全纳教育自我效能感的预测因素:加拿大与德国的比较

Q4 Social Sciences Exceptionality Education International Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.5206/eei.v34i1.16920
Jacqueline Specht, Susanne Miesera, Jamie Metsala, Donna McGhie-Richmond
{"title":"全纳教育自我效能感的预测因素:加拿大与德国的比较","authors":"Jacqueline Specht, Susanne Miesera, Jamie Metsala, Donna McGhie-Richmond","doi":"10.5206/eei.v34i1.16920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated group and individual differences in beginning secondary school teachers’ self-efficacy for the inclusive classroom in Canada and Germany. This research complements previous Canadian and German research that compared the self-efficacy of pre-service teachers in each country, as well as those experiences that contributed to their self-efficacy. In the current study, 110 Canadian and 90 German beginning teachers completed the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice scale and the Beliefs About Learning and Teaching Questionnaire and described their experience with diverse populations. As a group, Canadian teachers were higher in their self-efficacy for implementing inclusive instruction and for engaging in collaboration with families and colleagues. The groups did not differ on self-efficacy for managing behaviour, though males felt more efficacious than females. Overall, country accounted for 18% and 11% of the variance in self-efficacy for inclusive instruction and for collaboration, respectively. Additional individual differences in self-efficacy for instruction and for managing behaviour were accounted for by participants’ experiences with diverse populations. Finally, participants’ beliefs that aligned with student-centred approaches accounted for unique variance in self-efficacy for inclusive instruction and collaboration. Results are discussed in the context of prior research and possible considerations for teacher education programs.","PeriodicalId":38584,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality Education International","volume":"253 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Education: A Comparison of Canada and Germany\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Specht, Susanne Miesera, Jamie Metsala, Donna McGhie-Richmond\",\"doi\":\"10.5206/eei.v34i1.16920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigated group and individual differences in beginning secondary school teachers’ self-efficacy for the inclusive classroom in Canada and Germany. This research complements previous Canadian and German research that compared the self-efficacy of pre-service teachers in each country, as well as those experiences that contributed to their self-efficacy. In the current study, 110 Canadian and 90 German beginning teachers completed the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice scale and the Beliefs About Learning and Teaching Questionnaire and described their experience with diverse populations. As a group, Canadian teachers were higher in their self-efficacy for implementing inclusive instruction and for engaging in collaboration with families and colleagues. The groups did not differ on self-efficacy for managing behaviour, though males felt more efficacious than females. Overall, country accounted for 18% and 11% of the variance in self-efficacy for inclusive instruction and for collaboration, respectively. Additional individual differences in self-efficacy for instruction and for managing behaviour were accounted for by participants’ experiences with diverse populations. Finally, participants’ beliefs that aligned with student-centred approaches accounted for unique variance in self-efficacy for inclusive instruction and collaboration. Results are discussed in the context of prior research and possible considerations for teacher education programs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality Education International\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality Education International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v34i1.16920\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v34i1.16920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了加拿大和德国初任中学教师对全纳课堂的自我效能感的群体和个体差异。这项研究是对加拿大和德国以往研究的补充,这些研究比较了两国职前教师的自我效能感,以及那些有助于提高其自我效能感的经历。在本次研究中,110 名加拿大和 90 名德国职前教师完成了全纳实践教师效能感量表和学习与教学信念问卷,并描述了他们与不同人群打交道的经历。作为一个群体,加拿大教师在实施全纳教学以及与家庭和同事合作方面的自我效能感较高。两组教师在行为管理的自我效能感方面没有差异,但男性比女性更有效能感。总体而言,国家分别占全纳教学自我效能感和合作自我效能感差异的 18% 和 11%。学员在教学和行为管理方面的自我效能感的其他个体差异,是由学员与不同人群打交道的经历所决定的。最后,参与者的信念与以学生为中心的教学方法相一致,这也是全纳教学和协作自我效能感的独特差异所在。本文结合先前的研究和师范教育计划可能考虑的因素,对研究结果进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictors of Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Education: A Comparison of Canada and Germany
This study investigated group and individual differences in beginning secondary school teachers’ self-efficacy for the inclusive classroom in Canada and Germany. This research complements previous Canadian and German research that compared the self-efficacy of pre-service teachers in each country, as well as those experiences that contributed to their self-efficacy. In the current study, 110 Canadian and 90 German beginning teachers completed the Teacher Efficacy for Inclusive Practice scale and the Beliefs About Learning and Teaching Questionnaire and described their experience with diverse populations. As a group, Canadian teachers were higher in their self-efficacy for implementing inclusive instruction and for engaging in collaboration with families and colleagues. The groups did not differ on self-efficacy for managing behaviour, though males felt more efficacious than females. Overall, country accounted for 18% and 11% of the variance in self-efficacy for inclusive instruction and for collaboration, respectively. Additional individual differences in self-efficacy for instruction and for managing behaviour were accounted for by participants’ experiences with diverse populations. Finally, participants’ beliefs that aligned with student-centred approaches accounted for unique variance in self-efficacy for inclusive instruction and collaboration. Results are discussed in the context of prior research and possible considerations for teacher education programs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality Education International
Exceptionality Education International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“We Need Structures in Place”: Educators’ Experiences With Special Education at International Schools Whereto From Here? A Discussion Among International Scholars of Inclusive Education Inclusive Change in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: A Collaborative Autoethnography Predictors of Self-Efficacy for Inclusive Education: A Comparison of Canada and Germany How Do Attitudes and Self-Efficacy Predict Teachers’ Intentions to Use Inclusive Practices? A Cross-National Comparison Between Canada, Germany, Greece, Italy, and Switzerland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1