在腹股沟疝气开放式修补术中,使用手术过程管理器规范操作步骤并监控外科医生的表现

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY Surgical Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1111/1744-1633.12686
Yue Sun Cheung, Hon Ting Lok, Andrew Kai Yip Fung, Paul Bo San Lai
{"title":"在腹股沟疝气开放式修补术中,使用手术过程管理器规范操作步骤并监控外科医生的表现","authors":"Yue Sun Cheung,&nbsp;Hon Ting Lok,&nbsp;Andrew Kai Yip Fung,&nbsp;Paul Bo San Lai","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.12686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To study the feasibility of using surgical procedure manager (SPM), a digital checklist platform, to standardise surgical steps of open hernia repair and monitor the operative performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methodology</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective study on all open mesh repair of inguinal hernia under local anaesthesia from September 2019 to November 2021 at the Prince of Wales Hospital was performed. The operative outcomes of patients having operations with or without the use of SPM were compared. Procedures using SPM had operation steps shown as a digital checklist inside the theatre. The time used for each surgical step was recorded and analysed. The operative performance of the surgeons was analysed by observing the trend of the mean operation time over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 123 patients were recruited, of which 52 were using the SPM. The median age of patients was 75 (range 49–93) years. A decreasing trend in the mean operation time for dissection, mesh placement, wound closure and total operation time was observed in surgeries using SPM. There was no significant difference in the operation time, theatre time, total length of stay, blood loss and readmission rate between the SPM and non-SPM groups. The proportion of basic surgical trainees as coached surgeons in the SPM group was significantly higher (SPM = 52% vs non-SPM = 28%, <i>P</i> = .07).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of SPM did not significantly prolong the operation time and produce comparable operative outcomes in open hernia repair. It provided the additional advantage of standardising operation steps and monitoring the performance of surgical trainees during their training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"28 3","pages":"139-143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of surgical procedure manager to standardise operation steps and monitor surgeon performance in open repair of inguinal hernia\",\"authors\":\"Yue Sun Cheung,&nbsp;Hon Ting Lok,&nbsp;Andrew Kai Yip Fung,&nbsp;Paul Bo San Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-1633.12686\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To study the feasibility of using surgical procedure manager (SPM), a digital checklist platform, to standardise surgical steps of open hernia repair and monitor the operative performance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methodology</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective study on all open mesh repair of inguinal hernia under local anaesthesia from September 2019 to November 2021 at the Prince of Wales Hospital was performed. The operative outcomes of patients having operations with or without the use of SPM were compared. Procedures using SPM had operation steps shown as a digital checklist inside the theatre. The time used for each surgical step was recorded and analysed. The operative performance of the surgeons was analysed by observing the trend of the mean operation time over time.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 123 patients were recruited, of which 52 were using the SPM. The median age of patients was 75 (range 49–93) years. A decreasing trend in the mean operation time for dissection, mesh placement, wound closure and total operation time was observed in surgeries using SPM. There was no significant difference in the operation time, theatre time, total length of stay, blood loss and readmission rate between the SPM and non-SPM groups. The proportion of basic surgical trainees as coached surgeons in the SPM group was significantly higher (SPM = 52% vs non-SPM = 28%, <i>P</i> = .07).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The use of SPM did not significantly prolong the operation time and produce comparable operative outcomes in open hernia repair. It provided the additional advantage of standardising operation steps and monitoring the performance of surgical trainees during their training.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"139-143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12686\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.12686","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

威尔士亲王医院对2019年9月至2021年11月期间在局部麻醉下进行的所有腹股沟疝开放式网片修补术进行了回顾性研究。对使用或未使用 SPM 的患者的手术结果进行了比较。使用SPM的手术在手术室内以数字核对表的形式显示手术步骤。每个手术步骤所用的时间都被记录下来并进行分析。通过观察平均手术时间随时间变化的趋势,分析外科医生的手术表现。共招募了 123 名患者,其中 52 人使用了 SPM。患者的中位年龄为 75 岁(49-93 岁)。在使用 SPM 的手术中,解剖、放置网片、伤口缝合和总手术时间的平均手术时间呈下降趋势。SPM 组和非 SPM 组在手术时间、手术室时间、总住院时间、失血量和再入院率方面没有明显差异。SPM组中担任指导外科医生的基础外科学员比例明显更高(SPM = 52% vs non-SPM = 28%,P = .07)。使用 SPM 并没有明显延长手术时间,手术效果与开腹疝修补术相当。它的另一个优点是规范了手术步骤,并能在外科学员培训期间对其表现进行监控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of surgical procedure manager to standardise operation steps and monitor surgeon performance in open repair of inguinal hernia

Objectives

To study the feasibility of using surgical procedure manager (SPM), a digital checklist platform, to standardise surgical steps of open hernia repair and monitor the operative performance.

Methodology

A retrospective study on all open mesh repair of inguinal hernia under local anaesthesia from September 2019 to November 2021 at the Prince of Wales Hospital was performed. The operative outcomes of patients having operations with or without the use of SPM were compared. Procedures using SPM had operation steps shown as a digital checklist inside the theatre. The time used for each surgical step was recorded and analysed. The operative performance of the surgeons was analysed by observing the trend of the mean operation time over time.

Results

A total of 123 patients were recruited, of which 52 were using the SPM. The median age of patients was 75 (range 49–93) years. A decreasing trend in the mean operation time for dissection, mesh placement, wound closure and total operation time was observed in surgeries using SPM. There was no significant difference in the operation time, theatre time, total length of stay, blood loss and readmission rate between the SPM and non-SPM groups. The proportion of basic surgical trainees as coached surgeons in the SPM group was significantly higher (SPM = 52% vs non-SPM = 28%, P = .07).

Conclusions

The use of SPM did not significantly prolong the operation time and produce comparable operative outcomes in open hernia repair. It provided the additional advantage of standardising operation steps and monitoring the performance of surgical trainees during their training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Practice
Surgical Practice 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Author Index Full Oral Short oral Motion picture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1