regional epileptiform activity on EEG (p <0.05). In turn, patients with a favorable outcome were statistically significantly more likely to have factors such as genetic etiology of epilepsy, generalized tonic-clonic seizures, absences, myoclonic seizures, generalized forms of epilepsy, no pathology on neuroimaging, diffuse epileptiform activity on electroencephalogram, and no pathology on electroencephalogram (p <0.05).Based on the obtained data using the results of constructing contingency tables, a scale for assessing the probability of achieving repeat remission in patients with recurrent epileptic seizures was developed, consisting of 9 sections. To assess the effectiveness of the model, ROC analysis was performed, confirming statistically significant sensitivity and specificity of the obtained scale.Further research is needed to develop more accurate predictors of epilepsy outcomes to understand the peculiarities of the disease pathogenesis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The path from theory to practice in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy Clinical polymorphism of myelitis in neurologic practice. Lecture with description of clinical cases Local intracerebral form of diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor – a new entity of the group of epileptogenic neoplasms? Mitochondrial DNA depletion syndrome 13. A case report Pontocerebellar hypoplasia caused by the TSEN54 mutation: clinical and electroencephalographic characteristics based on 3 cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1