Johannes Birtel, Maximilian Hammer, Nicolas Feltgen, Laurenz Pauleikhoff, Ariel Yuhan Ong, Gerd Geerling, Martin S Spitzer, Peter Charbel Issa
{"title":"玻璃体内注射:减少临床浪费,提高可持续性。","authors":"Johannes Birtel, Maximilian Hammer, Nicolas Feltgen, Laurenz Pauleikhoff, Ariel Yuhan Ong, Gerd Geerling, Martin S Spitzer, Peter Charbel Issa","doi":"10.1055/a-2184-9492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nIntravitreal injections are one of the most commonly performed procedures in ophthalmology. It is estimated that over 1 million intravitreal injections are performed in Germany annually. The aim of this study was to quantify the waste and carbon footprint associated with single-use injection sets, and to establish a waste reduction strategy.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nThe clinical waste and associated carbon footprint from standard disposable injection sets used by tertiary referral centres in Germany (n = 6) and the United Kingdom (n = 2) were assessed. The safety of performing intravitreal injections with a minimalistic material-sparing approach was evaluated.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe average weight of an injection set (and hence the waste generated from each injection) was 165 g. On average, each injection set comprised 145 g (88%) of plastic, 2.1 g (1.3%) of metal, 4.3 g (2.6%) of paper), and 12.9 g (7.8%) of gauze/swabs. For 1 million injections, this equates to 145.2 tonnes (t) of plastic, 2.1 t of metal, 4.3 t of paper, and 12.9 t of gauze/swabs. A material-sparing approach can reduce injection set-associated waste by 99% without necessarily compromising safety.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nA resource-saving approach to intravitreal injections can minimise the generation of clinical waste and its associated carbon footprint, thereby supporting sustainability.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravitreal Injections: Improving Sustainability by Reducing Clinical Waste.\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Birtel, Maximilian Hammer, Nicolas Feltgen, Laurenz Pauleikhoff, Ariel Yuhan Ong, Gerd Geerling, Martin S Spitzer, Peter Charbel Issa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2184-9492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nIntravitreal injections are one of the most commonly performed procedures in ophthalmology. It is estimated that over 1 million intravitreal injections are performed in Germany annually. The aim of this study was to quantify the waste and carbon footprint associated with single-use injection sets, and to establish a waste reduction strategy.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nThe clinical waste and associated carbon footprint from standard disposable injection sets used by tertiary referral centres in Germany (n = 6) and the United Kingdom (n = 2) were assessed. The safety of performing intravitreal injections with a minimalistic material-sparing approach was evaluated.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe average weight of an injection set (and hence the waste generated from each injection) was 165 g. On average, each injection set comprised 145 g (88%) of plastic, 2.1 g (1.3%) of metal, 4.3 g (2.6%) of paper), and 12.9 g (7.8%) of gauze/swabs. For 1 million injections, this equates to 145.2 tonnes (t) of plastic, 2.1 t of metal, 4.3 t of paper, and 12.9 t of gauze/swabs. A material-sparing approach can reduce injection set-associated waste by 99% without necessarily compromising safety.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nA resource-saving approach to intravitreal injections can minimise the generation of clinical waste and its associated carbon footprint, thereby supporting sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2184-9492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2184-9492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intravitreal Injections: Improving Sustainability by Reducing Clinical Waste.
BACKGROUND
Intravitreal injections are one of the most commonly performed procedures in ophthalmology. It is estimated that over 1 million intravitreal injections are performed in Germany annually. The aim of this study was to quantify the waste and carbon footprint associated with single-use injection sets, and to establish a waste reduction strategy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The clinical waste and associated carbon footprint from standard disposable injection sets used by tertiary referral centres in Germany (n = 6) and the United Kingdom (n = 2) were assessed. The safety of performing intravitreal injections with a minimalistic material-sparing approach was evaluated.
RESULTS
The average weight of an injection set (and hence the waste generated from each injection) was 165 g. On average, each injection set comprised 145 g (88%) of plastic, 2.1 g (1.3%) of metal, 4.3 g (2.6%) of paper), and 12.9 g (7.8%) of gauze/swabs. For 1 million injections, this equates to 145.2 tonnes (t) of plastic, 2.1 t of metal, 4.3 t of paper, and 12.9 t of gauze/swabs. A material-sparing approach can reduce injection set-associated waste by 99% without necessarily compromising safety.
CONCLUSION
A resource-saving approach to intravitreal injections can minimise the generation of clinical waste and its associated carbon footprint, thereby supporting sustainability.