新生儿早发性败血症计算器实施前后妊娠≥35 周、母亲患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的新生儿的抗生素治疗。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.2005
Surichhya Bajracharya, P. Prazad, Catherine Bennett, Nahren Asado
{"title":"新生儿早发性败血症计算器实施前后妊娠≥35 周、母亲患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的新生儿的抗生素治疗。","authors":"Surichhya Bajracharya, P. Prazad, Catherine Bennett, Nahren Asado","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.2005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nOur quality improvement study aimed to determine whether application of a neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator (NSC) among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis decreases the number of lab evaluations (LEs) and antibiotic treatments (Abxs) without missing early-onset sepsis.\n\n\nMethods\nWe compared 2 years (January 1, 2019-January 3, 2021) of data from a historical-control group before implementation of the NSC to 1 year (January 4, 2021-December 31, 2021) of data from a calculator group after implementation of the NSC to evaluate whether LE and Abx decreased following implementation of the NSC on January 4, 2021. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test used for the analyses.\n\n\nResults\nIn the historical-control group, 94% of infants received LE and Abx. Retrospective application of the NSC in the historical-control group decreased LE from 94% to 21% and Abx from 94% to 13%. In the calculator group, 14% and 5% of infants received LE and Abx, respectively, and none of the blood culture was positive. Median time from birth to antibiotic initiation was significantly longer (14.5 vs 3.8 hours; P=0.0037) with no increase in median length of stay (2.3 vs 2.4 days; P=0.02) after NSC implementation. No significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission was identified between groups (4% vs 1%; P=0.15).\n\n\nConclusions\nThere was a significant decrease in LE and Abx among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis after implementation of the NSC without missing early-onset sepsis. There was no increase in neonatal intensive care unit admission or length of hospital stay in infants who received antibiotics later after they appeared equivocal or clinically ill in the calculator group. Larger prospective studies that include follow ups are needed to confirm that early-onset sepsis is not missed.","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Treatment for Well-Appearing Infants Born at ≥35 Weeks' Gestation to Mothers with Chorioamnionitis Before and After Implementation of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator.\",\"authors\":\"Surichhya Bajracharya, P. Prazad, Catherine Bennett, Nahren Asado\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.2005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nOur quality improvement study aimed to determine whether application of a neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator (NSC) among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis decreases the number of lab evaluations (LEs) and antibiotic treatments (Abxs) without missing early-onset sepsis.\\n\\n\\nMethods\\nWe compared 2 years (January 1, 2019-January 3, 2021) of data from a historical-control group before implementation of the NSC to 1 year (January 4, 2021-December 31, 2021) of data from a calculator group after implementation of the NSC to evaluate whether LE and Abx decreased following implementation of the NSC on January 4, 2021. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test used for the analyses.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nIn the historical-control group, 94% of infants received LE and Abx. Retrospective application of the NSC in the historical-control group decreased LE from 94% to 21% and Abx from 94% to 13%. In the calculator group, 14% and 5% of infants received LE and Abx, respectively, and none of the blood culture was positive. Median time from birth to antibiotic initiation was significantly longer (14.5 vs 3.8 hours; P=0.0037) with no increase in median length of stay (2.3 vs 2.4 days; P=0.02) after NSC implementation. No significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission was identified between groups (4% vs 1%; P=0.15).\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nThere was a significant decrease in LE and Abx among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis after implementation of the NSC without missing early-onset sepsis. There was no increase in neonatal intensive care unit admission or length of hospital stay in infants who received antibiotics later after they appeared equivocal or clinically ill in the calculator group. Larger prospective studies that include follow ups are needed to confirm that early-onset sepsis is not missed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.2005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们的质量改进研究旨在确定在妊娠≥35周、母亲患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的新生儿中应用新生儿早发败血症计算器(NSC)是否会在不遗漏早发败血症的情况下减少实验室评估(LE)和抗生素治疗(Abxs)的次数。方法我们比较了 NSC 实施前历史对照组的 2 年(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 1 月 3 日)数据和 NSC 实施后计算器组的 1 年(2021 年 1 月 4 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日)数据,以评估 2021 年 1 月 4 日 NSC 实施后 LE 和 Abx 是否减少。在用于分析的卡方检验、费雪精确检验、学生 t 检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验中,P 值小于 0.05 即为具有统计学意义。在历史对照组中回顾性应用 NSC 后,LE 从 94% 降至 21%,Abx 从 94% 降至 13%。在计算器组中,分别有14%和5%的婴儿接受了LE和Abx治疗,且无一例血培养呈阳性。实施 NSC 后,婴儿从出生到开始使用抗生素的中位时间明显延长(14.5 小时 vs 3.8 小时;P=0.0037),而中位住院时间没有增加(2.3 天 vs 2.4 天;P=0.02)。结论在实施 NSC 后,妊娠≥35 周、母亲患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的新生儿的 LE 和 Abx 明显减少,但没有漏掉早发败血症。在计算器组中,婴儿出现症状不明显或临床病症后再接受抗生素治疗的,新生儿重症监护病房的入院率和住院时间都没有增加。需要进行包括随访在内的更大规模的前瞻性研究,以确认早期败血症没有被遗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic Treatment for Well-Appearing Infants Born at ≥35 Weeks' Gestation to Mothers with Chorioamnionitis Before and After Implementation of Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator.
Purpose Our quality improvement study aimed to determine whether application of a neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator (NSC) among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis decreases the number of lab evaluations (LEs) and antibiotic treatments (Abxs) without missing early-onset sepsis. Methods We compared 2 years (January 1, 2019-January 3, 2021) of data from a historical-control group before implementation of the NSC to 1 year (January 4, 2021-December 31, 2021) of data from a calculator group after implementation of the NSC to evaluate whether LE and Abx decreased following implementation of the NSC on January 4, 2021. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U test used for the analyses. Results In the historical-control group, 94% of infants received LE and Abx. Retrospective application of the NSC in the historical-control group decreased LE from 94% to 21% and Abx from 94% to 13%. In the calculator group, 14% and 5% of infants received LE and Abx, respectively, and none of the blood culture was positive. Median time from birth to antibiotic initiation was significantly longer (14.5 vs 3.8 hours; P=0.0037) with no increase in median length of stay (2.3 vs 2.4 days; P=0.02) after NSC implementation. No significant difference in neonatal intensive care unit admission was identified between groups (4% vs 1%; P=0.15). Conclusions There was a significant decrease in LE and Abx among well-appearing infants born at ≥35 weeks' gestation to mothers with chorioamnionitis after implementation of the NSC without missing early-onset sepsis. There was no increase in neonatal intensive care unit admission or length of hospital stay in infants who received antibiotics later after they appeared equivocal or clinically ill in the calculator group. Larger prospective studies that include follow ups are needed to confirm that early-onset sepsis is not missed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bringing Virtual Reality to Mainstream Pediatric Care Recognizing 30 Years of Accomplishments and Envisioning an Innovative Future - The 2024 Annual Conference of the Health Care Systems Research Network Abstracts From the 2024 Health Care Systems Research Network (HCSRN) Annual Conference, Milwaukee, Wisconsin Cruising Speed: Our Journal's 10-Year Voyage Factors Associated With Increased Health Care Utilization for Patients With Dementia With Lewy Bodies: A Narrative Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1