肌肉密度(而非大小)与髋部骨折老年人的认知健康独立相关

IF 3.4 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM JBMR Plus Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae047
Y. Ge, Qian You, Feng Gao, Gang Liu, Ling Wang, Bo Li, M. Tian, Minghui Yang, Xinbao Wu
{"title":"肌肉密度(而非大小)与髋部骨折老年人的认知健康独立相关","authors":"Y. Ge, Qian You, Feng Gao, Gang Liu, Ling Wang, Bo Li, M. Tian, Minghui Yang, Xinbao Wu","doi":"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Emerging evidence indicates a complex interplay between skeletal muscle and cognitive function. Despite the known differences between muscle quantity and quality, which can be measured via computed tomography (CT), the precise nature of their associations with cognitive performance remain underexplored. To investigate the links between muscle size and density and cognitive impairment (CI) in the older adults with hip fractures, we conducted a post hoc, cross-sectional analysis within a prospective cohort study on 679 patients with hip fractures over 65. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and routine hip CT imaging were utilized to assess cognition function and muscle characteristics in older adults with hip fractures. The CT scans provided data on cross-sectional area and attenuation for the gluteus maximus (G.MaxM) and the combined gluteus medius and minimus (G.Med/MinM). Participants were categorized into CI and non-CI groups based on education levels and MMSE scores. Multivariate logistic regressions, propensity score (PS) methods, and subgroup analysis were employed to analyze associations and validate findings. This study included 123 participants (81.6 ± 6.8 years, 74% female) with CI and 556 participants (78.5 ± 7.7 years, 72% female) without. Compared to the non-CI group, muscle parameters, especially density, were significantly lower in the CI group. Specifically, G.Med/Min muscle density, but not size was robustly associated with CI (odds ratio (OR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.62–0.96, P = 0.02), independent of other medical situations. Sensitivity analysis corroborated that G.Med/Min muscle density was consistently lower in the CI group than the non-CI group, as evidenced in the PS matched (P = 0.024) and weighted cohort (P = 0.033). Enhanced muscle parameters, particularly muscle density in the G.Med/MinM muscle, correlate with a lower risk of CI. Muscle density demonstrates a stronger association with cognitive performance than muscle size, highlighting its potential as a key focus in future cognitive health research.","PeriodicalId":14611,"journal":{"name":"JBMR Plus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle density, but not size, is independently associated with cognitive health in older adults with hip fractures\",\"authors\":\"Y. Ge, Qian You, Feng Gao, Gang Liu, Ling Wang, Bo Li, M. Tian, Minghui Yang, Xinbao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Emerging evidence indicates a complex interplay between skeletal muscle and cognitive function. Despite the known differences between muscle quantity and quality, which can be measured via computed tomography (CT), the precise nature of their associations with cognitive performance remain underexplored. To investigate the links between muscle size and density and cognitive impairment (CI) in the older adults with hip fractures, we conducted a post hoc, cross-sectional analysis within a prospective cohort study on 679 patients with hip fractures over 65. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and routine hip CT imaging were utilized to assess cognition function and muscle characteristics in older adults with hip fractures. The CT scans provided data on cross-sectional area and attenuation for the gluteus maximus (G.MaxM) and the combined gluteus medius and minimus (G.Med/MinM). Participants were categorized into CI and non-CI groups based on education levels and MMSE scores. Multivariate logistic regressions, propensity score (PS) methods, and subgroup analysis were employed to analyze associations and validate findings. This study included 123 participants (81.6 ± 6.8 years, 74% female) with CI and 556 participants (78.5 ± 7.7 years, 72% female) without. Compared to the non-CI group, muscle parameters, especially density, were significantly lower in the CI group. Specifically, G.Med/Min muscle density, but not size was robustly associated with CI (odds ratio (OR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.62–0.96, P = 0.02), independent of other medical situations. Sensitivity analysis corroborated that G.Med/Min muscle density was consistently lower in the CI group than the non-CI group, as evidenced in the PS matched (P = 0.024) and weighted cohort (P = 0.033). Enhanced muscle parameters, particularly muscle density in the G.Med/MinM muscle, correlate with a lower risk of CI. Muscle density demonstrates a stronger association with cognitive performance than muscle size, highlighting its potential as a key focus in future cognitive health research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBMR Plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBMR Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbmrpl/ziae047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 新的证据表明,骨骼肌与认知功能之间存在复杂的相互作用。尽管通过计算机断层扫描(CT)可以测量出肌肉数量和质量之间的已知差异,但它们与认知能力之间关系的确切性质仍未得到充分探讨。为了研究髋部骨折老年人的肌肉大小和密度与认知障碍(CI)之间的联系,我们在一项前瞻性队列研究中对 679 名 65 岁以上的髋部骨折患者进行了交叉分析。我们利用小型精神状态检查(MMSE)和常规髋部 CT 成像来评估髋部骨折老年人的认知功能和肌肉特征。CT 扫描提供了臀大肌(G.MaxM)以及臀中肌和臀小肌(G.Med/MinM)的横截面积和衰减数据。根据受教育程度和 MMSE 评分将参与者分为 CI 组和非 CI 组。研究采用多变量逻辑回归、倾向得分(PS)方法和亚组分析来分析相关性并验证研究结果。该研究包括 123 名 CI 患者(81.6 ± 6.8 岁,74% 为女性)和 556 名非 CI 患者(78.5 ± 7.7 岁,72% 为女性)。与非 CI 组相比,CI 组的肌肉参数(尤其是密度)明显较低。具体来说,G.Med/Min肌肉密度与CI密切相关(几率比(OR)=0.77,95%置信区间=0.62-0.96,P=0.02),但与体型无关,与其他医疗情况也无关。敏感性分析证实,CI 组的 G.Med/Min 肌肉密度一直低于非 CI 组,这一点在 PS 匹配组(P = 0.024)和加权组群(P = 0.033)中得到了证实。增强的肌肉参数,尤其是 G.Med/MinM 肌肉的肌肉密度,与较低的 CI 风险相关。肌肉密度与认知能力的关系比肌肉大小更密切,这表明肌肉密度有可能成为未来认知健康研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Muscle density, but not size, is independently associated with cognitive health in older adults with hip fractures
Abstract Emerging evidence indicates a complex interplay between skeletal muscle and cognitive function. Despite the known differences between muscle quantity and quality, which can be measured via computed tomography (CT), the precise nature of their associations with cognitive performance remain underexplored. To investigate the links between muscle size and density and cognitive impairment (CI) in the older adults with hip fractures, we conducted a post hoc, cross-sectional analysis within a prospective cohort study on 679 patients with hip fractures over 65. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and routine hip CT imaging were utilized to assess cognition function and muscle characteristics in older adults with hip fractures. The CT scans provided data on cross-sectional area and attenuation for the gluteus maximus (G.MaxM) and the combined gluteus medius and minimus (G.Med/MinM). Participants were categorized into CI and non-CI groups based on education levels and MMSE scores. Multivariate logistic regressions, propensity score (PS) methods, and subgroup analysis were employed to analyze associations and validate findings. This study included 123 participants (81.6 ± 6.8 years, 74% female) with CI and 556 participants (78.5 ± 7.7 years, 72% female) without. Compared to the non-CI group, muscle parameters, especially density, were significantly lower in the CI group. Specifically, G.Med/Min muscle density, but not size was robustly associated with CI (odds ratio (OR) = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.62–0.96, P = 0.02), independent of other medical situations. Sensitivity analysis corroborated that G.Med/Min muscle density was consistently lower in the CI group than the non-CI group, as evidenced in the PS matched (P = 0.024) and weighted cohort (P = 0.033). Enhanced muscle parameters, particularly muscle density in the G.Med/MinM muscle, correlate with a lower risk of CI. Muscle density demonstrates a stronger association with cognitive performance than muscle size, highlighting its potential as a key focus in future cognitive health research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBMR Plus
JBMR Plus Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
103
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
High-fiber diet reduces bone formation but does not affect bone microarchitecture in type 2 diabetes individuals. Longitudinal Course of Circulating miRNAs in a Patient with Hypophosphatasia and Asfotase alfa Treatment: a Case Report In Vivo Glycation – Interplay between Oxidant and Carbonyl Stress in Bone ENPP1 enzyme replacement therapy improves ectopic calcification but does not rescue skeletal phenotype in a mouse model for craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Girk3 deletion increases osteoblast maturation and bone mass accrual in adult male mice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1