在日本,医生参与家庭医疗护理、住院护理或两者兼顾与他们护理多病老年患者的方法之间的关系

Takuma Kimura, Shinji Matsumura, Masayoshi Hashimoto, Ken Shinmura
{"title":"在日本,医生参与家庭医疗护理、住院护理或两者兼顾与他们护理多病老年患者的方法之间的关系","authors":"Takuma Kimura, Shinji Matsumura, Masayoshi Hashimoto, Ken Shinmura","doi":"10.1177/10848223241241822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Japan, little is known about the approaches to medical care for older patients with multimorbidity used by physicians either at patients’ homes or in hospitals. A questionnaire survey was conducted to understand the current approaches to older patients with multimorbidity. The questionnaire was sent to 3300 people, including 1650 geriatric specialists and 1650 primary care specialists, were enrolled. A four-point Likert-type scale was used to score the following items: diseases that cause difficulties in treatment (diseases), patient backgrounds that cause difficulties in treatment (backgrounds), important clinical factors, and important clinical strategies. We used the Tukey–Kramer test to examine the differences between scores across 3 groups: physicians providing only home care (the “home” group), physicians providing only inpatient care (the “hospital” group), and physicians providing both home care and inpatient care (the “home and hospital” group). Out of 836 valid responses, those from 587 physicians were included in the analysis. The overall score for diseases was significantly higher in the “hospital” group than in either the “home” or “home and hospital” groups. The overall score for important clinical strategies was significantly higher in the “home and hospital” group than in the “hospital” group. In conclusion, physicians’ approaches to treating older people with multimorbidity may vary by practice setting, and particularly whether they provide care only to patients at home or in hospital or to both. To improve the quality of transition of care between hospital and home, a support system that considers differences in physician practice should be developed.","PeriodicalId":512411,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management & Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Physicians’ Engagement in Home Medical Care, Inpatient Care or Both, and Their Approach to Caring for Older Patients With Multimorbidity in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Takuma Kimura, Shinji Matsumura, Masayoshi Hashimoto, Ken Shinmura\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10848223241241822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Japan, little is known about the approaches to medical care for older patients with multimorbidity used by physicians either at patients’ homes or in hospitals. A questionnaire survey was conducted to understand the current approaches to older patients with multimorbidity. The questionnaire was sent to 3300 people, including 1650 geriatric specialists and 1650 primary care specialists, were enrolled. A four-point Likert-type scale was used to score the following items: diseases that cause difficulties in treatment (diseases), patient backgrounds that cause difficulties in treatment (backgrounds), important clinical factors, and important clinical strategies. We used the Tukey–Kramer test to examine the differences between scores across 3 groups: physicians providing only home care (the “home” group), physicians providing only inpatient care (the “hospital” group), and physicians providing both home care and inpatient care (the “home and hospital” group). Out of 836 valid responses, those from 587 physicians were included in the analysis. The overall score for diseases was significantly higher in the “hospital” group than in either the “home” or “home and hospital” groups. The overall score for important clinical strategies was significantly higher in the “home and hospital” group than in the “hospital” group. In conclusion, physicians’ approaches to treating older people with multimorbidity may vary by practice setting, and particularly whether they provide care only to patients at home or in hospital or to both. To improve the quality of transition of care between hospital and home, a support system that considers differences in physician practice should be developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home Health Care Management & Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home Health Care Management & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223241241822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223241241822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日本,医生在患者家中或医院为患有多种疾病的老年患者提供医疗护理的方法鲜为人知。为了了解目前对患有多种疾病的老年患者的治疗方法,我们进行了一项问卷调查。调查问卷共发送给 3300 人,其中包括 1650 名老年病学专家和 1650 名初级保健专家。采用李克特四点量表对以下项目进行评分:导致治疗困难的疾病(疾病)、导致治疗困难的患者背景(背景)、重要临床因素和重要临床策略。我们使用Tukey-Kramer检验法检验了3个组别得分之间的差异:仅提供家庭护理的医生("家庭 "组)、仅提供住院护理的医生("医院 "组)以及同时提供家庭护理和住院护理的医生("家庭和医院 "组)。在 836 份有效答卷中,有 587 名医生的答卷被纳入分析。医院 "组的疾病总分明显高于 "家庭 "或 "家庭和医院 "组。在重要临床策略方面,"家庭和医院 "组的总分明显高于 "医院 "组。总之,医生对患有多病的老年人的治疗方法可能因执业环境而异,尤其是医生是否只为居家或住院患者提供护理服务,或同时为这两种患者提供护理服务。为了提高医院和家庭之间的护理过渡质量,应建立一个考虑到医生实践差异的支持系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship Between Physicians’ Engagement in Home Medical Care, Inpatient Care or Both, and Their Approach to Caring for Older Patients With Multimorbidity in Japan
In Japan, little is known about the approaches to medical care for older patients with multimorbidity used by physicians either at patients’ homes or in hospitals. A questionnaire survey was conducted to understand the current approaches to older patients with multimorbidity. The questionnaire was sent to 3300 people, including 1650 geriatric specialists and 1650 primary care specialists, were enrolled. A four-point Likert-type scale was used to score the following items: diseases that cause difficulties in treatment (diseases), patient backgrounds that cause difficulties in treatment (backgrounds), important clinical factors, and important clinical strategies. We used the Tukey–Kramer test to examine the differences between scores across 3 groups: physicians providing only home care (the “home” group), physicians providing only inpatient care (the “hospital” group), and physicians providing both home care and inpatient care (the “home and hospital” group). Out of 836 valid responses, those from 587 physicians were included in the analysis. The overall score for diseases was significantly higher in the “hospital” group than in either the “home” or “home and hospital” groups. The overall score for important clinical strategies was significantly higher in the “home and hospital” group than in the “hospital” group. In conclusion, physicians’ approaches to treating older people with multimorbidity may vary by practice setting, and particularly whether they provide care only to patients at home or in hospital or to both. To improve the quality of transition of care between hospital and home, a support system that considers differences in physician practice should be developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Interpersonal Continuity of Care in Home Health Physical Therapy to Reduce Hospital Readmissions Ensuring Safe Medication Assessment for Older Adults: A Pilot Study Enhancing Physical Activity Recommendations to Support Cognition in Homecare: A Quality Improvement Project Predicting Hospitalization Risk Among Home Care Residents in the United Kingdom: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model Coconstructing a Flexible At-Home Respite Model For and With Caregivers of Older Adults: A Living Lab Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1