Asghar Hajipour, Alireza Montaseri, M. Rahimi, Amirhossein Orandi, Laila Rahmah, S. Samadi
{"title":"硬膜外镇痛对剖腹产率和新生儿结局的影响:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Asghar Hajipour, Alireza Montaseri, M. Rahimi, Amirhossein Orandi, Laila Rahmah, S. Samadi","doi":"10.18502/acta.v61i9.15284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the frequency of emergency cesarean sections with epidural analgesia and its implications on Apgar scores and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admissions among patients at Tehran University of Medical Sciences Hospitals from 2017 to 2018. Data from 7170 patients were extracted from the hospital information system (HIS) through a consensus method. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, and logistic regression analyses were conducted using Stata v17 software. Out of 9387 patients, 62.7% underwent cesarean sections, and 37.1% had normal vaginal deliveries. Epidural analgesia was administered to 127 patients, with 98.4% achieving successful normal vaginal delivery. Nulliparous women constituted 64.29% of those receiving epidural analgesia. Apgar scores at five and ten minutes were comparable between epidural and non-epidural groups. Emergency cesarean rates with epidural analgesia were low (1.6%). Findings align with previous research indicating no significant impact of epidural analgesia on Apgar scores. Nulliparous women predominated in the epidural group, consistent with pain pattern disparities. The study supports recent research showing epidural analgesia does not increase emergency cesarean rates, even in high-risk pregnancies. This study suggests that epidural analgesia does not significantly impact Apgar scores, NICU admissions, or emergency cesarean rates. While the comprehensive dataset enhances reliability, retrospective design limitations are acknowledged. Prospective studies exploring factors contributing to neonatal mortality and overall labor duration are recommended for more robust evidence.","PeriodicalId":6946,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Iranica","volume":"14 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on Cesarean Section Rates and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Asghar Hajipour, Alireza Montaseri, M. Rahimi, Amirhossein Orandi, Laila Rahmah, S. Samadi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/acta.v61i9.15284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the frequency of emergency cesarean sections with epidural analgesia and its implications on Apgar scores and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admissions among patients at Tehran University of Medical Sciences Hospitals from 2017 to 2018. Data from 7170 patients were extracted from the hospital information system (HIS) through a consensus method. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, and logistic regression analyses were conducted using Stata v17 software. Out of 9387 patients, 62.7% underwent cesarean sections, and 37.1% had normal vaginal deliveries. Epidural analgesia was administered to 127 patients, with 98.4% achieving successful normal vaginal delivery. Nulliparous women constituted 64.29% of those receiving epidural analgesia. Apgar scores at five and ten minutes were comparable between epidural and non-epidural groups. Emergency cesarean rates with epidural analgesia were low (1.6%). Findings align with previous research indicating no significant impact of epidural analgesia on Apgar scores. Nulliparous women predominated in the epidural group, consistent with pain pattern disparities. The study supports recent research showing epidural analgesia does not increase emergency cesarean rates, even in high-risk pregnancies. This study suggests that epidural analgesia does not significantly impact Apgar scores, NICU admissions, or emergency cesarean rates. While the comprehensive dataset enhances reliability, retrospective design limitations are acknowledged. Prospective studies exploring factors contributing to neonatal mortality and overall labor duration are recommended for more robust evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica Iranica\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica Iranica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i9.15284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Iranica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/acta.v61i9.15284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项回顾性队列研究旨在评估德黑兰医科大学附属医院2017年至2018年使用硬膜外镇痛进行紧急剖宫产的频率及其对Apgar评分和新生儿重症监护室(NICU)收治患者的影响。通过协商一致的方法从医院信息系统(HIS)中提取了7170名患者的数据。使用 Stata v17 软件进行了描述性统计、交叉表和逻辑回归分析。在 9387 名患者中,62.7% 接受了剖宫产,37.1% 经阴道正常分娩。127名患者接受了硬膜外镇痛,98.4%的患者成功地经阴道正常分娩。接受硬膜外镇痛的产妇中,64.29%为无子宫产妇。硬膜外镇痛组和非硬膜外镇痛组在5分钟和10分钟时的Apgar评分相当。使用硬膜外镇痛的紧急剖宫产率较低(1.6%)。研究结果与之前的研究结果一致,表明硬膜外镇痛对Apgar评分没有显著影响。硬膜外镇痛组中主要是无子宫产妇,这与疼痛模式的差异一致。该研究支持最近的研究,即硬膜外镇痛不会增加紧急剖宫产率,即使在高危妊娠中也是如此。这项研究表明,硬膜外镇痛不会对阿普加评分、新生儿重症监护室入院率或紧急剖宫产率产生重大影响。虽然全面的数据集提高了可靠性,但回顾性设计的局限性也是公认的。建议进行前瞻性研究,探讨导致新生儿死亡率和总产程的因素,以获得更有力的证据。
The Impact of Epidural Analgesia on Cesarean Section Rates and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study
This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the frequency of emergency cesarean sections with epidural analgesia and its implications on Apgar scores and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admissions among patients at Tehran University of Medical Sciences Hospitals from 2017 to 2018. Data from 7170 patients were extracted from the hospital information system (HIS) through a consensus method. Descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation, and logistic regression analyses were conducted using Stata v17 software. Out of 9387 patients, 62.7% underwent cesarean sections, and 37.1% had normal vaginal deliveries. Epidural analgesia was administered to 127 patients, with 98.4% achieving successful normal vaginal delivery. Nulliparous women constituted 64.29% of those receiving epidural analgesia. Apgar scores at five and ten minutes were comparable between epidural and non-epidural groups. Emergency cesarean rates with epidural analgesia were low (1.6%). Findings align with previous research indicating no significant impact of epidural analgesia on Apgar scores. Nulliparous women predominated in the epidural group, consistent with pain pattern disparities. The study supports recent research showing epidural analgesia does not increase emergency cesarean rates, even in high-risk pregnancies. This study suggests that epidural analgesia does not significantly impact Apgar scores, NICU admissions, or emergency cesarean rates. While the comprehensive dataset enhances reliability, retrospective design limitations are acknowledged. Prospective studies exploring factors contributing to neonatal mortality and overall labor duration are recommended for more robust evidence.
期刊介绍:
ACTA MEDICA IRANICA (p. ISSN 0044-6025; e. ISSN: 1735-9694) is the official journal of the Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The journal is the oldest scientific medical journal of the country, which has been published from 1960 onward in English language. Although it had been published quarterly in the past, the journal has been published bimonthly (6 issues per year) from the year 2004. Acta Medica Iranica it is an international journal with multidisciplinary scope which publishes original research papers, review articles, case reports, and letters to the editor from all over the world. The journal has a wide scope and allows scientists, clinicians, and academic members to publish their original works in this field.