急诊科就诊儿童的休克指数:全国代表性样本分析

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.022
{"title":"急诊科就诊儿童的休克指数:全国代表性样本分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Shock Index (SI) is emerging as a potentially useful measure among children with injury or suspected sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of the SI and evaluate its association with clinical outcomes among all children presenting to the emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A complex survey of nonfederal U.S. ED encounters from 2016 through 2021 was analyzed. Among children, the Pediatric Age-Adjusted Shock Index (SIPA), Pediatric Shock Index (PSI), and the Temperature- and Age-Adjusted Shock Index (TAMSI) were analyzed. The association of these criteria with disposition, acuity, medication administration, diagnoses and procedures was analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A survey-weighted 81.5 million ED visits were included for children aged 4–16 years and 117.2 million visits were included for children aged 1–12 years. SI could be calculated for 78.6% of patients aged 4–16 years and 57.9% of patients aged 1–12 years. An abnormal SI was present in 15.9%, 11.1%, and 31.7% when using the SIPA, PSI, and TAMSI, respectively. With all criteria, an elevated SI was associated with greater hospitalization. The SIPA and PSI were associated with triage acuity. All criteria were associated with medical interventions, including provision of IV fluids and acquisition of blood cultures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An elevated SI is indicative of greater resource utilization needs among children in the ED. When using any criteria, an elevated SI was associated with clinically important outcomes. Further research is required to evaluate the distribution of the SI in children and to investigate its potential role within existing triage algorithms for children in the ED.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shock Index among Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: Analysis of Nationally Representative Sample\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Shock Index (SI) is emerging as a potentially useful measure among children with injury or suspected sepsis.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of the SI and evaluate its association with clinical outcomes among all children presenting to the emergency department (ED).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A complex survey of nonfederal U.S. ED encounters from 2016 through 2021 was analyzed. Among children, the Pediatric Age-Adjusted Shock Index (SIPA), Pediatric Shock Index (PSI), and the Temperature- and Age-Adjusted Shock Index (TAMSI) were analyzed. The association of these criteria with disposition, acuity, medication administration, diagnoses and procedures was analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A survey-weighted 81.5 million ED visits were included for children aged 4–16 years and 117.2 million visits were included for children aged 1–12 years. SI could be calculated for 78.6% of patients aged 4–16 years and 57.9% of patients aged 1–12 years. An abnormal SI was present in 15.9%, 11.1%, and 31.7% when using the SIPA, PSI, and TAMSI, respectively. With all criteria, an elevated SI was associated with greater hospitalization. The SIPA and PSI were associated with triage acuity. All criteria were associated with medical interventions, including provision of IV fluids and acquisition of blood cultures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An elevated SI is indicative of greater resource utilization needs among children in the ED. When using any criteria, an elevated SI was associated with clinically important outcomes. Further research is required to evaluate the distribution of the SI in children and to investigate its potential role within existing triage algorithms for children in the ED.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924000854\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924000854","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景休克指数(SI)正在成为受伤或疑似败血症儿童的一种潜在有用的测量指标。本研究旨在评估所有急诊科(ED)就诊儿童的休克指数分布情况,并评估其与临床结果的关联。在儿童中,分析了儿科年龄调整休克指数 (SIPA)、儿科休克指数 (PSI) 以及温度和年龄调整休克指数 (TAMSI)。结果经调查加权后,4-16 岁儿童的急诊就诊人次为 8,150 万,1-12 岁儿童的急诊就诊人次为 1.172 亿。78.6%的 4-16 岁患者和 57.9% 的 1-12 岁患者可以计算出 SI。在使用 SIPA、PSI 和 TAMSI 时,分别有 15.9%、11.1% 和 31.7% 的患者出现 SI 异常。在所有标准中,SI 升高与住院率增加有关。SIPA 和 PSI 与分诊严重程度相关。所有标准都与医疗干预有关,包括提供静脉输液和采集血液培养。在使用任何标准时,SI 升高都与临床重要结果相关。需要进一步研究来评估 SI 在儿童中的分布情况,并调查其在急诊室儿童现有分诊算法中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Shock Index among Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: Analysis of Nationally Representative Sample

Background

The Shock Index (SI) is emerging as a potentially useful measure among children with injury or suspected sepsis.

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the distribution of the SI and evaluate its association with clinical outcomes among all children presenting to the emergency department (ED).

Methods

A complex survey of nonfederal U.S. ED encounters from 2016 through 2021 was analyzed. Among children, the Pediatric Age-Adjusted Shock Index (SIPA), Pediatric Shock Index (PSI), and the Temperature- and Age-Adjusted Shock Index (TAMSI) were analyzed. The association of these criteria with disposition, acuity, medication administration, diagnoses and procedures was analyzed.

Results

A survey-weighted 81.5 million ED visits were included for children aged 4–16 years and 117.2 million visits were included for children aged 1–12 years. SI could be calculated for 78.6% of patients aged 4–16 years and 57.9% of patients aged 1–12 years. An abnormal SI was present in 15.9%, 11.1%, and 31.7% when using the SIPA, PSI, and TAMSI, respectively. With all criteria, an elevated SI was associated with greater hospitalization. The SIPA and PSI were associated with triage acuity. All criteria were associated with medical interventions, including provision of IV fluids and acquisition of blood cultures.

Conclusions

An elevated SI is indicative of greater resource utilization needs among children in the ED. When using any criteria, an elevated SI was associated with clinically important outcomes. Further research is required to evaluate the distribution of the SI in children and to investigate its potential role within existing triage algorithms for children in the ED.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
期刊最新文献
American Academy of Emergency Medicine Comments on “Opioid Prescribing by Emergency Physicians: Trends Study of Medicare Part D Prescriber Data 2013–2019" Reply to “Multilocular DWI-Hyperintense Cerebral Lesions in a Child with Mild Head Trauma Suggest Embolism Rather Than Thrombosis” Reply to “Simultaneous Juvenile Stroke and Myocardial Infarction Require Clarification of the Underlying Etiology and Adequate Treatment” Simultaneous Juvenile Stroke and Myocardial Infarction Require Clarification of the Underlying Etiology and Adequate Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1