质子泵抑制剂与肾病:事实还是虚构?

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1159/000538755
Matthew Ryan Weir
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂与肾病:事实还是虚构?","authors":"Matthew Ryan Weir","doi":"10.1159/000538755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nProton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly prescribed medications for dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux. There are concerns about their use in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD).\n\n\nSUMMARY\nThe available published literature fails to support an association with PPI and the development of CKD. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrate no difference on the incidence of CKD between placebo and PPI. If one examines the data according to the Bradford Hill perspective incorporating temporal relationship, strength of association, dose response relationship, replacement of findings, cessation of exposure, specificity of the association and consistency with other knowledge, one can only conclude that there is no consistent relationship between PPI use and the development of CKD, or its progression.\n\n\nKEY MESSAGES\nThere is insufficient evidence to link PPI exposure with the development or progression of CKD.","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton Pump Inhibitors and Kidney Disease: Fact or Fiction?\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Ryan Weir\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000538755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nProton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly prescribed medications for dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux. There are concerns about their use in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD).\\n\\n\\nSUMMARY\\nThe available published literature fails to support an association with PPI and the development of CKD. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrate no difference on the incidence of CKD between placebo and PPI. If one examines the data according to the Bradford Hill perspective incorporating temporal relationship, strength of association, dose response relationship, replacement of findings, cessation of exposure, specificity of the association and consistency with other knowledge, one can only conclude that there is no consistent relationship between PPI use and the development of CKD, or its progression.\\n\\n\\nKEY MESSAGES\\nThere is insufficient evidence to link PPI exposure with the development or progression of CKD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Nephrology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000538755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景质子泵抑制剂(PPI)是治疗消化不良和胃食管反流的常用处方药。摘要 已发表的文献未能证实 PPI 与慢性肾脏病(CKD)的发生有关。安慰剂对照试验表明,安慰剂和 PPI 的 CKD 发生率没有差异。如果按照布拉德福德-希尔(Bradford Hill)的观点(包括时间关系、关联强度、剂量反应关系、研究结果的替代性、接触的停止、关联的特异性以及与其他知识的一致性)来审查数据,只能得出这样的结论:PPI 的使用与 CKD 的发生或发展之间不存在一致的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Proton Pump Inhibitors and Kidney Disease: Fact or Fiction?
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are commonly prescribed medications for dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux. There are concerns about their use in the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD). SUMMARY The available published literature fails to support an association with PPI and the development of CKD. Placebo-controlled trials demonstrate no difference on the incidence of CKD between placebo and PPI. If one examines the data according to the Bradford Hill perspective incorporating temporal relationship, strength of association, dose response relationship, replacement of findings, cessation of exposure, specificity of the association and consistency with other knowledge, one can only conclude that there is no consistent relationship between PPI use and the development of CKD, or its progression. KEY MESSAGES There is insufficient evidence to link PPI exposure with the development or progression of CKD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
期刊最新文献
Off-label Use of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urinary sodium excretion and kidney disease progression in IgA nephropathy: A cohort study. A risk prediction model for new-onset chronic kidney disease in the elderly. Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Upacicalcet in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Open-label 52-week Study. Association between timing of vascular access creation and mortality in patients initiating hemodialysis: A nationwide cohort study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1