并购中的隐性监管:中国自愿赚取收益的证据

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100355
Wen Zeng, Huifang Yin
{"title":"并购中的隐性监管:中国自愿赚取收益的证据","authors":"Wen Zeng,&nbsp;Huifang Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earnout provisions (“earnouts” hereafter) provide for contingent payments in M&amp;A agreements and play a role in reducing information asymmetry. However, in China, earnouts are not solely driven by negotiations between acquirers and targets but are also related to regulatory preference. The CSRC amended the M&amp;A regulation in 2014, deregulating mandatory earnouts while retaining the approval system. Leveraging on this context, we explore whether regulators implement implicit regulation by encouraging the usage of voluntary earnouts, and the economic consequences of such action. Our results show that earnouts are more likely to be included in an M&amp;A contract when the deal requires CSRC approval. M&amp;As that involve earnouts are also more likely to obtain regulatory approval and in a shorter time. These findings suggest that regulators may still prefer earnouts even after deregulation. In addition, we find that the association between voluntary earnouts and acquirers’ post-acquisition performance is negative when the M&amp;A deal requires regulatory approval, suggesting that voluntary earnouts influenced by regulatory preference can potentially have a negative impact. Further analyses indicate that this impact can be alleviated by comment letters and market monitoring. Our findings provide regulators with insights into the effects of the regulatory reform in the M&amp;A market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133/pdfft?md5=1bceb5ee3fd0d8ff1d2fda75d53d123c&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicit regulation in M&As: Evidence from voluntary earnouts in China\",\"authors\":\"Wen Zeng,&nbsp;Huifang Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earnout provisions (“earnouts” hereafter) provide for contingent payments in M&amp;A agreements and play a role in reducing information asymmetry. However, in China, earnouts are not solely driven by negotiations between acquirers and targets but are also related to regulatory preference. The CSRC amended the M&amp;A regulation in 2014, deregulating mandatory earnouts while retaining the approval system. Leveraging on this context, we explore whether regulators implement implicit regulation by encouraging the usage of voluntary earnouts, and the economic consequences of such action. Our results show that earnouts are more likely to be included in an M&amp;A contract when the deal requires CSRC approval. M&amp;As that involve earnouts are also more likely to obtain regulatory approval and in a shorter time. These findings suggest that regulators may still prefer earnouts even after deregulation. In addition, we find that the association between voluntary earnouts and acquirers’ post-acquisition performance is negative when the M&amp;A deal requires regulatory approval, suggesting that voluntary earnouts influenced by regulatory preference can potentially have a negative impact. Further analyses indicate that this impact can be alleviated by comment letters and market monitoring. Our findings provide regulators with insights into the effects of the regulatory reform in the M&amp;A market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133/pdfft?md5=1bceb5ee3fd0d8ff1d2fda75d53d123c&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000133-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

收益条款(以下简称 "收益条款")是并购协议中的或有支付条款,在减少信息不对称方面发挥着作用。然而,在中国,收益分配并非仅由收购方和目标公司之间的谈判驱动,还与监管偏好有关。中国证监会于 2014 年修订了《并购重组管理办法》,在保留审批制度的同时,放松了对强制收益分配的管制。在此背景下,我们探讨了监管机构是否通过鼓励使用自愿性收益补偿来实施隐性监管,以及这种行为的经济后果。我们的研究结果表明,当并购交易需要中国证监会审批时,收益分配更有可能被纳入并购合同。涉及收益补偿的并购也更有可能在更短时间内获得监管部门的批准。这些研究结果表明,即使在放松监管之后,监管机构可能仍然偏好收益分配。此外,我们还发现,当并购交易需要监管部门批准时,自愿收益补偿与并购方的并购后业绩之间的关系是负相关的,这表明受监管部门偏好影响的自愿收益补偿可能会产生负面影响。进一步的分析表明,这种影响可以通过意见函和市场监测得到缓解。我们的研究结果为监管机构提供了监管改革对并购市场影响的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implicit regulation in M&As: Evidence from voluntary earnouts in China

Earnout provisions (“earnouts” hereafter) provide for contingent payments in M&A agreements and play a role in reducing information asymmetry. However, in China, earnouts are not solely driven by negotiations between acquirers and targets but are also related to regulatory preference. The CSRC amended the M&A regulation in 2014, deregulating mandatory earnouts while retaining the approval system. Leveraging on this context, we explore whether regulators implement implicit regulation by encouraging the usage of voluntary earnouts, and the economic consequences of such action. Our results show that earnouts are more likely to be included in an M&A contract when the deal requires CSRC approval. M&As that involve earnouts are also more likely to obtain regulatory approval and in a shorter time. These findings suggest that regulators may still prefer earnouts even after deregulation. In addition, we find that the association between voluntary earnouts and acquirers’ post-acquisition performance is negative when the M&A deal requires regulatory approval, suggesting that voluntary earnouts influenced by regulatory preference can potentially have a negative impact. Further analyses indicate that this impact can be alleviated by comment letters and market monitoring. Our findings provide regulators with insights into the effects of the regulatory reform in the M&A market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Coping strategy of independent directors for job-fulfillment risk under different ownership types and enforced legal environments How does digital transformation affect corporate accounting employees? ESG performance and cost of debt Personal data security and stock crash risk: Evidence from China’s Cybersecurity Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1