{"title":"并购中的隐性监管:中国自愿赚取收益的证据","authors":"Wen Zeng, Huifang Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earnout provisions (“earnouts” hereafter) provide for contingent payments in M&A agreements and play a role in reducing information asymmetry. However, in China, earnouts are not solely driven by negotiations between acquirers and targets but are also related to regulatory preference. The CSRC amended the M&A regulation in 2014, deregulating mandatory earnouts while retaining the approval system. Leveraging on this context, we explore whether regulators implement implicit regulation by encouraging the usage of voluntary earnouts, and the economic consequences of such action. Our results show that earnouts are more likely to be included in an M&A contract when the deal requires CSRC approval. M&As that involve earnouts are also more likely to obtain regulatory approval and in a shorter time. These findings suggest that regulators may still prefer earnouts even after deregulation. In addition, we find that the association between voluntary earnouts and acquirers’ post-acquisition performance is negative when the M&A deal requires regulatory approval, suggesting that voluntary earnouts influenced by regulatory preference can potentially have a negative impact. Further analyses indicate that this impact can be alleviated by comment letters and market monitoring. Our findings provide regulators with insights into the effects of the regulatory reform in the M&A market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"17 2","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133/pdfft?md5=1bceb5ee3fd0d8ff1d2fda75d53d123c&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000133-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implicit regulation in M&As: Evidence from voluntary earnouts in China\",\"authors\":\"Wen Zeng, Huifang Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Earnout provisions (“earnouts” hereafter) provide for contingent payments in M&A agreements and play a role in reducing information asymmetry. However, in China, earnouts are not solely driven by negotiations between acquirers and targets but are also related to regulatory preference. The CSRC amended the M&A regulation in 2014, deregulating mandatory earnouts while retaining the approval system. Leveraging on this context, we explore whether regulators implement implicit regulation by encouraging the usage of voluntary earnouts, and the economic consequences of such action. Our results show that earnouts are more likely to be included in an M&A contract when the deal requires CSRC approval. M&As that involve earnouts are also more likely to obtain regulatory approval and in a shorter time. These findings suggest that regulators may still prefer earnouts even after deregulation. In addition, we find that the association between voluntary earnouts and acquirers’ post-acquisition performance is negative when the M&A deal requires regulatory approval, suggesting that voluntary earnouts influenced by regulatory preference can potentially have a negative impact. Further analyses indicate that this impact can be alleviated by comment letters and market monitoring. Our findings provide regulators with insights into the effects of the regulatory reform in the M&A market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133/pdfft?md5=1bceb5ee3fd0d8ff1d2fda75d53d123c&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000133-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Journal of Accounting Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implicit regulation in M&As: Evidence from voluntary earnouts in China
Earnout provisions (“earnouts” hereafter) provide for contingent payments in M&A agreements and play a role in reducing information asymmetry. However, in China, earnouts are not solely driven by negotiations between acquirers and targets but are also related to regulatory preference. The CSRC amended the M&A regulation in 2014, deregulating mandatory earnouts while retaining the approval system. Leveraging on this context, we explore whether regulators implement implicit regulation by encouraging the usage of voluntary earnouts, and the economic consequences of such action. Our results show that earnouts are more likely to be included in an M&A contract when the deal requires CSRC approval. M&As that involve earnouts are also more likely to obtain regulatory approval and in a shorter time. These findings suggest that regulators may still prefer earnouts even after deregulation. In addition, we find that the association between voluntary earnouts and acquirers’ post-acquisition performance is negative when the M&A deal requires regulatory approval, suggesting that voluntary earnouts influenced by regulatory preference can potentially have a negative impact. Further analyses indicate that this impact can be alleviated by comment letters and market monitoring. Our findings provide regulators with insights into the effects of the regulatory reform in the M&A market.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.