脊髓损伤患者神经康复最终结果评分的影响因素:纵向队列研究

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurorestoratology Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100117
Mir Saeed Yekaninejad , Nazi Derakhshanrad , Elahe Kazemi , Asal Derakhshanrad , Hooshang Saberi
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者神经康复最终结果评分的影响因素:纵向队列研究","authors":"Mir Saeed Yekaninejad ,&nbsp;Nazi Derakhshanrad ,&nbsp;Elahe Kazemi ,&nbsp;Asal Derakhshanrad ,&nbsp;Hooshang Saberi","doi":"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Longitudinal prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the coefficient of efficacy and the influence of various demographic and neurological factors on changes in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III) scores over time in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Patient recruitment and evaluations were conducted at the Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed over an 8-year period in our outpatient rehabilitation setting. Changes in SCIM-III scores were assessed in 559 TSCI patients (of 1460 enrolled patients) who fit the inclusion criteria. All included patients participated in our outpatient rehabilitation program, which consisted of a multidisciplinary education program combined with occupational therapy, physical therapy, and home nursing as a rehabilitation package for a 6-month period. Patients then received follow-up assessments every 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Predictors of the SCIM-III score as a rehabilitation outcome tool, and of its change over time, included age (younger patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.067), marital status (married patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.031), education level (patients with university education had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.003), occupation status (employed patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.009), and neurological level of injury (patients with injuries at lower levels had better outcomes, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). However, sex and injury severity as per the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) had no significant effects on functional outcomes (i.e., SCIM-III score changes over time).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Age, marital status, education level, employment, and neurological level all affected the final SCIM-III scores of SCI patients. By contrast, sex and AIS grade were not significant predictors of SCIM-III outcomes. Further studies that include additional factors may be useful for future SCIM-III models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44709,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","volume":"12 2","pages":"Article 100117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232424262400024X/pdfft?md5=1d1f9684350af91e0f66ff7b9ab4539c&pid=1-s2.0-S232424262400024X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influential factors for final neurorehabilitation outcome scores in patients with spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Mir Saeed Yekaninejad ,&nbsp;Nazi Derakhshanrad ,&nbsp;Elahe Kazemi ,&nbsp;Asal Derakhshanrad ,&nbsp;Hooshang Saberi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Longitudinal prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the coefficient of efficacy and the influence of various demographic and neurological factors on changes in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III) scores over time in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) patients.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Patient recruitment and evaluations were conducted at the Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was performed over an 8-year period in our outpatient rehabilitation setting. Changes in SCIM-III scores were assessed in 559 TSCI patients (of 1460 enrolled patients) who fit the inclusion criteria. All included patients participated in our outpatient rehabilitation program, which consisted of a multidisciplinary education program combined with occupational therapy, physical therapy, and home nursing as a rehabilitation package for a 6-month period. Patients then received follow-up assessments every 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Predictors of the SCIM-III score as a rehabilitation outcome tool, and of its change over time, included age (younger patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.067), marital status (married patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.031), education level (patients with university education had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.003), occupation status (employed patients had better outcomes, <em>p</em> = 0.009), and neurological level of injury (patients with injuries at lower levels had better outcomes, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). However, sex and injury severity as per the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) had no significant effects on functional outcomes (i.e., SCIM-III score changes over time).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Age, marital status, education level, employment, and neurological level all affected the final SCIM-III scores of SCI patients. By contrast, sex and AIS grade were not significant predictors of SCIM-III outcomes. Further studies that include additional factors may be useful for future SCIM-III models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurorestoratology\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232424262400024X/pdfft?md5=1d1f9684350af91e0f66ff7b9ab4539c&pid=1-s2.0-S232424262400024X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurorestoratology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232424262400024X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurorestoratology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S232424262400024X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计纵向前瞻性队列研究.目的评估创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)患者脊髓独立性测量 III(SCIM-III)评分随时间变化的疗效系数以及各种人口统计学和神经学因素的影响.地点伊朗德黑兰伊玛目霍梅尼综合医院脑与脊髓损伤研究中心进行了患者招募和评估.方法该研究在我们的门诊康复中心进行,为期 8 年。对符合纳入标准的 559 名 TSCI 患者(共 1460 人)的 SCIM-III 评分变化进行了评估。所有纳入的患者都参加了我们的门诊康复计划,该计划由多学科教育计划、职业疗法、物理疗法和家庭护理组成,是一个为期 6 个月的康复套餐。结果SCIM-III评分作为康复结果工具的预测因素及其随时间的变化包括年龄(年轻患者的结果更好,P = 0.067)、婚姻状况(已婚患者的结果更好,P = 0.031)、教育程度(受过大学教育的患者疗效较好,p = 0.003)、职业状况(有工作的患者疗效较好,p = 0.009)和神经损伤程度(损伤程度较轻的患者疗效较好,p <0.001)。结论 年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度、就业和神经水平都会影响 SCI 患者的 SCIM-III 最终得分。相比之下,性别和 AIS 等级对 SCIM-III 结果的预测意义不大。包含其他因素的进一步研究可能对未来的 SCIM-III 模型有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influential factors for final neurorehabilitation outcome scores in patients with spinal cord injury: A longitudinal cohort study

Study design

Longitudinal prospective cohort study.

Objectives

To assess the coefficient of efficacy and the influence of various demographic and neurological factors on changes in Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM-III) scores over time in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) patients.

Setting

Patient recruitment and evaluations were conducted at the Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran, Iran.

Methods

The study was performed over an 8-year period in our outpatient rehabilitation setting. Changes in SCIM-III scores were assessed in 559 TSCI patients (of 1460 enrolled patients) who fit the inclusion criteria. All included patients participated in our outpatient rehabilitation program, which consisted of a multidisciplinary education program combined with occupational therapy, physical therapy, and home nursing as a rehabilitation package for a 6-month period. Patients then received follow-up assessments every 6 months.

Results

Predictors of the SCIM-III score as a rehabilitation outcome tool, and of its change over time, included age (younger patients had better outcomes, p = 0.067), marital status (married patients had better outcomes, p = 0.031), education level (patients with university education had better outcomes, p = 0.003), occupation status (employed patients had better outcomes, p = 0.009), and neurological level of injury (patients with injuries at lower levels had better outcomes, p < 0.001). However, sex and injury severity as per the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) had no significant effects on functional outcomes (i.e., SCIM-III score changes over time).

Conclusion

Age, marital status, education level, employment, and neurological level all affected the final SCIM-III scores of SCI patients. By contrast, sex and AIS grade were not significant predictors of SCIM-III outcomes. Further studies that include additional factors may be useful for future SCIM-III models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurorestoratology
Journal of Neurorestoratology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
22
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Authors’ response to correspondence regarding “Application of deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke neurorestoration: A review” Response to the Letter from Dr. Li et al. for “Two Sides of One Coin: Neurorestoratology and Neurorehabilitation” Letter to Editor: Correspondence to "Two sides of one coin: Neurorestoratology and Neurorehabilitation" Corrigendum to “Comparison of chronic restraint stress-and lipopolysaccharide-induced mouse models of depression: Behavior, c-Fos expression, and microglial and astrocytic activation” [J Neurorestoratol 12 (2024) 100130] Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1