用卢万算法和莱顿算法识别具有模块化度量的群落

IF 0.6 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.47836/pjst.32.3.16
Siti Haryanti Hairol Anuar, Zuraida Abal Abas, Norhazwani Md Yunos, M. Mukhtar, Tedy Setiadi, A. S. Shibghatullah
{"title":"用卢万算法和莱顿算法识别具有模块化度量的群落","authors":"Siti Haryanti Hairol Anuar, Zuraida Abal Abas, Norhazwani Md Yunos, M. Mukhtar, Tedy Setiadi, A. S. Shibghatullah","doi":"10.47836/pjst.32.3.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant increase in publication in complex network analysis research, especially in community detection. Many methods were proposed to identify community structure. Each community identification algorithm has strengths and weaknesses due to the complexity of information. Among them, the optimisation methods are widely focused on. This paper focuses on an empirical study of two community detection algorithms based on agglomerative techniques using modularity metric: Louvain and Leiden. In this regard, the Louvain algorithm has been shown to produce a bad connection in the community and disconnected when executed iteratively. Therefore, the Leiden algorithm is designed to successively resolve the weaknesses. Performance comparisons between the two and their concept were summarised in detail, as well as the step-by-step learning process of the state-of-the-art algorithms. This study is important and beneficial to the future study of interdisciplinary data sciences of network analysis. First, it demonstrates that the Leiden method outperformed the Louvain algorithm in terms of modularity metric and running time. Second, the paper displays the use of these two algorithms on synthetic and real networks. The experiment was successful as it identified better performance, and future work is required to confirm and validate these findings.","PeriodicalId":46234,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Communities with Modularity Metric Using Louvain and Leiden Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Siti Haryanti Hairol Anuar, Zuraida Abal Abas, Norhazwani Md Yunos, M. Mukhtar, Tedy Setiadi, A. S. Shibghatullah\",\"doi\":\"10.47836/pjst.32.3.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant increase in publication in complex network analysis research, especially in community detection. Many methods were proposed to identify community structure. Each community identification algorithm has strengths and weaknesses due to the complexity of information. Among them, the optimisation methods are widely focused on. This paper focuses on an empirical study of two community detection algorithms based on agglomerative techniques using modularity metric: Louvain and Leiden. In this regard, the Louvain algorithm has been shown to produce a bad connection in the community and disconnected when executed iteratively. Therefore, the Leiden algorithm is designed to successively resolve the weaknesses. Performance comparisons between the two and their concept were summarised in detail, as well as the step-by-step learning process of the state-of-the-art algorithms. This study is important and beneficial to the future study of interdisciplinary data sciences of network analysis. First, it demonstrates that the Leiden method outperformed the Louvain algorithm in terms of modularity metric and running time. Second, the paper displays the use of these two algorithms on synthetic and real networks. The experiment was successful as it identified better performance, and future work is required to confirm and validate these findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.32.3.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.32.3.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的 20 年里,复杂网络分析研究,尤其是群落检测方面的研究成果大幅增加。人们提出了许多识别群落结构的方法。由于信息的复杂性,每种群落识别算法都有其优缺点。其中,优化方法受到广泛关注。本文重点对两种基于聚类技术、使用模块化度量的社群检测算法进行了实证研究:卢万算法和莱顿算法。在这方面,卢万算法已被证明会在社区中产生不良连接,并在迭代执行时断开连接。因此,莱顿算法旨在连续解决这些弱点。研究人员详细总结了这两种算法的性能比较及其概念,以及最先进算法的逐步学习过程。这项研究对未来网络分析跨学科数据科学的研究具有重要意义和益处。首先,它证明了莱顿方法在模块化度量和运行时间方面优于卢万算法。其次,论文展示了这两种算法在合成网络和真实网络中的应用。实验取得了成功,因为它发现了更好的性能,而未来的工作则需要证实和验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Communities with Modularity Metric Using Louvain and Leiden Algorithms
Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant increase in publication in complex network analysis research, especially in community detection. Many methods were proposed to identify community structure. Each community identification algorithm has strengths and weaknesses due to the complexity of information. Among them, the optimisation methods are widely focused on. This paper focuses on an empirical study of two community detection algorithms based on agglomerative techniques using modularity metric: Louvain and Leiden. In this regard, the Louvain algorithm has been shown to produce a bad connection in the community and disconnected when executed iteratively. Therefore, the Leiden algorithm is designed to successively resolve the weaknesses. Performance comparisons between the two and their concept were summarised in detail, as well as the step-by-step learning process of the state-of-the-art algorithms. This study is important and beneficial to the future study of interdisciplinary data sciences of network analysis. First, it demonstrates that the Leiden method outperformed the Louvain algorithm in terms of modularity metric and running time. Second, the paper displays the use of these two algorithms on synthetic and real networks. The experiment was successful as it identified better performance, and future work is required to confirm and validate these findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology aims to provide a forum for high quality research related to science and engineering research. Areas relevant to the scope of the journal include: bioinformatics, bioscience, biotechnology and bio-molecular sciences, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, engineering design, environmental control and management, mathematics and statistics, medicine and health sciences, nanotechnology, physics, safety and emergency management, and related fields of study.
期刊最新文献
A Review on the Development of Microcarriers for Cell Culture Applications The Compatibility of Cement Bonded Fibreboard Through Dimensional Stability Analysis: A Review Bending Effects on Polyvinyl Alcohol Thin Film for Flexible Wearable Antenna Substrate Mesh Optimisation for General 3D Printed Objects with Cusp-Height Triangulation Approach The Riblet Short-Slot Coupler Using Substrate Integrated Waveguide (SIW) for High-frequency Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1