NACA 0015 机翼修改后的后缘在低雷诺数时的后缘噪声数值预测

Q2 Mathematics CFD Letters Pub Date : 2024-04-05 DOI:10.37934/cfdl.16.8.6494
Mohamed Ibren, A. D. Andan, W. Asrar, Dianne Binti Andan
{"title":"NACA 0015 机翼修改后的后缘在低雷诺数时的后缘噪声数值预测","authors":"Mohamed Ibren, A. D. Andan, W. Asrar, Dianne Binti Andan","doi":"10.37934/cfdl.16.8.6494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global concern about high noise levels in areas near airports and wind farms has generated interest from various groups due to factors such as potential health problems and dissatisfaction among the local community. To accommodate this worthwhile plan of further reducing overall noise levels, some researchers are working on lowering the contribution of trailing-edge noise. The original scientific contribution of this study lies on understanding the efficiency of various trailing edge designs such as baseline, serrations, comb and comb-serrated, across different angles of attack and Reynolds numbers, while also addressing the limitations of existing geometrical models for trailing edges. The study intends to examine the performance of these different configurations, with an emphasis on their effect on acoustic responses. By utilizing large-eddy simulation and applying the Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings models for noise prediction, an investigation was conducted to assess the impact of these trailing edge configurations on radiated noise at a low Reynolds number of 1.6× 105. The numerical predictions of lift coefficient and surface pressure fluctuations are compared and validated with a published study and experimental data, showing satisfactory results. Further analysis of these study has demonstrated that prominent peaks at lower frequencies (<103) are observed, which are identified as the characteristic frequencies. Moreover, results showed irregular broadband noise (300 - 600 Hz) with increased noise and shifting peak frequency as angle of attack rose. The serrated trailing edge design notably reduced noise levels by roughly 21 dB, especially for low frequencies. Comb-serration increased high-frequency noise by about 9 dB for angles of attack at 0, -1, and -20, and achieved a reduction of approximately 9 dB for angles of attack at 1 and 20. On the other hand, the directivity pattern showed that the maximum noise level is observed to predominantly radiate at an azimuth angle of around 90 degrees for all the cases, ranging from 900 to 2700, indicating that the majority of the source's acoustic energy is being emitted on the suction and pressure sides of the airfoil.","PeriodicalId":9736,"journal":{"name":"CFD Letters","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Prediction of Trailing Edge Noise at Low Reynolds Number with Modified Trailing Edges of a NACA 0015 Airfoil\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Ibren, A. D. Andan, W. Asrar, Dianne Binti Andan\",\"doi\":\"10.37934/cfdl.16.8.6494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Global concern about high noise levels in areas near airports and wind farms has generated interest from various groups due to factors such as potential health problems and dissatisfaction among the local community. To accommodate this worthwhile plan of further reducing overall noise levels, some researchers are working on lowering the contribution of trailing-edge noise. The original scientific contribution of this study lies on understanding the efficiency of various trailing edge designs such as baseline, serrations, comb and comb-serrated, across different angles of attack and Reynolds numbers, while also addressing the limitations of existing geometrical models for trailing edges. The study intends to examine the performance of these different configurations, with an emphasis on their effect on acoustic responses. By utilizing large-eddy simulation and applying the Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings models for noise prediction, an investigation was conducted to assess the impact of these trailing edge configurations on radiated noise at a low Reynolds number of 1.6× 105. The numerical predictions of lift coefficient and surface pressure fluctuations are compared and validated with a published study and experimental data, showing satisfactory results. Further analysis of these study has demonstrated that prominent peaks at lower frequencies (<103) are observed, which are identified as the characteristic frequencies. Moreover, results showed irregular broadband noise (300 - 600 Hz) with increased noise and shifting peak frequency as angle of attack rose. The serrated trailing edge design notably reduced noise levels by roughly 21 dB, especially for low frequencies. Comb-serration increased high-frequency noise by about 9 dB for angles of attack at 0, -1, and -20, and achieved a reduction of approximately 9 dB for angles of attack at 1 and 20. On the other hand, the directivity pattern showed that the maximum noise level is observed to predominantly radiate at an azimuth angle of around 90 degrees for all the cases, ranging from 900 to 2700, indicating that the majority of the source's acoustic energy is being emitted on the suction and pressure sides of the airfoil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CFD Letters\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CFD Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.16.8.6494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CFD Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/cfdl.16.8.6494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于潜在的健康问题和当地社区的不满等因素,全球对机场和风力发电场附近地区高噪音水平的关注引起了不同团体的兴趣。为了满足进一步降低整体噪声水平这一有价值的计划,一些研究人员正在努力降低尾流噪声的贡献。本研究的原始科学贡献在于了解各种后缘设计(如基线、锯齿、梳齿和梳齿锯齿)在不同攻角和雷诺数下的效率,同时解决现有后缘几何模型的局限性。本研究旨在检查这些不同配置的性能,重点是它们对声学响应的影响。通过利用大涡流模拟并应用 Ffowcs-Williams 和 Hawkings 模型进行噪声预测,研究评估了这些后缘配置在 1.6× 105 低雷诺数条件下对辐射噪声的影响。升力系数和表面压力波动的数值预测与已发表的研究和实验数据进行了比较和验证,结果令人满意。对这些研究的进一步分析表明,在较低频率(<103)处观察到突出的峰值,这些峰值被确定为特征频率。此外,结果还显示出不规则的宽带噪声(300 - 600 Hz),随着攻角的增大,噪声增大,峰值频率发生变化。锯齿状后缘设计明显降低了约 21 分贝的噪声水平,尤其是低频噪声。在攻角为 0、-1 和 -20 时,组合锯齿使高频噪声增加了约 9 分贝,在攻角为 1 和 20 时,噪声降低了约 9 分贝。另一方面,指向性模式显示,在所有情况下,最大噪声水平主要在方位角约为 90 度(从 900 度到 2700 度)处辐射,这表明声源的大部分声能是在机翼的吸气侧和压力侧发射的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Numerical Prediction of Trailing Edge Noise at Low Reynolds Number with Modified Trailing Edges of a NACA 0015 Airfoil
Global concern about high noise levels in areas near airports and wind farms has generated interest from various groups due to factors such as potential health problems and dissatisfaction among the local community. To accommodate this worthwhile plan of further reducing overall noise levels, some researchers are working on lowering the contribution of trailing-edge noise. The original scientific contribution of this study lies on understanding the efficiency of various trailing edge designs such as baseline, serrations, comb and comb-serrated, across different angles of attack and Reynolds numbers, while also addressing the limitations of existing geometrical models for trailing edges. The study intends to examine the performance of these different configurations, with an emphasis on their effect on acoustic responses. By utilizing large-eddy simulation and applying the Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings models for noise prediction, an investigation was conducted to assess the impact of these trailing edge configurations on radiated noise at a low Reynolds number of 1.6× 105. The numerical predictions of lift coefficient and surface pressure fluctuations are compared and validated with a published study and experimental data, showing satisfactory results. Further analysis of these study has demonstrated that prominent peaks at lower frequencies (<103) are observed, which are identified as the characteristic frequencies. Moreover, results showed irregular broadband noise (300 - 600 Hz) with increased noise and shifting peak frequency as angle of attack rose. The serrated trailing edge design notably reduced noise levels by roughly 21 dB, especially for low frequencies. Comb-serration increased high-frequency noise by about 9 dB for angles of attack at 0, -1, and -20, and achieved a reduction of approximately 9 dB for angles of attack at 1 and 20. On the other hand, the directivity pattern showed that the maximum noise level is observed to predominantly radiate at an azimuth angle of around 90 degrees for all the cases, ranging from 900 to 2700, indicating that the majority of the source's acoustic energy is being emitted on the suction and pressure sides of the airfoil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CFD Letters
CFD Letters Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Numerical Investigation of Thermal Performance for Turbulent Water Flow through Dimpled Pipe MHD Stagnation Point Flow of Micropolar Fluid over a Stretching/ Shrinking Sheet Unsteady MHD Walter’s-B Viscoelastic Flow Past a Vertical Porous Plate Effects of Activation Energy and Diffusion Thermo an Unsteady MHD Maxwell Fluid Flow over a Porous Vertical Stretched Sheet in the Presence of Thermophoresis and Brownian Motion Effect of Inlet Pressure on the Polyurethane Spray Nozzle for Soil Cracking Improvement: Simulations using CFD Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1