层间多孔介质重力流:分散和分布式排水的影响

S. Sheikhi, M. R. Flynn
{"title":"层间多孔介质重力流:分散和分布式排水的影响","authors":"S. Sheikhi, M. R. Flynn","doi":"10.1017/jfm.2024.203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by buoyancy-driven flows within geological formations, we study the evolution of a (dense) gravity current in a porous medium bisected by a thin interbed layer. The gravity current experiences distributed drainage along this low-permeability boundary. Our theoretical description of this flow takes into account dispersive mass exchange with the surrounding ambient fluid by considering the evolution of the bulk and dispersed phases of the gravity current. In turn, we model basal draining by considering two bookend limits, i.e. no mixing versus perfect mixing in the lower layer. Our formulations are assessed by comparing model predictions against the output of complementary numerical simulations run using COMSOL. Numerical output is essential both for determining the value of the entrainment coefficient used within our theory and for assessing the reasonableness of key modelling assumptions. Our results suggest that the degree of dispersion depends on the dip angle and the depth and permeability of the interbed layer. We further find that the nose position predictions made by our theoretical models are reasonably accurate up to the point where the no mixing model predicts a retraction of the gravity current front. Thereafter, the no mixing model significantly under-predicts, and the perfect mixing model moderately over-predicts, numerical data. Reasons for the failure of the no mixing model are provided, highlighting the importance of convective instabilities in the lower layer. A regime diagram is presented that defines the parametric region where our theoretical models do versus do not yield predictions in good agreement with numerical simulations.","PeriodicalId":505053,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","volume":"184 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Porous media gravity current flow over an interbed layer: the impact of dispersion and distributed drainage\",\"authors\":\"S. Sheikhi, M. R. Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jfm.2024.203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Motivated by buoyancy-driven flows within geological formations, we study the evolution of a (dense) gravity current in a porous medium bisected by a thin interbed layer. The gravity current experiences distributed drainage along this low-permeability boundary. Our theoretical description of this flow takes into account dispersive mass exchange with the surrounding ambient fluid by considering the evolution of the bulk and dispersed phases of the gravity current. In turn, we model basal draining by considering two bookend limits, i.e. no mixing versus perfect mixing in the lower layer. Our formulations are assessed by comparing model predictions against the output of complementary numerical simulations run using COMSOL. Numerical output is essential both for determining the value of the entrainment coefficient used within our theory and for assessing the reasonableness of key modelling assumptions. Our results suggest that the degree of dispersion depends on the dip angle and the depth and permeability of the interbed layer. We further find that the nose position predictions made by our theoretical models are reasonably accurate up to the point where the no mixing model predicts a retraction of the gravity current front. Thereafter, the no mixing model significantly under-predicts, and the perfect mixing model moderately over-predicts, numerical data. Reasons for the failure of the no mixing model are provided, highlighting the importance of convective instabilities in the lower layer. A regime diagram is presented that defines the parametric region where our theoretical models do versus do not yield predictions in good agreement with numerical simulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluid Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"184 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluid Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluid Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2024.203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

受地质构造中的浮力驱动流的启发,我们研究了多孔介质中被薄夹层一分为二的(致密)重力流的演变。重力流沿低渗透边界经历分布式排水。我们对这种流动的理论描述通过考虑重力流的体相和分散相的演变,考虑了与周围环境流体的分散质量交换。反过来,我们通过考虑两个极限(即下层无混合和完全混合)来建立基底排水模型。通过将模型预测结果与 COMSOL 数值模拟结果进行比较,对我们的计算方法进行了评估。数值模拟结果对于确定我们理论中使用的夹带系数值和评估关键建模假设的合理性至关重要。我们的结果表明,分散程度取决于倾角以及夹层的深度和渗透性。我们还发现,在无混合模型预测重力流前沿回缩之前,我们的理论模型对流鼻位置的预测是相当准确的。此后,无混合模型对数值数据的预测明显偏低,而完全混合模型对数值数据的预测则适度偏高。提供了无混合模式失败的原因,突出了下层对流不稳定性的重要性。提出了一个制度图,定义了我们的理论模型与数值模拟预测结果不一致的参数区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Porous media gravity current flow over an interbed layer: the impact of dispersion and distributed drainage
Motivated by buoyancy-driven flows within geological formations, we study the evolution of a (dense) gravity current in a porous medium bisected by a thin interbed layer. The gravity current experiences distributed drainage along this low-permeability boundary. Our theoretical description of this flow takes into account dispersive mass exchange with the surrounding ambient fluid by considering the evolution of the bulk and dispersed phases of the gravity current. In turn, we model basal draining by considering two bookend limits, i.e. no mixing versus perfect mixing in the lower layer. Our formulations are assessed by comparing model predictions against the output of complementary numerical simulations run using COMSOL. Numerical output is essential both for determining the value of the entrainment coefficient used within our theory and for assessing the reasonableness of key modelling assumptions. Our results suggest that the degree of dispersion depends on the dip angle and the depth and permeability of the interbed layer. We further find that the nose position predictions made by our theoretical models are reasonably accurate up to the point where the no mixing model predicts a retraction of the gravity current front. Thereafter, the no mixing model significantly under-predicts, and the perfect mixing model moderately over-predicts, numerical data. Reasons for the failure of the no mixing model are provided, highlighting the importance of convective instabilities in the lower layer. A regime diagram is presented that defines the parametric region where our theoretical models do versus do not yield predictions in good agreement with numerical simulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vortex shedding behind porous flat plates normal to the flow Adjoint-accelerated Bayesian inference applied to the thermoacoustic behaviour of a ducted conical flame Heavy tails and probability density functions to any nonlinear order for the surface elevation in irregular seas Air-blast atomization of a liquid film The effect of permeability on the flow structure of porous square cylinders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1