就人工智能在内窥镜检查中的应用现状、解决障碍以及推进人工智能在消化内科中的应用发表共识声明。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003
ASGE AI Task Force, Sravanthi Parasa MD , Tyler Berzin MD , Cadman Leggett MD , Seth Gross MD , Alessandro Repici MD , Omer F. Ahmad MD , Austin Chiang MD , Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu MD , Jonathan Cohen MD , Evelien Dekker MD , Rajesh N. Keswani MD , Charles E. Kahn MD , Cesare Hassan PhD , Nicholas Petrick PhD , Peter Mountney MBBS , Jonathan Ng PhD , Michael Riegler PhD , Yuichi Mori MD, PhD , Yutaka Saito MD , Prateek Sharma MD
{"title":"就人工智能在内窥镜检查中的应用现状、解决障碍以及推进人工智能在消化内科中的应用发表共识声明。","authors":"ASGE AI Task Force,&nbsp;Sravanthi Parasa MD ,&nbsp;Tyler Berzin MD ,&nbsp;Cadman Leggett MD ,&nbsp;Seth Gross MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Repici MD ,&nbsp;Omer F. Ahmad MD ,&nbsp;Austin Chiang MD ,&nbsp;Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Cohen MD ,&nbsp;Evelien Dekker MD ,&nbsp;Rajesh N. Keswani MD ,&nbsp;Charles E. Kahn MD ,&nbsp;Cesare Hassan PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Petrick PhD ,&nbsp;Peter Mountney MBBS ,&nbsp;Jonathan Ng PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Riegler PhD ,&nbsp;Yuichi Mori MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Saito MD ,&nbsp;Prateek Sharma MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>Statement 1</em>: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. <em>Statement 2:</em> Computer vision–based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing–based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. <em>Statement 3:</em> AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. <em>Statement 4:</em> Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. <em>Statement 5:</em> Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. <em>Statement 6:</em> Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. <em>Statement 7:</em> Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human–AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. <em>Statement 8:</em> For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. <em>Statement 9:</em> Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. <em>Statement 10:</em> A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 1","pages":"Pages 2-9.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology\",\"authors\":\"ASGE AI Task Force,&nbsp;Sravanthi Parasa MD ,&nbsp;Tyler Berzin MD ,&nbsp;Cadman Leggett MD ,&nbsp;Seth Gross MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Repici MD ,&nbsp;Omer F. Ahmad MD ,&nbsp;Austin Chiang MD ,&nbsp;Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu MD ,&nbsp;Jonathan Cohen MD ,&nbsp;Evelien Dekker MD ,&nbsp;Rajesh N. Keswani MD ,&nbsp;Charles E. Kahn MD ,&nbsp;Cesare Hassan PhD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Petrick PhD ,&nbsp;Peter Mountney MBBS ,&nbsp;Jonathan Ng PhD ,&nbsp;Michael Riegler PhD ,&nbsp;Yuichi Mori MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yutaka Saito MD ,&nbsp;Prateek Sharma MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><em>Statement 1</em>: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. <em>Statement 2:</em> Computer vision–based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing–based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. <em>Statement 3:</em> AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. <em>Statement 4:</em> Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. <em>Statement 5:</em> Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. <em>Statement 6:</em> Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. <em>Statement 7:</em> Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human–AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. <em>Statement 8:</em> For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. <em>Statement 9:</em> Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. <em>Statement 10:</em> A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2-9.e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510723031395\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510723031395","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的美国胃肠内窥镜学会(ASGE)人工智能工作组与内窥镜、技术空间、监管机构和其他医学亚专业的专家一起发起了一个共识过程,分析了当前的文献,突出了潜在的领域,并概述了人工智能(AI)的必要研究,以便更清楚地了解人工智能,因为它目前与内窥镜有关。方法采用改进的德尔菲法,得出结论。声明1:目前人工智能的进展允许基于人工智能的算法的发展,这些算法可以应用于内窥镜检查,以提高内窥镜医师在内窥镜病变检测和表征方面的表现。声明2:基于计算机视觉的算法为使用人工智能重新定义内窥镜检查的质量指标提供了机会,这可以标准化,并且可以减少报告质量指标的主观性。基于自然语言处理的算法可以帮助毫不费力地报告GI内窥镜检查中当前质量指标所需的数据抽象。陈述3:人工智能技术可以支持智能内窥镜套件,这可能有助于优化内窥镜套件的工作流程,包括自动化文档。陈述4:使用人工智能和机器学习有助于预测建模、诊断和预测。在使用机器学习方法时,需要具有多维度的高质量数据来进行风险预测、特定临床状况的预测及其结果。声明5:大数据和基于云的工具可以帮助推进胃肠病学的临床研究。多模式数据是了解疾病状态最大程度和解锁治疗方案的关键。声明6:了解如何在胃肠病学文献和临床试验中评估人工智能算法对胃肠病学家、学员和研究人员很重要,因此需要胃肠道学会的教育努力。声明7:将人工智能解决方案整合到内窥镜的临床实践中存在一些挑战,包括理解人类与人工智能交互的作用。人工智能算法的透明度、可解释性和可解释性在胃肠道内镜的临床应用中起着关键作用。开发适当的人工智能治理、数据采购和人工智能生命周期所需的工具对于成功地将人工智能应用于临床实践至关重要。声明8:对于内窥镜中的人工智能支付,对人工智能系统潜在价值主张的全面评估可能有助于指导内窥镜中的购买决策。需要可靠的成本效益研究来指导报销。声明9:人工智能在胃肠病学中的相关临床结果和性能指标目前还没有很好的定义。为了提高该领域研究的质量和可解释性,需要采取步骤来定义这些证据标准。声明10:对人工智能技术的平衡看法以及医疗技术行业、计算机科学家、胃肠病学家和研究人员之间的积极合作对于人工智能在胃肠病学领域的有意义的进步至关重要。由ASGE人工智能工作组和来自不同学科的专家领导的共识过程揭示了人工智能在内窥镜和胃肠病学中的潜力。基于人工智能的算法在提高内窥镜医师的表现、重新定义质量指标、优化工作流程以及帮助预测建模和诊断方面显示出了前景。然而,在评估人工智能算法、确保透明度和可解释性、解决治理和数据采购、确定支付模式、定义相关临床结果以及促进利益相关者之间的合作方面仍然存在挑战。应对这些挑战,同时保持平衡的观点对于人工智能在胃肠病学领域的有意义的进步至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology

Background and Aims

The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) AI Task Force along with experts in endoscopy, technology space, regulatory authorities, and other medical subspecialties initiated a consensus process that analyzed the current literature, highlighted potential areas, and outlined the necessary research in artificial intelligence (AI) to allow a clearer understanding of AI as it pertains to endoscopy currently.

Methods

A modified Delphi process was used to develop these consensus statements.

Results

Statement 1: Current advances in AI allow for the development of AI-based algorithms that can be applied to endoscopy to augment endoscopist performance in detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. Statement 2: Computer vision–based algorithms provide opportunities to redefine quality metrics in endoscopy using AI, which can be standardized and can reduce subjectivity in reporting quality metrics. Natural language processing–based algorithms can help with the data abstraction needed for reporting current quality metrics in GI endoscopy effortlessly. Statement 3: AI technologies can support smart endoscopy suites, which may help optimize workflows in the endoscopy suite, including automated documentation. Statement 4: Using AI and machine learning helps in predictive modeling, diagnosis, and prognostication. High-quality data with multidimensionality are needed for risk prediction, prognostication of specific clinical conditions, and their outcomes when using machine learning methods. Statement 5: Big data and cloud-based tools can help advance clinical research in gastroenterology. Multimodal data are key to understanding the maximal extent of the disease state and unlocking treatment options. Statement 6: Understanding how to evaluate AI algorithms in the gastroenterology literature and clinical trials is important for gastroenterologists, trainees, and researchers, and hence education efforts by GI societies are needed. Statement 7: Several challenges regarding integrating AI solutions into the clinical practice of endoscopy exist, including understanding the role of human–AI interaction. Transparency, interpretability, and explainability of AI algorithms play a key role in their clinical adoption in GI endoscopy. Developing appropriate AI governance, data procurement, and tools needed for the AI lifecycle are critical for the successful implementation of AI into clinical practice. Statement 8: For payment of AI in endoscopy, a thorough evaluation of the potential value proposition for AI systems may help guide purchasing decisions in endoscopy. Reliable cost-effectiveness studies to guide reimbursement are needed. Statement 9: Relevant clinical outcomes and performance metrics for AI in gastroenterology are currently not well defined. To improve the quality and interpretability of research in the field, steps need to be taken to define these evidence standards. Statement 10: A balanced view of AI technologies and active collaboration between the medical technology industry, computer scientists, gastroenterologists, and researchers are critical for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.

Conclusions

The consensus process led by the ASGE AI Task Force and experts from various disciplines has shed light on the potential of AI in endoscopy and gastroenterology. AI-based algorithms have shown promise in augmenting endoscopist performance, redefining quality metrics, optimizing workflows, and aiding in predictive modeling and diagnosis. However, challenges remain in evaluating AI algorithms, ensuring transparency and interpretability, addressing governance and data procurement, determining payment models, defining relevant clinical outcomes, and fostering collaboration between stakeholders. Addressing these challenges while maintaining a balanced perspective is crucial for the meaningful advancement of AI in gastroenterology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic submucosal dissection combined with endoscopic closure of gastrointestinal fistulas, including those refractory to previous treatment: results after descriptive series (with video) Economic impact and utilization trends of peroral endoscopic myotomy and endoscopic submucosal dissection Endoscopic versus surgical management of recurrent weight gain following sleeve gastrectomy Impact of a sustainability intervention on the carbon footprint and processing expenses of endoscopic waste Precipitation-based versus filtration-based liquid-based cytology in endoscopic ultrasound—guided fine-needle biopsy specimens of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial (with video)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1